Prediction of hard meningiomas: quantitative evaluation based on the magnetic resonance signal intensity.

BACKGROUND: From a surgical perspective, presurgical prediction of meningioma consistency is beneficial.
PURPOSE: To quantitatively analyze the correlation between the magnetic resonance (MR) signal intensity (SI) or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and meningioma consistency and to determine which MR sequence could help predicting hard meningiomas.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 43 patients with meningiomas who underwent preoperative MR imaging (MRI), including T1-weighted (T1W) imaging, T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), contrast-enhanced (CE)-T1W imaging, and CE-fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA). A neurosurgeon evaluated the tumor consistency using a visual analog scale (VAS) with the anchors "soft" (score = 0) and "hard" (score = 10). The SI ratio (tumor to cerebral cortex SI) and ADC value were compared with the tumor consistency. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting hard meningiomas (VAS score ≥8; 9 of 43 patients) were calculated using cutoff values for the SI ratio that were obtained in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: A significant negative correlation was observed between the tumor consistency and the SI ratio on T2W imaging, FLAIR, and CE-FIESTA (P < 0.05) but not on T1W imaging, CE-T1W imaging, and the ADC value. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting hard meningiomas were 89%, 79%, and 81% with T2W imaging; 89%, 76%, and 79% with FLAIR; and 100%, 74%, and 79% with CE-FIESTA, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a quantitative assessment using conventional T2W imaging or FLAIR may be a simple and useful method for predicting hard meningiomas. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2015.