Literature DB >> 25823594

Pain in cochlear implant recipients: an uncommon, yet serious, consequence of cochlear implantation.

Yisgav Shapira1,2, Yifat Yaar-Soffer3,4, Minka Hildesheimer3,4, Lela Migirov1,2, Yael Henkin3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We describe pain around the receiver/stimulator [RS] presenting months to years after implantation. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all cochlear implant recipients complaining of pain around their RS through the years 2009 through 2013, with a follow-up of at least 6 months. Excluded from the study were patients with an identifiable cause for their pain such as trauma, local infection, or skin breakdown. The therapy regimen and outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: Thirty patients complained of delayed pain over their RS, representing 2.8% of 1,044 implantations performed at the Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, as of 2013. The time from implantation to the presentation of pain ranged from 3 months to 12 years. The pain was perceptible even when the external magnet and processor were not used, and was usually most obvious in specific points around the RS. Seventy-seven percent of our patients responded well to conservative therapy. Fifteen (50%) responded to prolonged antibiotic treatment. Five patients (17%) responded to antiinflammatories alone. One patient (3%) responded to deactivation of two electrodes. Six patients (20%) required reimplantation, after which the pain resolved in all. At explantation, no signs of infection, foreign body reaction, or obvious device damage were found.
CONCLUSION: Delayed pain around the RS that is unrelated to use is a serious consequence of cochlear implantation, and in some cases, those necessitating reimplantation, should be considered a major complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; complications; pain

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25823594     DOI: 10.1002/lary.25272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative pain in patients undergoing a transcutaneous active bone conduction implant (Bonebridge).

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Miryam Calvino; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Clinical profile and management of revision cochlear implant surgeries.

Authors:  Ahmad M Aldhafeeri; Farid Alzhrani; Suliman Alajlan; Abdulrahman AlSanosi; Abdulrahman Hager
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.484

3.  Multimodal Analysis of the Tissue Response to a Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Presentation of a Two-Year Case Report of a Patient With Recurrent Pain, Inflammation, and Infection, Including a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Martin L Johansson; Tim G A Calon; Omar Omar; Furqan A Shah; Margarita Trobos; Peter Thomsen; Robert J Stokroos; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  Hearing Improvement After Pain Related to Cochlear Implant Explantation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Isra Aljazeeri; Maha Alrajhi; Abdulrahman Hagr
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Diagnosing complications following cochlear implantation using transcutaneous ultrasound.

Authors:  Robin Rupp; Vivian Thimsen; Matthias Balk; Sarina K Mueller; Matti Sievert; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Ulrich Hoppe; Joachim Hornung; Heinrich Iro; Antoniu-Oreste Gostian
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.