OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the usefulness of physical examination, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell (WBC) count, and absolute neutrophils counts (ANCs) for the diagnosis of invasive bacterial infections (IBIs) and potentially serious bacterial infections in infants younger than the age of 3 months presenting with fever without source (FWS) to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A descriptive retrospective study that includes all infants aged younger than 3 months who presented with FWS to the ED between July 2008 and January 2012. We evaluated diagnostic performance for each test by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were also calculated. RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Eleven bacteremia (3.5%) and 76 urinary tract infections (23.9%) were diagnosed. To detect IBI, the areas under the curve for the different tests were as follows: PCT, 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.96); CRP, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.36-0.73); ANC, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.34-0.71); and WBC, 0.42 (0.24-0.61). To detect potentially serious bacterial infections, the areas under the curve were as follows: PCT, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.59-0.74); CRP, 0.68 (0.60-0.76); ANC, 0.64 (0.56-0.71); and WBC, 0.66 (0.58-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin is better than CRP, WBC, and ANC to confirm or dismiss the presence of an IBI in infants aged younger than 3 months presenting with FWS to the ED. However, it could not identify almost 30% of infants with IBI. Most patients diagnosed with IBI (10 of 11) presented abnormal values in at least one of the analytical parameters and/or physical appearance. Four of 5 patients with IBI and well appearing presented abnormal results in at least one of the analytical parameters. Therefore, the development of tools combining different tests including the new biomarkers could increase the reliability of the tests for the diagnosis of IBI in these patients.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the usefulness of physical examination, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell (WBC) count, and absolute neutrophils counts (ANCs) for the diagnosis of invasive bacterial infections (IBIs) and potentially serious bacterial infections in infants younger than the age of 3 months presenting with fever without source (FWS) to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A descriptive retrospective study that includes all infants aged younger than 3 months who presented with FWS to the ED between July 2008 and January 2012. We evaluated diagnostic performance for each test by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were also calculated. RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Eleven bacteremia (3.5%) and 76 urinary tract infections (23.9%) were diagnosed. To detect IBI, the areas under the curve for the different tests were as follows: PCT, 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.96); CRP, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.36-0.73); ANC, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.34-0.71); and WBC, 0.42 (0.24-0.61). To detect potentially serious bacterial infections, the areas under the curve were as follows: PCT, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.59-0.74); CRP, 0.68 (0.60-0.76); ANC, 0.64 (0.56-0.71); and WBC, 0.66 (0.58-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin is better than CRP, WBC, and ANC to confirm or dismiss the presence of an IBI in infants aged younger than 3 months presenting with FWS to the ED. However, it could not identify almost 30% of infants with IBI. Most patients diagnosed with IBI (10 of 11) presented abnormal values in at least one of the analytical parameters and/or physical appearance. Four of 5 patients with IBI and well appearing presented abnormal results in at least one of the analytical parameters. Therefore, the development of tools combining different tests including the new biomarkers could increase the reliability of the tests for the diagnosis of IBI in these patients.
Authors: Peter Paul C Lim; Dayle J Bondarev; Amy M Edwards; Claudia M Hoyen; Charles G Macias Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Dorine M Borensztajn; Nienke N Hagedoorn; Irene Rivero Calle; Ian K Maconochie; Ulrich von Both; Enitan D Carrol; Juan Emmanuel Dewez; Marieke Emonts; Michiel van der Flier; Ronald de Groot; Jethro Herberg; Benno Kohlmaier; Emma Lim; Federico Martinon-Torres; Daan Nieboer; Ruud G Nijman; Marko Pokorn; Franc Strle; Maria Tsolia; Clementien Vermont; Shunmay Yeung; Dace Zavadska; Werner Zenz; Michael Levin; Henriette A Moll Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rajvinder Khasriya; William Barcella; Maria De Iorio; Sheela Swamy; Kiren Gill; Anthony Kupelian; James Malone-Lee Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 2.894