BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by a mixture of emphysema and airway disease. The forced oscillation technique (FOT) has been applied to COPD patients to clarify changes in respiratory mechanics; dynamic changes in respiratory resistance (Rrs) during breathing (within-breath changes in Rrs, ΔRrs) are characteristic of COPD. However, the pathophysiological significance of these changes is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess how emphysema and airway disease influence ΔRrs in COPD patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, stable COPD patients were recruited and underwent respiratory impedance measurements with a commercially available FOT device. Rrs was recorded during tidal breathing and then analyzed as whole-breath Rrs (Rrs at 5 Hz, R5; Rrs at 20 Hz, R20; and their difference, R5-R20) or as ΔRrs, the difference between the expiratory and inspiratory Rrs (ΔR5, ΔR20 and ΔR5-R20). The percentage of the low attenuation area (LAA%) and airway wall area (WA%) was quantified by computed tomography analysis, and their contributions to ΔRrs were examined. RESULTS: Seventy-five COPD patients were recruited. LAA% was negatively correlated with ΔR5 and ΔR5-R20 (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0033, respectively); meanwhile, WA% in B(10) was positively correlated with ΔR5 and ΔR5-R20 (P = 0.0057 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the contribution of both LAA% and WA% in B(10) to ΔRrs was independent of the severity of airflow limitations. CONCLUSION: This study shows that emphysema suppresses ΔRrs in COPD patients, while airway disease increases ΔRrs in these patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by a mixture of emphysema and airway disease. The forced oscillation technique (FOT) has been applied to COPDpatients to clarify changes in respiratory mechanics; dynamic changes in respiratory resistance (Rrs) during breathing (within-breath changes in Rrs, ΔRrs) are characteristic of COPD. However, the pathophysiological significance of these changes is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess how emphysema and airway disease influence ΔRrs in COPDpatients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, stable COPDpatients were recruited and underwent respiratory impedance measurements with a commercially available FOT device. Rrs was recorded during tidal breathing and then analyzed as whole-breath Rrs (Rrs at 5 Hz, R5; Rrs at 20 Hz, R20; and their difference, R5-R20) or as ΔRrs, the difference between the expiratory and inspiratory Rrs (ΔR5, ΔR20 and ΔR5-R20). The percentage of the low attenuation area (LAA%) and airway wall area (WA%) was quantified by computed tomography analysis, and their contributions to ΔRrs were examined. RESULTS: Seventy-five COPDpatients were recruited. LAA% was negatively correlated with ΔR5 and ΔR5-R20 (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0033, respectively); meanwhile, WA% in B(10) was positively correlated with ΔR5 and ΔR5-R20 (P = 0.0057 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the contribution of both LAA% and WA% in B(10) to ΔRrs was independent of the severity of airflow limitations. CONCLUSION: This study shows that emphysema suppresses ΔRrs in COPDpatients, while airway disease increases ΔRrs in these patients.