Literature DB >> 25826444

Direct measurements show decreasing methane emissions from natural gas local distribution systems in the United States.

Brian K Lamb, Steven L Edburg, Thomas W Ferrara, Touché Howard, Matthew R Harrison1, Charles E Kolb2, Amy Townsend-Small3, Wesley Dyck, Antonio Possolo4, James R Whetstone4.   

Abstract

Fugitive losses from natural gas distribution systems are a significant source of anthropogenic methane. Here, we report on a national sampling program to measure methane emissions from 13 urban distribution systems across the U.S. Emission factors were derived from direct measurements at 230 underground pipeline leaks and 229 metering and regulating facilities using stratified random sampling. When these new emission factors are combined with estimates for customer meters, maintenance, and upsets, and current pipeline miles and numbers of facilities, the total estimate is 393 Gg/yr with a 95% upper confidence limit of 854 Gg/yr (0.10% to 0.22% of the methane delivered nationwide). This fraction includes emissions from city gates to the customer meter, but does not include other urban sources or those downstream of customer meters. The upper confidence limit accounts for the skewed distribution of measurements, where a few large emitters accounted for most of the emissions. This emission estimate is 36% to 70% less than the 2011 EPA inventory, (based largely on 1990s emission data), and reflects significant upgrades at metering and regulating stations, improvements in leak detection and maintenance activities, as well as potential effects from differences in methodologies between the two studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25826444     DOI: 10.1021/es505116p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions.

Authors:  Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Ramón A Alvarez; Kenneth J Davis; Robert Harriss; Scott C Herndon; Anna Karion; Eric Adam Kort; Brian K Lamb; Xin Lan; Anthony J Marchese; Stephen W Pacala; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Robert Talbot; Amy Townsend-Small; Tara I Yacovitch; Daniel J Zimmerle; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Detection Limits of Optical Gas Imaging for Natural Gas Leak Detection in Realistic Controlled Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Zimmerle; Timothy Vaughn; Clay Bell; Kristine Bennett; Parik Deshmukh; Eben Thoma
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Super-emitters in natural gas infrastructure are caused by abnormal process conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Zavala-Araiza; Ramón A Alvarez; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Anthony J Marchese; Daniel J Zimmerle; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Methane emissions from the Marcellus Shale in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia based on airborne measurements.

Authors:  Xinrong Ren; Dolly L Hall; Timothy Vinciguerra; Sarah E Benish; Phillip R Stratton; Doyeon Ahn; Jonathan R Hansford; Mark D Cohen; Sayantan Sahu; Hao He; Courtney Grimes; Ross J Salawitch; Sheryl H Ehrman; Russell R Dickerson
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.261

6.  Large Fugitive Methane Emissions From Urban Centers Along the U.S. East Coast.

Authors:  Genevieve Plant; Eric A Kort; Cody Floerchinger; Alexander Gvakharia; Isaac Vimont; Colm Sweeney
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.720

7.  Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom.

Authors:  Erin N Mayfield; Jared L Cohon; Nicholas Z Muller; Inês M L Azevedo; Allen L Robinson
Journal:  Nat Sustain       Date:  2019

8.  Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change.

Authors:  Joshua L Laughner; Jessica L Neu; David Schimel; Paul O Wennberg; Kelley Barsanti; Kevin W Bowman; Abhishek Chatterjee; Bart E Croes; Helen L Fitzmaurice; Daven K Henze; Jinsol Kim; Eric A Kort; Zhu Liu; Kazuyuki Miyazaki; Alexander J Turner; Susan Anenberg; Jeremy Avise; Hansen Cao; David Crisp; Joost de Gouw; Annmarie Eldering; John C Fyfe; Daniel L Goldberg; Kevin R Gurney; Sina Hasheminassab; Francesca Hopkins; Cesunica E Ivey; Dylan B A Jones; Junjie Liu; Nicole S Lovenduski; Randall V Martin; Galen A McKinley; Lesley Ott; Benjamin Poulter; Muye Ru; Stanley P Sander; Neil Swart; Yuk L Yung; Zhao-Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Assessing Connectivity Between an Overlying Aquifer and a Coal Seam Gas Resource Using Methane Isotopes, Dissolved Organic Carbon and Tritium.

Authors:  Charlotte P Iverach; Dioni I Cendón; Stuart I Hankin; David Lowry; Rebecca E Fisher; James L France; Euan G Nisbet; Andy Baker; Bryce F J Kelly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.