Literature DB >> 25824193

Preoperative CT angiography versus Doppler ultrasound mapping of abdominal perforator in DIEP breast reconstructions: A randomized prospective study.

S Klasson1, H Svensson2, K Malm2, J Wassélius3, P Velander2.   

Abstract

Is there a difference in surgery time and complication rate when Doppler ultrasound (US) is used for the preoperative mapping of perforators in comparison with computer tomography angiography (CTA)? Women who were candidates for breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. The operating time was 249 ± 62 min (mean ± SD) in the CTA group (n = 32) and 255 min ± 75 in the US group (n = 31)--hence a difference of 6 min on average. No flaps were lost. Sixteen complications occurred in 15 patients: seven in the CTA group and nine in the US group. Complications were remedied without delay and all patients came through with a favorable reconstruction. Preoperative mapping of perforators with US is satisfactory enough provided the microsurgery team has proper experience in breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap.
Copyright © 2015 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; CT angiography; DIEP flap; Doppler ultrasound; Surgery time

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25824193     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of visualized preoperative imaging with a focus on surgical procedures of the breast.

Authors:  Bridget Rodkin; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

2.  Through the HoloLens™ looking glass: augmented reality for extremity reconstruction surgery using 3D vascular models with perforating vessels.

Authors:  Philip Pratt; Matthew Ives; Graham Lawton; Jonathan Simmons; Nasko Radev; Liana Spyropoulou; Dimitri Amiras
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-01-31

3.  Viability of five different pre- and intraoperative imaging methods for autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  K F Schrögendorfer; S Nickl; M Keck; D B Lumenta; C Loewe; M Gschwandtner; W Haslik; J Nedomansky
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 0.953

4.  The Expanding Role of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-09-05

5.  Automatic detection of perforators for microsurgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Carlos Mavioso; Ricardo J Araújo; Hélder P Oliveira; João C Anacleto; Maria Antónia Vasconcelos; David Pinto; Pedro F Gouveia; Celeste Alves; Fátima Cardoso; Jaime S Cardoso; Maria João Cardoso
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 4.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.