Rhizodeposition of nitrogen and carbon by mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) and its contribution to intercropped oats (Avena nuda L.).

Compounds released by mungbean roots potentially represent an enormous source of nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) in mungbean-oat intercropping systems. In this study, an in situ experiment was conducted using a 15N - 13C double stem-feeding method to measure N and C derived from the rhizodeposition (NdfR and CdfR) of mungbean and their transfer to oats in an intercropping system. Mungbean plants were sole cropped (S) or intercropped (I) with oat. The plants were labeled 5 weeks after planting and were harvested at the beginning of pod setting (Ip and Sp) and at maturity (Im and Sm). More than 60% and 50% of the applied 15N and 13C, respectively, were recovered in each treatment, with 15N and 13C being quite uniformly distributed in the different plant parts. NdfR represented 9.8% (Sp), 9.2% (Ip), 20.1% (Sm), and 21.2% (Im) of total mungbean plant N, whereas CdfR represented 13.3% (Sp), 42.0% (Ip), 15.4% (Sm), and 22.6% (Im) of total mungbean plant C. When considering the part of rhizodeposition transferred to associated oat, intercropping mungbean released more NdfR and CdfR than mungbean alone. About 53.4-83.2% of below-ground plant N (BGP-N) and 58.4-85.9% of BGP-C originated from NdfR and CdfR, respectively. The N in oats derived from mungbean increased from 7.6% at the pod setting stage to 9.7% at maturity, whereas the C in oats increased from 16.2% to 22.0%, respectively. Only a small percentage of rhizodeposition from mungbean was transferred to oats in the intercropping systems, with a large percentage remaining in the soil. This result indicates that mungbean rhizodeposition might contribute to higher N and C availability in the soil for subsequent crops.

Introduction

Legume-cereal intercropping is an agronomic technique that is known to potentially improve crop yield by increasing resource use efficiency, and has been widely and consistently used in China. This cropping systems has facilitated sustainable and organic food-production systems [1, 2]. Most existing studies on legume-cereal intercropping systems have focused on quantifying the amount of N2 fixation and <n class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) transfer and acquisition [3]. However, information about the overall turnover of rhizodeposition in the intercropping systems and <spn>an class="Chemical">carbon (C) transfer from legumes to cereals remains limited.

Rhizodeposition is defined as all root-derived compounds and plant materials that are released from living roots during plant growth [4, 5]. A wide range of organic compounds are involved in this process [6, 7], including inorganic ions, sloughed cells, and root hairs [8]. Thus, rhizodeposition has diverse functions in plant nutrition and soil ecology, such as improving nutrient availability, acting as allelochemicals, and serving as a <span class="Chemical">carbonn> and energy source for rhizosphere soil microorganisms [9]. Previous studies on rhizodeposition have focused on mono-cropping systems and were generally performed under greenhouse or laboratory conditions. Different 15N-labeling techniques have been used to measure the amount of N rhizodeposition, including 15N leaf feeding [10-12], <span class="Chemical">15N petiole feeding [13, 14], 15N stem injection [15], 15N2 and 15NH3 atmospheric labeling [16-18], and the split-root technique [19-22]. To estimate the rhizodeposition of C, photoassimilates labeled with 14CO2 or 13CO2 have been used to trace the flow of C into the soil and to monitor its further transformation [23-27]. Few studies have used both C and N tracers to investigate rhizodeposition, particularly under field conditions [28, 29]. Russell and Fillery [30] developed an in situ stem labeling method, in which an isotope solution is taken up by the whole plant via a cotton wick that passes through the plant stem. This method has been previously applied for the 13C-15N double labeling of peas and oats by using a glucose-urea mixed solution [29, 31]. Unlike other in situ shoot feeding techniques [32, 33], this method facilitates relatively uniform isotope enrichment and high total recovery rates [34]. In addition, this technique does not cause root damage, unlike the split-root method [35], making it appropriate for C and N rhizodeposition research under field conditions.

It has been reported that legume rhizodeposition N at maturity varies from 4% to 71.1% of total plant n class="Chemical">N [13, 19, 21–22, 29–31], and is higher compared with non-legumes, because of N2-fixation [29]. Khan et al. [13] showed that N rhizodeposition by mungbean represents 17% of total plant N. Below-ground N transfer from the cowpea to millet in intercropping was demonstrated under field conditions, with significant levels of approx. 10 kg N ha-1 [33]. In addition, 19% of N in barley acquired from intercropped peas was also reported [20]. Existing studies show that about 40% of the net fixed C is allocated below ground [36], while around 11% is retained in rhizodepostion [37]. More than 20% of the total assimilated plant C is released from roots via rhizodeposition during the vegetative period of different plant species [9]. About one-third of the below-ground carbon becomes CO2 by root respiration and microbial utilization [36]. The remaining part of below-ground translocated C may be incorporated into the soil organic matter or microbial biomass. However, this information was obtained from sole cropping systems. Our understanding of the part of C transferred to crops in intercropping systems remains limited.

<span class="Species">Mungbeann> (<span class="Species">Vigna radiata L.) is an important food and economic crop throughout China. This crop grows over a wide range of agro-climatic zones in the country. Baicheng is the largest <span class="Species">mungbean producing area in northeastern China. Intercropping mungbean with oats (Avena nuda L.) is recommended in this area to control wind-driven soil erosion and to increase productivity [38, 39]. However, our understanding of mungbean rhizodeposition in the soil and its transfer to intercropped oats under field conditions remains limited.

The objectives of this study were to (1) quantify N and C rhizodeposition, uptake, and distribution in the different plant parts of <n class="Chemical">span class="Species">mungbean and <spn>an class="Species">oats under field conditions by using the stem double-labeling method, (2) quantify N and C transfer from mungbean to oats in an intercropping system, and (3) compare N and C rhizodeposition of mungbean and their transfer to intercropped oats at different growth stages.

Materials and Methods

Study site

The experiment was conducted at the farm of Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Baicheng, Jilin, China (45° 37′N, 122° 48′E, 152 m above sea level). The local climate is temperate continental monsoon, with an average annual rainfall of 407.9 mm. During the experimental period in 2011, precipitation was 231.4 mm, and the average temperature was 20.2°C. The soil is a chernozem and was collected from a field that had been fallow for 5 years. The soil chemical properties, rainfall, and temperature at the site between June and September 2011 are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1, ren class="Chemical">spectively.

Table 1

Soil chemical properties, sampled at 0–30 cm depth.

Soil parameters
pH (H2O)	7.2
Organic matter (g kg-1)	14.7
Total N (g kg-1)	0.8
Available N (mg kg-1)	59.6
Available P (mg kg-1)	9.9
Available K (mg kg-1)	76.6

The methodology of soil analysis used were: pH (potentiometric analysis), Organic matter (potassium bichromate titrimetric method), Total N (the Kjeldahl), Available N (Alkaline hydrolysis diffusion), Available P (Mo-Sb colorimetric method), Available K (flame photometric meter method)

Fig 1

Daily rainfall and average temperature during the experimental period (2011).

The dots represent the different activities. PM: plant mungbean, PO: plant oat, L: labelling, PS: mungbean at pod setting, M: mungbean at maturity.

The methodology of soil analysis used were: pH (potentiometric analysis), <span class="Disease">Organic mattern> (<span class="Chemical">potassium bichromate titrimetric method), Total N (the Kjeldahl), Available N (Alkaline hydrolysis diffusion), Available P (Mo-Sb colorimetric method), Available K (flame photometric meter method)

The dots represent the different activities. PM: plant <span class="Species">mungbeann>, PO: plant oat, L: labelling, PS: <span class="Species">mungbean at pod setting, M: <span class="Species">mungbean at maturity.

Experimental design and 13C-15N double labeling

In the spring of 2011, 16 <n class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">polyvinyl chloride plastic (PVC) columns (diameter, 20 cm; length, 55 cm) with a plastic pallet (diameter, 25 cm) at the bottom were buried in the field. The surface soil (0–30 cm) from the field was collected, air-dried, and passed through a 3 mm sieve to remove gravel and plant residue. About 19 kg of the dry soil was placed in each column and <spn>an class="Chemical">watered daily to maintain a water holding capacity of between 40 and 80%.

The experiment was established in a RCBD (randomized complete block design) with 4 replicates for each treatment. Ten columns were used for intercropping of <span class="Species">mungbeann> with <span class="Species">oats, of which 8 were used for the label treatment and 2 for the control. The other 10 columns were used for sole <span class="Species">mungbean cropping, of which 8 were used for the label treatment and 2 for the control. Six oat and 6 mungbean seeds were sown in each intercropped column and thinned to 2 oat and 2 mungbean seedlings after emergence. The intercropping treatment was planted as shown in Fig. 2. Six mungbean seeds were sown in the mono-cropped columns and thinned to 2 plants per column after emergence. Corresponding to each 15N and 13C labeling treatment, an unlabeled control treatment was planted and harvested the same as the pot treatment to obtain background values of 15N and 13C for the different plant and soil parts (as show in Fig. 2).

Fig 2

How the crops were planted in the plastic (PVC) columns for solo and intercropping treatment.

The triangles stand for mungbeans and the quadrangles stand for oats.

The triangles stand for <span class="Species">mungbeann>s and the quadrangles stand for <span class="Species">oats.

The <span class="Species">mungbeann> variety used in this experiment was Bailv 11, which matures in about 100 days, while the oat variety was Baiyan 2, which matures in about 85 days. Both varieties were provided by Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences. <span class="Species">Mungbean was planted on June 29 after accelerated germination, whereas the <span class="Species">oats were planted 20 days later. This planting technique is the normal practice in the study area.

The isotope feeding method used in this experiment was the <span class="Chemical">15n class="Chemical">N-13C double-labeling method [29, 34, 40]. In brief, a needle was used to pass a cotton wick through the stem at approximately 3 cm above the soil surface. The end of the wick was inserted into a 1.5-mL liquid chromatography injection bottle that contained the labeling liquid. Transpn>iration was prevented by covering the wick with a soft plastic tube, except for the part that was inserted into the stem. The labeling solution was 0.2% (w/v) <span class="Chemical">15N enriched (99 atom%) <span class="Chemical">urea and 4% (w/v) 13C enriched (99 atom%) glucose. The solutions were prepared separately using sterile deionized water under aseptic conditions at twice the target concentration, and were mixed together in the injection bottle when the labeling system was set. All of the materials used in the system were sterilized for 20 min at 121°C.

Measurements were performed in 2 stages; namely, <span class="Species">mungbeann> pod setting and maturation. Therefore, a total of 4 measurements were performed when combined with the cropping methods; namely, <span class="Chemical">Sp = <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at pod setting; Sm = mungbean harvested at maturity; Ip = intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting; and Im = intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity. Sp, Ip, and the respective controls were harvested at the onset of mungbean pod setting (August 24, 2011), whereas Sm, Im, and the respective controls were harvested at mungbean maturity (September 19, 2011).

<span class="Species">Mungbeann> was labeled twice at weekly intervals starting on the fifth week after planting (August 7, 2011). For each labeling, 1 mL labeling solution was used. Furthermore, absorption of all the solute by the plant was ensured by adding a further 1 mL of deionized <span class="Chemical">water twice after the solution had been taken up by the plants. The vials were placed for 24 h and 48 h (depending on the speed of uptake) and were removed after the completion of labeling. After labeling, a 1-mm mesh was placed on the ground around the labeled plants to collect any fallen leaves and to prevent the soil from being enriched by plant material contaminants.

Plant and soil sampling

During sample collection, the whole of the above-ground plants (AGP) were directly cut above the soil surface. <span class="Species">Mungbeann> was separated into the leaves, stems, and pods, while the AGP of <span class="Species">oats was sampled as a single plant part. The soil and roots were also sampled at the same time. First, the columns were removed from the field, the top of each column was sealed with a plastic bag, and the soil from each column was weighed and placed on a plastic sheet. Subsequently, the soil was passed through a 2-mm sieve, and all visible roots were collected manually. The sieved soil was thoroughly mixed, and a 300-g soil sample was obtained for analysis. A sub-sample of 100 g was dried at 60°C for at least 72 h to determine the weight, and <span class="Chemical">13C and 15N contents. The other 200 g was washed using a 200-μm sieve to determine the amount of remaining rootlets. After the samples were dried at 60°C for at least 72 h, the weight was determined. The samples were then ground to a fine powder using a centrifuge mill and a ball mill, the total N and C content and 15N and 13C enrichment in the plant and soil samples were determined using an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Vario EL, Elementar, Germany) coupled with a Vario PYRO Cube Elemental analyzer. Plant samples were dried at 105°C for 1.5 h and at 60°C to constant weight, the dry weight was determined.

Calculations and statistical analysis

The percentage of soil N and C derived from rhizodeposition (%<n class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">NdfR and %CdfR, respectively) was calculated using the following equations [41]: The quantities of NdfR and CdfR were calculated as follows [29, 34]:

N and C transfer from the labeled <n class="Chemical">span class="Species">mungbean to <spn>an class="Species">oats was measured by comparing 15N and 13C atoms in the mungbean roots and in the receiver’s (oat) biomass. The control was the reference unlabeled crop. The proportion of N and C in the oat AGP and roots was calculated using the following equation [33]:

In this experiment the receiver means <span class="Species">oatsn> and labeled plants were <span class="Species">mungbean, while the control means the corresponding unlabeled plants. The quantities of N and C that were transferred to the <span class="Species">oats were calculated as follows [33]:

The average data and errors were calculated by Microsoft Excel (Version 2010; Microsoft Inc., USA), while SigmaPlot (Version 12.5; Systat Software Inc., USA) was used to compile the Fig. 1. The equations were edited by MathType (Version 6.0, Design Science Inc., California, USA). The significant effect was compared using Tukey's HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) test at p < 0.05. The analyses of variance were performed using JMP (Version 9.0, SAS Institute Inc., USA) to determine the treatment effects.

Results

Recovery and distribution of 15N and 13C

<span class="Chemical">15n class="Chemical">N enrichment was the highest in the stem fraction, followed by the grain, leaves, and roots for <spn>an class="Species">mungbean, and was the lowest in the AGP and root fraction of oats. 15N enrichment was generally below 0.3 atom% 15N excess. However, atom% 15N excess of the different plant parts did not show any significant difference between treatments (p < 0.05). The total recovery of applied 15N was between 62% and 82%, and it was slightly higher at maturity than at pod setting, but there was no significant difference between different treatments (p < 0.05). More than 80% of the recovered isotopes were present in the above-ground parts of mungbean. The amount of 15N that was recovered increased from pod setting to maturity in the grains, but decreased in the stems, leaves, and below-ground plant (BGP) fractions over the same period. At the pod setting stage, more than 60% of the recovered 15N was detected in the leaves and stems of mungbean. Less 15N was recovered in the intercropping system than in the sole cropping system. At maturity, more than half of the recovered 15N was detected in mungbean grains, which was 3 times higher than that recorded at pod setting. The amount of 15N recovered from rhizodeposition increased over time, with a maximum of 9.82% and 7.06% 15N being recovered from Sm and Im, respectively, with 0.53% of recovered 15N being found in the intercropped oats (Table 2).

Table 2

Atom% 15N excess, recovery and distribution of 15N in each part of plant and soil in sole cropped and intercropped systems.

		Mungbean				Oat
		Grain	Stem	Leaves	Roots	AGP 1	Roots	Rhizodeposition	Total
Atom% 13C excess	Sp	0.04±0.02a	0.25±0.06a	0.08±0.02a	0.08±0.01a	-	-	-	-
	Ip	0.03±0.00a	0.25±0.04a	0.05±0.02a	0.10±0.01a	0.003±0.000a	0.02±0.00a	-	-
	Sm	0.02±0.00a	0.20±0.04a	0.05±0.02a	0.12±0.07a	-	-	-	-
	Im	0.02±0.00a	0.19±0.05a	0.06±0.02a	0.07±0.00a	0.001±0.000b	0.01±0.00b	-	-
Recovery of 13C (in % of applied)	Sp	1.59±0.07a	33.99±4.90ab	11.97±2.82a	3.52±0.05a	-	-	4.82±3.24a	55.88±8.23a
	Ip	2.70±1.44a	36.47±6.07a	8.20±3.37ab	5.27±5.45a	0.04±0.03a	0.08±0.00a	14.54±11.35a	67.30±11.25a
	Sm	6.88±1.59a	22.44±6.00c	4.68±1.69b	5.46±3.20a	-	-	11.08±8.62a	50.54±11.91a
	Im	7.74±5.89a	24.80±2.75bc	5.72±0.92b	2.64±1.32a	0.07±0.03a	0.11±0.06a	11.00±6.13a	52.10±7.35a
Distribution of recovered 13C (%)	Sp	2.84±1.07b	60.91±3.64a	21.25±2.51a	6.41±1.30a	-	-	8.59±5.11a	100
	Ip	4.18±2.43ab	55.27±12.18a	12.42±5.42b	7.52±6.69a	0.06±0.04a	0.13±0.02a	20.43±16.59a	100
	Sm	14.07±4.03ab	45.38±11.69a	9.34±2.71b	10.96±6.11a	-	-	20.24±10.75a	100
	Im	14.62±9.73a	48.47±9.39a	11.04±1.38b	4.97±2.03a	0.15±0.06a	0.23±0.16a	20.53±9.59a	100

1 Above-ground part

Mungbean were labeled five weeks after planting and harvested at the beginning of pod setting and at maturity. Mungbean were divided into grain, stem, leaves and root, while oats were divided into above-ground part and root, and rhizodeposition.

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. Sp: sole mungbean harvested at pod setting, Sm: sole mungbean harvested at maturity, Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity. Values are means±standard error (n = 4). Values with different letters within a column indicate significant differences between the treatment Sp, Ip, Sm and Im (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).

<span class="Species">Mungbeann> were labeled five weeks after planting and harvested at the beginning of pod setting and at maturity. <span class="Species">Mungbean were divided into grain, stem, leaves and root, while <span class="Species">oats were divided into above-ground part and root, and rhizodeposition.

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. <span class="Chemical">Spn>: sole <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at pod setting, Sm: sole <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at maturity, Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity. Values are means±standard error (n = 4). Values with different letters within a column indicate significant differences between the treatment Sp, Ip, Sm and Im (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).

<span class="Chemical">13Cn> enrichment was similar to <span class="Chemical">15N enrichment, with no significant difference between the different treatments (p < 0.05). <span class="Chemical">13C enrichment ranged between 0.001 atom% 13C excess and 0.25 atom% 13C excess, and was the highest in the mungbean stem fraction. More than 70% of the recovered isotopes were present in the above-ground parts of mungbean. The amount of 13C recovered from rhizodeposition in the Ip treatment was 20.62% (including the C transferred to oats), which was twice that of the Sp treatment. In both the Sm and Im treatments, about 20% of the recovered 13C was detected in the BGP. The recovered 13C in the intercropped oats was 0.19% and 0.38% of the total recovered 13C at pod setting and maturity, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3

Atom% 13C excess, recovery and distribution of 13C in each part of plant and soil in sole cropped and intercropped systems.

		Mungbean				Oat
		Grain	Stem	Leaves	Roots	AGP 1	Roots	Rhizodeposition	Total
Atom% 13C excess	Sp	0.04±0.02a	0.25±0.06a	0.08±0.02a	0.08±0.01a	-	-	-	-
	Ip	0.03±0.00a	0.25±0.04a	0.05±0.02a	0.10±0.01a	0.003±0.000a	0.02±0.00a	-	-
	Sm	0.02±0.00a	0.20±0.04a	0.05±0.02a	0.12±0.07a	-	-	-	-
	Im	0.02±0.00a	0.19±0.05a	0.06±0.02a	0.07±0.00a	0.001±0.000b	0.01±0.00b	-	-
Recovery of 13C (in % of applied)	Sp	1.59±0.07a	33.99±4.90ab	11.97±2.82a	3.52±0.05a	-	-	4.82±3.24a	55.88±8.23a
	Ip	2.70±1.44a	36.47±6.07a	8.20±3.37ab	5.27±5.45a	0.04±0.03a	0.08±0.00a	14.54±11.35a	67.30±11.25a
	Sm	6.88±1.59a	22.44±6.00c	4.68±1.69b	5.46±3.20a	-	-	11.08±8.62a	50.54±11.91a
	Im	7.74±5.89a	24.80±2.75bc	5.72±0.92b	2.64±1.32a	0.07±0.03a	0.11±0.06a	11.00±6.13a	52.10±7.35a
Distribution of recovered 13C (%)	Sp	2.84±1.07b	60.91±3.64a	21.25±2.51a	6.41±1.30a	-	-	8.59±5.11a	100
	Ip	4.18±2.43ab	55.27±12.18a	12.42±5.42b	7.52±6.69a	0.06±0.04a	0.13±0.02a	20.43±16.59a	100
	Sm	14.07±4.03ab	45.38±11.69a	9.34±2.71b	10.96±6.11a	-	-	20.24±10.75a	100
	Im	14.62±9.73a	48.47±9.39a	11.04±1.38b	4.97±2.03a	0.15±0.06a	0.23±0.16a	20.53±9.59a	100

1 Above-ground part

Mungbean were labeled five weeks after planting and harvested at the beginning of pod setting and at maturity. Mungbean were divided into grain, stem, leaves and root, while oats were divided into above-ground part and root, and rhizodeposition.

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. Sp: sole mungbean harvested at pod setting, Sm: sole mungbean harvested at maturity, Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity. Values are means±standard error (n = 4). Values with different letters within a column indicate significant differences between the treatment Sp, Ip, Sm and Im (Tukey HSD, p<0.05). yyyy

<span class="Species">Mungbeann> were labeled five weeks after planting and harvested at the beginning of pod setting and at maturity. <span class="Species">Mungbean were divided into grain, stem, leaves and root, while <span class="Species">oats were divided into above-ground part and root, and rhizodeposition.

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. <span class="Chemical">Spn>: sole <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at pod setting, Sm: sole <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at maturity, Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity. Values are means±standard error (n = 4). Values with different letters within a column indicate significant differences between the treatment Sp, Ip, Sm and Im (Tukey HSD, p<0.05). yyyy

Quantity and partitioning of N and C

<span class="Species">Mungbeann> <span class="Disease">dry matter showed no significant difference in the sole or intercropping systems. However, significantly more <span class="Disease">dry matter was obtained at the mature stage in mungbean grains and leaves (p < 0.05) (Table 4). At the pod setting stage, NdfR represented 9.8% and 9.2% of the total N, contributing to 57.2% and 53.4% of BGP-N, in the Sp and Ip treatments, respectively. When combined with the N transferred to the intercropped oat, the total NdfR in Ip was 97.0 mg plant-1, which was 3.7% higher than that in Sp. About 40% of the C in Ip was detected in the BGP fraction, which was more than fifth that of the corresponding sole cropping treatment. In addition, CdfR was higher than NdfR, representing 13.3% and 42.0% of total C, contributing to 58.4% and 85.9% of BGP-C, in the Sp and Ip treatments, respectively. After adding the C that was transferred to intercropped oats, the total C derived from rhizodeposition was 10.15 g plant-1 in Ip, which was almost 6 times that of Sp, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 4

Mungbean dry matter in each part of sole cropped and intercropped plants.

	Sp	Ip	Sm	Im
Mungbean
Grain	3.69±2.48 b	5.80±1.82 b	26.44±3.23 a	23.54±3.37 a
Stem	8.18±0.87 a	10.44±3.62 a	10.41±1.51 a	11.01±1.10 a
Leaves	8.01±0.51 b	8.55±2.45 b	11.78±0.50 a	11.88±1.14 a
Roots	3.43±0.39 a	4.26±0.00 a	3.28±0.22 a	3.16±1.15 a

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. Sp: sole mungbean harvested at pod setting, Sm: sole mungbean harvested at maturity, Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity.

Values are means±standard error (n = 4).Values with different letters within a line indicate significant differences between the means (Tukey HSD, p <0.05).

Table 5

Nitrogen and carbon content in each part of mungbean, and the transfer to rhizodeposition and intercropped oat.

	Nitrogen content (mg plant-1)				Carbon content (g plant-1)
	Sp	Ip	Sm	Im	Sp	Ip	Sm	Im
Mungbean
Grain	145.3±92.2b	229.6±70.5b	875.5±144.7a	823.5±149.3a	1.60±1.10b	2.59±0.83b	11.83±1.46a	10.58±1.55a
Stem	191.2±28.7a	198.0±42.8a	104.4±50.1b	115.0±47.2b	4.35±0.66a	4.60±0.45a	3.41±0.38b	4.39±1.55b
Leaves	454.9±42.2a	415.1±58.3a	171.0±12.4b	201.0±82.5b	4.98±0.23a	5.01±0.48a	3.01±0.27a	3.37±1.02a
Roots	69.7±12.8a	79.7±4.0a	65.0±6.6a	58.5±19.5a	1.34±0.11a	1.59±0.09a	1.36±0.12a	1.19±0.36a
Oat
AGP 1	-	0.5±0.4b	-	5.5±1.2a	-	0.03±0.02b	-	0.45±0.38a
Roots	-	2.4±1.4a	-	7.3±3.7a	-	0.06±0.03a	-	0.06±0.03a
Rhizodeposition	93.5±56.3a	94.1±76.4a	306.1±365.6a	326.4±27.6a	1.88±1.36a	10.06±12.48a	3.58±2.71a	6.28±4.80a
Total	954.7±232.2a	1019.3±253.8a	1522.0±579.4a	1537.4±331.1a	14.14±3.46a	24.34±14.59a	23.19±4.93a	27.83±10.04a

1 Above-ground part

The data of mungbean in this table means the total N and C content of mungbean. The data of oat in this table means the N and C derived from mungbean. Mungbean were labelled five weeks after planting and harvested at the beginning of pod setting and at maturity. Mungbean were divided into grain, stem, leaves and root, while oats were divided into above-ground part and root, and rhizodeposition.

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. Sp: sole mungbean harvested at pod setting, Sm: sole mungbean harvested at maturity, Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity. Values are means±standard error (n = 4). Values with different letters within a line indicate significant differences between the treatment Sp, Ip, Sm and Im (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. <span class="Chemical">Spn>: sole <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at pod setting, Sm: sole <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at maturity, Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity.

The data of <span class="Species">mungbeann> in this table means the total N and C content of <span class="Species">mungbean. The data of oat in this table means the N and C derived from <span class="Species">mungbean. Mungbean were labelled five weeks after planting and harvested at the beginning of pod setting and at maturity. Mungbean were divided into grain, stem, leaves and root, while oats were divided into above-ground part and root, and rhizodeposition.

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. <span class="Chemical">Spn>: sole <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at pod setting, Sm: sole <span class="Species">mungbean harvested at maturity, Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity. Values are means±standard error (n = 4). Values with different letters within a line indicate significant differences between the treatment Sp, Ip, Sm and Im (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).

The <span class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">NdfR was higher at maturity in both the sole and intercropping treatments, representing 20.1% and 21.2% of total N, and contributing to 82.5% and 83.2% of the <spn>an class="Chemical">BGP-N, respectively. When combined with the amount of N transferred to oats, total NdfR was 10.8% higher in Im compared to Sm. The C derived from rhizodeposition in the Sm and Im treatments represented 15.4% and 22.6% of total recovered C, accounting for 72.8% and 79.2% of BGP-C, respectively (Table 5).

N and C transfer from mungbean to intercropped oat

In the Im treatment, the N content of the AGP and roots of <n class="Chemical">span class="Species">oats was 131.8 mg plant-1 and 20.4 mg plant-1, respn>ectively. These values were about 3 times higher than those in the Ip treatment. In the AGP of <span class="Species">oats, 0.5 and 5.5 mg plant-1 N was derived from <span class="Species">mungbean in treatments Ip and Im, which represented 1.5% and 4.6% N content, respectively. In addition, the total N derived from mungbean was significantly higher in treatment Im compared to Ip (p < 0.05). The percentage of N derived from mungbean in oats increased from 7.6% at pod setting to 9.7% at maturity (Table 6).

Table 6

N and C content in intercropping oat and derived from mungbean.

	N content in oat (mg plant-1)		N derived from mungbean (mg plant-1)		N derived from mungbean (%)		C content in oat (mg plant-1)		C derived from mungbean (mg plant-1)		C derived from mungbean (%)
	Ip	Im	Ip	Im	Ip	Im	Ip	Im	Ip	Im	Ip	Im
AGP 1	43.2±21.7a	131.8±55.0a	0.5±0.4b	5.5±1.2a	1.5±1.3a	4.6±2.1a	0.42±0.22b	1.73±0.64a	0.03±0.02a	0.45±0.38a	8.2±5.1a	24.5±13.1a
Root	9.7±0.0b	20.4±2.4a	2.4±1.4a	7.3±3.7a	30.7±8.6a	37.4±21.2a	0.16±0.00b	0.51±0.09a	0.06±0.03a	0.06±0.03a	37.4±16.3a	12.5±8.3b
Total	52.9±21.7b	152.3±57.3b	2.9±1.3b	12.8±3.3a	7.6±4.3a	9.7±5.2a	0.58±0.22b	2.24±0.72a	0.09±0.04a	0.51±0.35a	16.2±6.4a	22.0±9.5a

1 Above-ground part

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. Ip: intercropping system harvested at mungbean pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at mungbean maturity. Values are means±standard error (n = 4). Values with different letters within a line indicate significant differences between treatment Ip and Im (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).

The abbreviation in the table represent different treatments. Ip: intercropping system harvested at <span class="Species">mungbeann> pod setting, and Im: intercropping system harvested at <span class="Species">mungbean maturity. Values are means±standard error (n = 4). Values with different letters within a line indicate significant differences between treatment Ip and Im (Tukey HSD, p<0.05).

The C content in the AGP of <span class="Species">oatsn> in the Ip and Im treatments was 0.42 and 1.73 g plant-1, respectively. In comparison, the corresponding values of the roots were 0.16 and 0.51 g plant-1. In the oat AGP fraction, 0.03 and 0.45 g plant-1 C was transferred from mungbean in the Ip and Im treatments, representing 8.2% and 24.5% of oat AGP-C, respectively. In addition, the ratio of transferred C from mungbean to oats in relation to total C in <span class="Species">oats was 16.2% at pod setting and 22.0% at maturity (Table 6).

Discussion

Recovery of 15N and 13C

Less than 70% <span class="Chemical">15n class="Chemical">N was recovered from the <spn>an class="Chemical">Sp, Ip, and Sm treatments, which was lower than that obtained by similar studies conducted under controlled conditions, in which recovery rates of more than 80% were reported [29, 30, 34, 40]. However, this level was higher than that reported by previous studies conducted under field conditions, in which the recovery rates were reported to be about 60% [29].

The <span class="Chemical">15n class="Chemical">N that was not recovered in the plant-soil system might have been lost because of experimental errors in the mass balance between the calculated <spn>an class="Chemical">15N added through labeling and its recovery from the various plant parts [34, 42], or loss as NH3 in urea solution from the wick system. The latter explanation was probably the most likely in this experiment. Specifically, at the first application, the 15N urea solution was taken up by the plants in less than 1 day, whereas the speed of uptake declined markedly during the second application, requiring at least 2 days. In addition, the recovery rates were higher at maturity than at pod setting, which might be attributed to the lower amount of 15N lost in the plant-soil system after pod setting.

Relatively higher amounts of applied <span class="Chemical">13Cn> (more than 50%) were recovered in our study compared to that reported by similar field studies [29]. However, lower amounts of <span class="Chemical">13C were recovered compared to <span class="Chemical">15N, which might be partly attributed to the loss of assimilated 13C as CO2, due to either plant or microbial respiration [5, 36]. There are two possible explanations for the lower recovery of 13C at maturity than at pod setting in our study. First, the continued loss of 13C as CO2, supporting previous studies on pea and oat [29]. Second, the solution remained in the plant-soil system for a long time, resulting in an increase in the loss of the applied isotope by microorganisms. Therefore, short-term labeling has advantages over long-term labeling under field conditions, with the short time between labeling and sampling yielding better isotope recovery rates [13].

Suitability of the 15N-13C double-labeling method in the intercropping system

To our knowledge, this is the first study in which the cotton-wick method was used for the <span class="Chemical">15n class="Chemical">N-13C double labeling of an intercropping system. This technology allowed the higher recovery of <spn>an class="Chemical">15N and 13C and did not damage the root structure, which is a drawback of the split-root method [35]. The results of our study showed relatively higher and uniform isotope enrichment of mungbean plants, which was sufficient to trace the 15N and 13C in intercropped oat AGP and root fractions (Table 2 and 3). However, the plants in the intercropping system were not homogeneously labeled, with oat fractions (receiver) having lower enrichment than mungbean fractions. This difference may have been a consequence of higher enrichment closer to the label source, which influenced the distribution of the isotope in plants [14]. This trend has also been recorded in other 15N labeling experiments that used stem feeding [29, 34] and root labeling [19].

Furthermore, estimation of rhizodeposition by using Janzen and Bruisma’s equation needs to be performed carefully, particularly when the pulsed labeling method is used, because of the assumptions supporting the calculations [29, 43]. According to Mahieu et al. [44], rhizodeposition is overestimated for plants subject to the pulse-labeling technique compared to the continuous-labeling method. Labeling experiments lasting more than 1 year need be conducted, because short-term studies may be strongly affected by the weather and other uncontrollable factors.

The <span class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">NdfR (at both pod setting and maturity) was lower for <spn>an class="Species">mungbean than for peas labeled using similar methods [29, 31]. However, the percentage of NdfR at maturity was higher for mungbean than for peas, faba beans, and lupin that were labeled using a similar method [34], as well as for mungbean (17%) from a pot experiment performed using the petiole-feeding method [45], peas labeled using the split-root method [19, 21, 22], and alfalfa and soybean labeled under sterile conditions [46]. These differences indicate that the experimental conditions, labeling methods, and environment factors strongly influence NdfR estimates.

The <span class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">NdfR was 3 times higher at the mature stage than at the pod stage. These results are consistent with those recorded for the pea (Pisum sariuum L.) by Jensen [19] using the spn>lit-root method, with lower <span class="Chemical">NdfR at flowering than at maturity. However, our results contradicted those of Wichern et al. [29], who used a similar method. In addition, more <span class="Chemical">NdfR was obtained in the intercropping system than in the sole cropping system, particularly at maturity. However, the dry matter of mungbean was not significantly different between the sole and intercropping system (Table 4). These results indicate that the N transferred to oats increases the NdfR of mungbean and might strengthen N-fixation. Furthermore, the ratio of NdfR to BGP-N in mungbean was similar to that reported in a previous study [13].

Overall, lower <span class="Chemical">CdfRn> to total plant C was obtained for <span class="Species">mungbean than for pea at both the pod and mature stages [29], but was higher than that for cereal and grasses reported in other studies [36, 47, 48]. This result might be attributed to the strong rhizodeposition ability of legumes compared to that of cereals, in addition to differences in the root construction and rhizospheric microorganisms of different plants. However, higher amounts of <span class="Chemical">CdfR were obtained in the present study compared to those obtained by Wichern et al. [29] for peas and oats, despite the same method being used. A higher percentage of CdfR to total plant C was obtained in the mungbean-oat intercropping system than in the sole mungbean cropping system, under similar mungbean dry matter content (Table 4). This is because the transfer of C to intercropped oats enhanced the release of mungbean CdfR in the intercropping system.

N and C transfer from labeled mungbean to oat plants

The labeling method used in the current study has been previously used to evaluate C and N rhizodeposition in field and laboratory studies [14, 29–31, 34, 40, 49, 50]. However, to our knowledge, this study is the first time the cotton-wick method was used to evaluate rhizodeposition and the transfer of C and n class="Chemical">N in a mungbean-oat intercropping system. The current study showed that N transfer represents more than 7% of total N in associated oats, particularly in the roots, which accounted for more than one-third of N transfer. Furthermore, the amount of N that was transferred to oats increased over time. Less N was transferred from mungbean to oats in this study than that reported in previous studies performed using the direct labeling method [51, 52] or other approaches [19]. For example, several experiments of intercropped barley and peas reported that 19% of N in barley was acquired from peas by using the split-root method [20]. However, other studies found little or no evidence of N transfer in legume-cereal intercropping systems [2, 49, 53, 54]. Thus, the mechanism of N transfer from legumes to cereal crops might be different, because of differences in plant photosynthesis intensity, root intermingling, and nodule activity.

In this study, <span class="Species">mungbeann> contributed to 16.2% and 22.0% of total C uptake by <span class="Species">oats at the pod setting and mature stages, respectively. The oat plants were at the filling stage when <span class="Species">mungbean plants were mature. Thus, the strong nutritional need of oats at this stage led to a strong nutrient absorbing ability, which resulted in a higher proportion of C being present at harvest. Most previous studies have focused on the below-ground C of monocropping systems, and found part of the C was respired as CO2 incorporated into the soil organic matter or used by microbial [36]. However, these previous studies did not investigate the transfer of below-ground C in intercropping systems, even though the amount was comparatively low. Our result show that mungbean contributes to about 20% of the C in intercropped oat, and that this part of C cannot be easily neglect. The increased yield of non-legumes might be partly attributed to the amount of C transferred. Nevertheless, information about the importance of C transfer from legumes to non-legumes remains limited, we cannot easily coming to a conclusion.

Although our study provides new insights into the effects of intercropping <span class="Species">mungbeann> with <span class="Species">oats on <span class="Chemical">NdfR and CdfR, as well as the transfer of N and C from mungbean to associated oats, the exact mechanisms that influence the amount and quality of NdfR and CdfR during intercropping remain unknown. Moreover, considerable research is required to determine the dynamics of NdfR and CdfR during the plant growth period. Subsequent research should focus on the influence of intercropping on the release of NdfR and CdfR into different soil pools and their utilization by successive crops, by quantifying the nutritional benefit provided to subsequent crops in rotation. Other parameters that warrant further studies include the influence of genotypic variation on rhizodeposition in important crops, N and C transfer from plants to soil microorganisms, and the role of rhizodeposition on C sequestration and N nutrition.

Conclusions

The <span class="Species">mungbeann> and oat intercropping system can be efficiently labeled and studied using the in situ <span class="Chemical">15N-13C double stem-feeding method under field conditions, although maybe short term duration is one of the problems. This study showed that <span class="Species">mungbean NdfR contributes to more than half of BGP-N, whereas CdfR accounts for about 60% of BGP-C. In addition, intercropping and time extension can increase the NdfR and CdfR of mungbean. Furthermore, significant amounts of BGP-N were transferred from mungbean to oats in the intercropping system under field conditions, accounting for about 10% total N of associated oats, whereas C transfer accounted for about 20%. It shows the C transferred from mungbean to oats in the intercropping system should not be overlooked. The results of this study show that only a small proportion of rhizodeposition from mungbean is transferred to oats under the intercropping system, with a large portion remaining in the soil. This finding implies that mungbean rhizodeposition could represent a potentially large source of nutrients in the cropping systems of northeast China.

15N and 13C nature enrichment (‰) in the plant and soil parts.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.