Literature DB >> 25821949

Patterns of Use and Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Malignant Pheochromocytoma: A Population-Level Study.

P Goffredo1, M A Adam, S M Thomas, R P Scheri, J A Sosa, S A Roman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant pheochromocytoma is rare, and there is a scarcity of data on the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for treatment. The aims of this study were to analyze patterns of use of MIS for malignant pheochromocytoma in the U.S. and compare short-term outcomes to those of open adrenalectomy.
METHODS: Patients with malignant pheochromocytoma undergoing MIS, including laparoscopy, robotic assisted, laparoscopy converted to open, or open adrenalectomy, were culled from the National Cancer Database, from 1998 to 2011. Data were examined using simple summary statistics, Χ2 and student's t tests, Mann-Whitney test, and logistic regression.
RESULTS: A total of 36 MIS and 67 open adrenalectomies were identified in 2010-2011. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups in demographic characteristics or comorbidities. Preoperative diagnosis of malignancy was made in 52.8% of MIS and 48.5% of open patients (p=NS). MIS and open adrenalectomies did not differ with respect to lymph node metastases, vascular invasion, extra-adrenal-extension, and distant metastases (all p=NS). MIS tended to more often be used to perform partial adrenalectomy (38.9 vs. 20.4% open, p=0.061); surgical margins, 30-day readmission and mortality rates were similar to open adrenalectomy (all p=NS). Tumors removed via MIS were smaller (48.7 vs. 73.3 mm open, p=0.003) and associated with a shorter length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with malignant pheochromocytomas underwent MIS, with short-term outcomes which are comparable to those of open surgery. Further studies focused on long-term survival and recurrence are needed to assess the role of MIS in the management of these rare tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25821949     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3040-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Malignant pheochromocytoma: new malignancy criteria.

Authors:  Pierre de Wailly; Luigi Oragano; Francois Radé; Anthony Beaulieu; Vincent Arnault; Pierre Levillain; Jean Louis Kraimps
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Malignant pheochromocytoma: a review.

Authors:  Avital Harari; William B Inabnet
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of retroperitoneoscopic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Authors:  V A Constantinides; I Christakis; P Touska; F F Palazzo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy.

Authors:  H Bulus; H Y Uslu; R Karakoyun; S Koçak
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.090

5.  Iatrogenic pheochromocytomatosis: a previously unreported result of laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Authors:  M L Li; P A Fitzgerald; D C Price; J A Norton
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for malignant tumors.

Authors:  Masatoshi Eto; Masumitsu Hamaguchi; Masahiko Harano; Akira Yokomizo; Katsunori Tatsugami; Seiji Naito
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic adrenalectomy with open surgery for adrenal tumors.

Authors:  Hsun-Shuan Wang; Ching-Chia Li; Yii-Her Chou; Chii-Jye Wang; Wen-Jeng Wu; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours of 6 cm or greater.

Authors:  C N Parnaby; P S Chong; L Chisholm; J Farrow; J M Connell; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: case selection, surgical technique, and short-term outcome.

Authors:  Yao He; Zhi Chen; Yan-Cheng Luo; Xiao-Long Fang; Xiang Chen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 10.  The genetic basis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: implications for management.

Authors:  Brian Shuch; Christopher J Ricketts; Adam R Metwalli; Karel Pacak; W Marston Linehan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patterns of Use and Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Malignant Pheochromocytoma: A Population-Level Study.

Authors:  Chandan Kumar Jha; Anjali Mishra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Patterns of Use and Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Malignant Pheochromocytoma: A Population-Level Study: Reply.

Authors:  Paolo Goffredo; Mohamed A Adam; Julie Ann Sosa; Sanziana Roman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Risk factors for 30-day readmission after adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Anna C Beck; Paolo Goffredo; Imran Hassan; Sonia L Sugg; Geeta Lal; James R Howe; Ronald J Weigel
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.982

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.