Literature DB >> 25824196

Reconstructive outcomes of Mohs surgery compared with conventional excision: A 13-month prospective study.

R A J Wain1, H Tehrani2.   

Abstract

Established in 2012, the Mersey Regional Centre for Mohs Surgery is the first UK Mohs service to be led by a Mohs trained Plastic & Reconstructive surgeon. We evaluate the resection requirements and reconstructive techniques of our patient group and compare their surgical outcome to that which would have been gained with conventional excision (CE) and reconstruction for the same lesions. 157 patients were analysed over 13 months. Had CE and reconstruction been used, 56% of patients would have received a more invasive or cosmetically less desirable reconstruction, and 24% of margins would remain incomplete. The outcome was unchanged in 20% of patients. A small but significant subgroup (9%) of patients would have lost fundamental structures e.g. orbital exenteration, or undergone reconstructions unnecessarily crossing aesthetic subunits. Whilst in its infancy, the Plastic & Reconstructive Mohs surgery service has provided a valuable contribution to the care given to patients in the Mersey and Cheshire Skin Cancer Network. Detailed referral criteria, thorough preoperative patient evaluation, and appreciation of the abilities and limits of CE have enabled the service to produce a demonstrable reconstructive benefit in 80% of patients when compared to non-Mohs resection and reconstruction.
Copyright © 2015 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional excision; MMS; Mohs; Mohs micrographic surgery; Plastic surgery; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25824196     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Correlation Between Demographic and Tumor Characteristics in Non-melanoma Skin Cancers Submitted to Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

Authors:  Ellem T S Weimann; Caroline M BrandÃo; Luiz R Terzian; Francisco M Paschoal; Carlos D S Machado Filho; Paulo R Criado
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Operative management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the breast.

Authors:  Frank Saporito; Petros Charalampoudis; Melissa Kinney; Sally Knox
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-01

Review 3.  Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Development, Technique, and Applications in Cutaneous Malignancies.

Authors:  Eillen Luisa A Chen; Divya Srivastava; Rajiv I Nijhawan
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans.

Authors:  Alvaro E Acosta; Catalina Santa Vélez
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-08-10

5.  Head and Neck Porocarcinoma: SEER Analysis of Epidemiology and Survival.

Authors:  Matteo Scampa; Rastine Merat; Daniel F Kalbermatten; Carlo M Oranges
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.