Literature DB >> 25822924

A comparative evaluation of nebulized dexmedetomidine, nebulized ketamine, and their combination as premedication for outpatient pediatric dental surgery.

Ola M Zanaty1, Shahira Ahmed El Metainy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized dexmedetomidine, nebulized ketamine, and the combination of these drugs for premedication in pediatric outpatient dental surgeries.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was conducted in the Alexandria Main University Hospital after approval of the Medical Ethics Committee. Informed written consent was obtained from the patient's parents. Sixty children classified as ASA physical status I and II and aged 3 to 6 years were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly categorized into 3 equal groups. Group K was premedicated with nebulized ketamine (2 mg/kg), group D was premedicated with nebulized dexmedetomidine (2 μg/kg), and group DK was premedicated with combined nebulized dexmedetomidine and ketamine (1 μg/kg + 1 mg/kg). The primary end point was the level of sedation when the child was first seen in the operating room 30 minutes after sedation. The secondary end points were tolerance of mask induction, hemodynamic changes, analgesia, sedation at emergence, and wake-up behavior.
RESULTS: Studied groups were comparable as regards demographic data (age, weight, sex, and ASA physical status, all P > 0.226) and patients' acceptance of drugs (P = 0.968). Level of sedation at 30 minutes was significantly greater in group DK than in either group K (P = 0.003) or group D (P = 0.009). Group DK had the briefest recovery times, followed in order by group K and group D with progressively longer recovery times. Recovery times were significantly briefer in group DK than in either group K (P = 0.039) or group D (P < 0.001). Group DK had significantly briefer discharge times than group D (P < 0.001). Postoperative analgesia was significantly better in group DK compared with group K (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: A nebulized combination of low-dose ketamine and dexmedetomidine produced more satisfactory sedation and provided a smoother induction of general anesthesia than nebulized ketamine or dexmedetomidine alone, with more rapid recovery and no significant side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25822924     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  23 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of intranasal ketamine compared with intranasal dexmedetomidine as a premedication before general anesthesia in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Priyanka Dwivedi; Tejas K Patel; Vijeta Bajpai; Yashpal Singh; Alka Tripathi; Suerkha Kishore
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.713

2.  Comparative evaluation of nebulized ketamine and its combination with dexmedetomidine as premedication for paediatric patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Shital A Dharamkhele; Shalendra Singh; M S Honwad; Venkata Krishna Gollapalli; Nipun Gupta
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-02-23

3.  Search for the ideal route of premedication in children.. far from over?

Authors:  Saikat Sengupta; Prithwis Bhattacharya; Deb S Nag; Nishant Sahay
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-06-06

4.  Role of nebulised dexmedetomidine, midazolam or ketamine as premedication in preschool children undergoing general anaesthesia-A prospective, double-blind, randomised study.

Authors:  K Muhammed Shereef; Biswas Chaitali; Sengupta Swapnadeep; Mukherjee Gauri
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  Evaluation of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine Given Pre-operatively to Attenuate Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomised Control Trial.

Authors:  Priyanka Shrivastava; Mukesh Kumar; Saket Verma; Ridhima Sharma; Raman Kumar; Ravi Ranjan; Jay Prakash
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-22

6.  Pediatric premedication: a double-blind randomized trial of dexmedetomidine or ketamine alone versus a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine.

Authors:  Hui Qiao; Zhi Xie; Jie Jia
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Nebulized dexmedetomidine-lidocaine inhalation as a premedication for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Wei Gu; Meiying Xu; Huijie Lu; Qi Huang; Jingxiang Wu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Joji Sado-Filho; Patrícia Corrêa-Faria; Karolline A Viana; Fausto M Mendes; Keira P Mason; Luciane R Costa; Paulo S Costa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine-ketamine for premedication in pediatrics patients: A randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Ravi Bhat; M C B Santhosh; Venkatesh M Annigeri; Raghavendra P Rao
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2016 May-Aug

10.  Ketamine Enhances Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-Induced Sedation in Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Bin Qian; Wenting Zheng; Jiawei Shi; Zihan Chen; Yanhua Guo; Yusheng Yao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.