Susanne Vogel1, Floris Klumpers2, Marijn C W Kroes3, Krista T Oplaat3, Harm J Krugers4, Melly S Oitzl4, Marian Joëls5, Guillén Fernández2. 1. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen. Electronic address: s.vogel@donders.ru.nl. 2. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen. 3. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour. 4. Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. 5. Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fear learning in stressful situations is highly adaptive for survival by steering behavior in subsequent situations, but fear learning can become disproportionate in vulnerable individuals. Despite the potential clinical significance, the mechanism by which stress modulates fear learning is poorly understood. Memory theories state that stress can cause a shift away from more controlled processing depending on the hippocampus toward more reflexive processing supported by the amygdala and striatum. This shift may be mediated by activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) for cortisol. We investigated how stress shifts processes underlying cognitively demanding learning versus less demanding fear learning using a combined trace and delay fear conditioning paradigm. METHODS: In a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we tested 101 healthy men probing the effects of stress (socially evaluatedcold pressor vs. control procedure) and MR-availability (400 mg spironolactone vs. placebo) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, full-factorial, between-subjects design. RESULTS: Effective stress induction and successful conditioning were confirmed by subjective, physiologic, and somatic data. In line with a stress-induced shift, stress enhanced later recall of delay compared with trace conditioning in the MR-available groups as indexed by skin conductance responses. During learning, this was accompanied by a stress-induced reduction of learning-related hippocampal activity for trace conditioning. The stress-induced shift in fear and neural processing was absent in the MR-blocked groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in line with a stress-induced shift in fear learning, mediated by the MR, resulting in a dominance of cognitively less demanding amygdala-based learning, which might be particularly prominent in individuals with high MR sensitivity.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Fear learning in stressful situations is highly adaptive for survival by steering behavior in subsequent situations, but fear learning can become disproportionate in vulnerable individuals. Despite the potential clinical significance, the mechanism by which stress modulates fear learning is poorly understood. Memory theories state that stress can cause a shift away from more controlled processing depending on the hippocampus toward more reflexive processing supported by the amygdala and striatum. This shift may be mediated by activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) for cortisol. We investigated how stress shifts processes underlying cognitively demanding learning versus less demanding fear learning using a combined trace and delay fear conditioning paradigm. METHODS: In a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we tested 101 healthy men probing the effects of stress (socially evaluated cold pressor vs. control procedure) and MR-availability (400 mg spironolactone vs. placebo) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, full-factorial, between-subjects design. RESULTS: Effective stress induction and successful conditioning were confirmed by subjective, physiologic, and somatic data. In line with a stress-induced shift, stress enhanced later recall of delay compared with trace conditioning in the MR-available groups as indexed by skin conductance responses. During learning, this was accompanied by a stress-induced reduction of learning-related hippocampal activity for trace conditioning. The stress-induced shift in fear and neural processing was absent in the MR-blocked groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in line with a stress-induced shift in fear learning, mediated by the MR, resulting in a dominance of cognitively less demanding amygdala-based learning, which might be particularly prominent in individuals with high MR sensitivity.
Authors: Katja Wingenfeld; Linn K Kuehl; Isabel Dziobek; Stefan Roepke; Christian Otte; Kim Hinkelmann Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Saskia B J Koch; Floris Klumpers; Wei Zhang; Mahur M Hashemi; Reinoud Kaldewaij; Vanessa A van Ast; Annika S Smit; Karin Roelofs Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol Date: 2017-12-20
Authors: Thomas Maran; Pierre Sachse; Markus Martini; Barbara Weber; Jakob Pinggera; Stefan Zuggal; Marco Furtner Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Sofia Kanatsou; Henk Karst; Despoina Kortesidou; Rachelle A van den Akker; Jan den Blaauwen; Anjanette P Harris; Jonathan R Seckl; Harm J Krugers; Marian Joels Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 5.505
Authors: K Kalafatakis; G M Russell; C J Harmer; M R Munafo; N Marchant; A Wilson; J C Brooks; C Durant; J Thakrar; P Murphy; N J Thai; S L Lightman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sofia Kanatsou; Brenna C Fearey; Laura E Kuil; Paul J Lucassen; Anjanette P Harris; Jonathan R Seckl; Harm Krugers; Marian Joels Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240