| Literature DB >> 25823539 |
Safal Khanal1, Amrit Pokharel2, Himal Kandel3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Albinism poses a significant threat to visual functions and causes remarkable ocular morbidity often resulting in visual disabilities. The study aimed at describing the visual status in patients with diagnosed cases of complete oculocutaneous albinism (OCA) attending to a tertiary eye hospital in Nepal.Entities:
Keywords: Albinism; Albinismo; Error refractivo; Esotropia; Esotropía; Nepal; Nistagmo; Nystagmus; Refractive error
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25823539 PMCID: PMC4812000 DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2015.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Optom ISSN: 1989-1342
Distribution of participants by age.
| Age (years) | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| 5–14 | 11 | 44 |
| 14–23 | 11 | 44 |
| 23–32 | 1 | 4 |
| 32–41 | 2 | 8 |
| Total | 25 | 100 |
| Mean 16 ± 8.40 years, 95% CI: 12.53–19.47, range: 5–37 | ||
Abbreviations: N, number; CI, confidence interval.
Distance visual acuity analysis.
| Distance VA in logMAR | Presenting visual acuity, | Corrected visual acuity, | Classification of VI |
|---|---|---|---|
| VA ≤ 0.48 | 1 (2) | 6 (12) | No or mild visual impairment |
| 0.48 < VA ≤ 1.00 | 19 (38) | 28 (56) | Moderate visual impairment |
| 1.00 < VA ≤ 1.30 | 16 (32) | 12 (24) | Severe visual impairment |
| VA > 1.30 | 14 (28) | 4 (8) | Blindness |
| Mean distance VA | 1.24 ± 0.50 | 1.025 ± 0.48 | Severe visual impairment |
Abbreviations: VA, visual acuity; n, number.
Comparison between uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (in logMAR; paired samples t-test, all eyes included, n = 50).
| Minimum | Maximum | Median | Mean ± SD | 95% CI for mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCDVA | 3.00 | 0.48 | 1.13 | 1.24 ± 0.50 | 1.10–1.38 | 0.000 |
| BCDVA | 3.00 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 1.0252 ± 0.48 | 0.89–1.16 |
Refractive error analysis.
| Refractive error | % | Mean | Std. deviation | 95% CI | Min | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myopia | 8 | 16 | 6.56 | 4.52 | 2.79–10.33 | 2.00 | 15.00 |
| Hypermetropia | 8 | 16 | 1.53 | 1.26 | 0.48–2.58 | 0.50 | 4.00 |
| Myopic astigmatism | 17 | 34 | 4.65 | 4.69 | 2.24–7.06 | 0.25 | 20.00 |
| Hyperopic astigmatism | 8 | 16 | 5.16 | 3.71 | 2.06–8.26 | 0.25 | 9.00 |
| Mixed astigmatism | 9 | 18 | −0.19 | 0.81 | −0.80–0.44 | 0.75 | −2.00 |
Comparison between the two groups (independent sample t-test).
| Groups | Mean CVDA (logMAR) | Mean age (years) | 95% CI for the mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 27 (54) | 16.52 ± 7.54 | 13.54–19.50 | 0.07 |
| G2 | 1.19 ± 0.64 | 23 (46) | 14.78 ± 9.29 | 10.77–18.80 | |
| Total | 1.03 ± 0.48 | 50 | 16 ± 8.40 | 12.53–19.50 |
Figure 1Analysis of nystagmus: horizontal pendular nystagmus was the most common type.
Figure 2Gazes of null zone in eyes with nystagmus: primary position was the most common null point.
Figure 3Types of strabismus: alternating type of strabismus was the most common.
Figure 4Grading of stereopsis: most of the patients had no detectable stereopsis.
Analysis of groups based on stereopsis.
| NDS group | CS group | FS group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 8 | 4 | |
| Male:female ratio | 11:2 | 3:5 | 2:2 |
| Mean binocular BCDVA | 1.10 ± 0.63 | 0.86 ± 0.20 | 0.76 ± 0.35 |
| Mean macular transparency grade | 3.15 ± 0.38 | 3.38 ± 0.52 | 3.50 ± 1.00 |
| Mean iris transillumination grade | 3.50 ± 0.63 | 3.25 ± 0.46 | 2.00 |
| Nystagmus type, | HP, 9 | HP, 8 | HP, 0 |
Abbreviations: NDS, no detectable stereopsis; CS, coarse stereopsis; FS, fine stereopsis; HP, horizontal pendular; HRJ, horizontal right jerk; HLJ, horizontal left jerk.