Literature DB >> 25821779

The emerging role of complex modifications of tRNALysUUU in signaling pathways.

Patrick C Thiaville1, Valérie de Crécy-Lagard2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  GCN4; TOR; UPR; tRNA; thiolation

Year:  2015        PMID: 25821779      PMCID: PMC4374736          DOI: 10.15698/mic2015.01.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Cell        ISSN: 2311-2638


× No keyword cloud information.
The anticodon-stem-loop (ASL) of tRNAs drives decoding by interacting directly with the mRNA codon (Fig. 1). Modifications of the ASL are the most distinct and chemically complex of all RNA modifications 5. They are required for accurate codon recognition and translocation, enhance aminoacylation properties of tRNAs, and prevent ribosomal frameshifting 5. In eukaryotes, two of the most complex ASL modifications are N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t6A) and 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine (mcm5s2U). The first modification is found at position 37 of most tRNAs decoding ANN codons, just before the residue that interacts with the first base of the codon. The second modification is found at position 34, the residue that decodes the 3rd base of the codon, of tRNALysUUU, tRNAGluUUC, and tRNAGlnUUG (Fig. 1). Both these modifications are found in tRNALysUUU and affect translation efficiency 5. In addition, several other striking parallels can be made between the two. t6A and mcm5s2U are both synthesized by elaborate multimeric complexes that were first thought to be transcription factors. The KEOPS complex (Kinase, putative Endopeptidase and Other Proteins of Small size) in combination with Sua5 is involved in the synthesis of t6A 6, and the Elongator (ELP) complex in combination with the URM1 pathway enzymes (Uba4, Urm1, Ncs2/Ncs6) is involved in the synthesis of mcm5s2U 5. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants lacking t6A or mcm5s2U display many similar phenotypes. For example, telomere shortening is observed in the absence of either modification 78. In the case of ELP, it is now firmly established that most of the ELP phenotypes are due to the absence of the modified base, as the phenotypes are suppressed by overexpressing the tRNA targets 789. For example, the levels of the Sir4, a regulator involved in telomere maintenance and enriched in AAA (Lys) codons, are decreased in mcm5s2U deficient strains. Overexpression of tRNALysUUU suppresses the telomere shortening phenotype 8. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, key regulators, including the two subunits Atf1 and Pcr1 of the central regulator of the core environmental stress response 10 and the cell division regulator Cdr2 11, have an over-representation of AAA codons over other Lys codons, and their efficient translation is dependent on mcm5s2U levels. More generally, proteins involved in translation initiation and elongation are enriched in AAA codons, and reduced in cells lacking mcm5s2U 1213. It is not yet known if the levels of these proteins enriched in AAA codons also require t6A for efficient translation in yeast, but it has been shown in mammals that a decrease in sulfur modified form of t6A (ms2t6A) on tRNALysUUU leads to lower levels of proinsulin 14.

FIGURE 1: Possible cascade of events triggered when s2U, mcm5U or t6A levels are reduced in tRNALysUUU.

Alteration in the levels of mcm5s2U occurring at position 34 of the tRNA (wobble position) and t6A occurring at position 37 (adjacent to the first base of the anti-codon) have global cellular affects. Reduction in either modification alters many regulatory cascades with the text color indicating the modification responsible for the change (red indicates expression change seen in t6A and mcm5s2U mutants). Solid lines represent experimental data; dashed lines indicated potential points of regulation Another phenotype shared by a t6A or a mcm5s2U deficient S. cerevisiae derivatives is the GCN2 independent activation of GCN4 1516. As the activation of the GAAC leads to a major reprograming of transcription (>500 genes are induced and >1000 are repressed) 17, this makes it difficult to interpret whether specific phenotypes observed in these tRNA modification mutants are due to direct or indirect effects. This is made all the more problematic given that another central regulator, the Target of Rapamycin (or TOR), is also affected by both t6A and mcm5s2U. The TOR kinases regulate the balance between protein synthesis and protein degradation in response to nutrient quality and TOR activity is inhibited by low nitrogen conditions, caffeine or rapamycin 18. In yeast, reduced TOR levels increase levels of the Sit4 phosphatase, which dephosphorylates TOR targets such as the regulator Gln3. Unphosporylated Gln3 will then relocate to the nucleus to activate genes required for growth on low quality nitrogen sources. The following links between TOR and mcm5s2U have previously been made: 1) ELP mutants are sensitive to rapamycin and caffeine 16; 2) deletion of SIT4 leads to rapamycin hypersensitivity and resistance to zymocin (a tRNase that recognizes mcm5s2U and cleaves tRNALysUUU leading to cell death) 19 because Sit4 activates the ELP complex by phosphorylation 20. As shown by Scheidt et al. 4, the Elongator mutants mislocate Gln3 leading to rapamycin hypersensitivity, a phenotype that can be suppressed by over-expression of the tRNAs modified by mcm5s2U, suggesting that proper tRNA modification affects Gln3 localization and subsequent activation of the nitrogen catabolite repression (NCR) response. Mislocalization of Gln3 occurs both in elp3∆ (removing the mcm5 moiety) and in urm∆ (s2 moiety). A link between t6A synthesis enzymes and TOR has also recently been seen in flies. The Glavic group showed that lowering levels of one of the subunits of the KEOPS complex (Bud32) reduces TOR phosphorylation of S6K (SCH9 in yeast) required for TOR dependent regulation of ribosome biogenesis 21. How Gcn4 and TOR signaling depend on t6A and mcm5s2U is still far from understood at the molecular level. Are the Gcn4 activation and TOR repression in strains lacking these modifications due to direct effects caused by poor translation of specific proteins or are they part of general stress responses caused by translation inaccuracy and protein misfolding? The reality might lie in a combination of responses as in addition to the targeted effects described above, low mcm5s2U increases levels of proteins involved in proteasomal degradation 12. In addition, s2 synthesis proteins in S. cerevisiae are unstable at high temperature and reduced levels of the modification lead to activation of the heat-shock response regulator (Hsf1) through the synthesis of unfolded proteins (Fig. 1) 22. Finally, silencing both t6A synthesis genes Bud32 and Kae1 in flies activates the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) 23 and mutations of the thiolation enzyme leading to the formation of ms2i6A in mouse led to an increase of the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress response 14. Because the synthesis of the t6A and mcm5s2U modifications of tRNALysUUU draw on primary metabolism intermediates 24, it is tempting to propose that these could serve as sensing signals linking metabolism and translation. One recent example of such an integration is found in the mcm5s2U thiolation pathway; sulfur starvation reduces the levels of the Uba4 thiolation enzyme and hence the levels of mcm5s2U in yeast 13 (Fig. 1). Even if the underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood, low mcm5s2U levels trigger an adaptive response: 1) reduced protein expression due to general slow-down of translation of lysine rich proteins that are found predominantly in the ribosomal machinery; 2) increased levels of methionine, cysteine, and lysine synthesis proteins 13. The complexity of the responses with the interplay of central regulators such as GCN4 and TOR (Fig. 1), make the dissection of the roles of t6A and mcm5s2U a delicate exercise that will require combining of classical genetic and biochemical studies with the genome wide bioinformatics, proteomic and profiling studies that are now available. These studies are all the more critical as derivatives of both modifications have been linked to human diseases as defects in the ms2t6A synthesis enzyme have been linked to type 2 diabetes 14, and familial dysautonomia patients have reduced levels of mcm5s2U 25.
  24 in total

1.  Elevated levels of two tRNA species bypass the requirement for elongator complex in transcription and exocytosis.

Authors:  Anders Esberg; Bo Huang; Marcus J O Johansson; Anders S Byström
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Deficit of tRNA(Lys) modification by Cdkal1 causes the development of type 2 diabetes in mice.

Authors:  Fan-Yan Wei; Takeo Suzuki; Sayaka Watanabe; Satoshi Kimura; Taku Kaitsuka; Atsushi Fujimura; Hideki Matsui; Mohamed Atta; Hiroyuki Michiue; Marc Fontecave; Kazuya Yamagata; Tsutomu Suzuki; Kazuhito Tomizawa
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Sulfur amino acids regulate translational capacity and metabolic homeostasis through modulation of tRNA thiolation.

Authors:  Sunil Laxman; Benjamin M Sutter; Xi Wu; Sujai Kumar; Xiaofeng Guo; David C Trudgian; Hamid Mirzaei; Benjamin P Tu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The yeast elongator histone acetylase requires Sit4-dependent dephosphorylation for toxin-target capacity.

Authors:  Daniel Jablonowski; Lars Fichtner; Michael J R Stark; Raffael Schaffrath
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Sua5p a single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding protein facilitates telomere replication.

Authors:  Fei-Long Meng; Yan Hu; Ning Shen; Xia-Jing Tong; Jianyong Wang; Jianping Ding; Jin-Qiu Zhou
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Distinct subsets of Sit4 holophosphatases are required for inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by rapamycin and zymocin.

Authors:  Daniel Jablonowski; Jens-Eike Täubert; Christian Bär; Michael J R Stark; Raffael Schaffrath
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-09-11

7.  Gcn4 misregulation reveals a direct role for the evolutionary conserved EKC/KEOPS in the t6A modification of tRNAs.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Daugeron; Tineke L Lenstra; Martina Frizzarin; Basma El Yacoubi; Xipeng Liu; Agnès Baudin-Baillieu; Philip Lijnzaad; Laurence Decourty; Cosmin Saveanu; Alain Jacquier; Frank C P Holstege; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Herman van Tilbeurgh; Domenico Libri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Elongator complex influences telomeric gene silencing and DNA damage response by its role in wobble uridine tRNA modification.

Authors:  Changchun Chen; Bo Huang; Mattias Eliasson; Patrik Rydén; Anders S Byström
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  The Drosophila EKC/KEOPS complex: roles in protein synthesis homeostasis and animal growth.

Authors:  Diego Rojas-Benítez; Consuelo Ibar; Álvaro Glavic
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.160

10.  Loss of a conserved tRNA anticodon modification perturbs cellular signaling.

Authors:  Boris Zinshteyn; Wendy V Gilbert
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  10 in total

1.  Can Protein Expression Be Regulated by Modulation of tRNA Modification Profiles?

Authors:  Leticia Pollo-Oliveira; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Elp3 and Dph3 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe mediate cellular stress responses through tRNALysUUU modifications.

Authors:  Desirée Villahermosa; Oliver Fleck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A mutated dph3 gene causes sensitivity of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells to cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Desirée Villahermosa; Karen Knapp; Oliver Fleck
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  KAE1 Allelic Variants Affect TORC1 Activation and Fermentation Kinetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Eduardo I Kessi-Pérez; Francisco Salinas; Asier González; Ying Su; José M Guillamón; Michael N Hall; Luis F Larrondo; Claudio Martínez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  The structural and functional workings of KEOPS.

Authors:  Jonah Beenstock; Frank Sicheri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Nucleoside modifications in the regulation of gene expression: focus on tRNA.

Authors:  Markus Duechler; Grażyna Leszczyńska; Elzbieta Sochacka; Barbara Nawrot
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Anticodon Modifications in the tRNA Set of LUCA and the Fundamental Regularity in the Standard Genetic Code.

Authors:  Peter T S van der Gulik; Wouter D Hoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Loss of Elongator- and KEOPS-Dependent tRNA Modifications Leads to Severe Growth Phenotypes and Protein Aggregation in Yeast.

Authors:  Leticia Pollo-Oliveira; Roland Klassen; Nick Davis; Akif Ciftci; Jo Marie Bacusmo; Maria Martinelli; Michael S DeMott; Thomas J Begley; Peter C Dedon; Raffael Schaffrath; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-18

9.  Global translational impacts of the loss of the tRNA modification t6A in yeast.

Authors:  Patrick C Thiaville; Rachel Legendre; Diego Rojas-Benítez; Agnès Baudin-Baillieu; Isabelle Hatin; Guilhem Chalancon; Alvaro Glavic; Olivier Namy; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2016-01-01

10.  Novel base-pairing interactions at the tRNA wobble position crucial for accurate reading of the genetic code.

Authors:  Alexey Rozov; Natalia Demeshkina; Iskander Khusainov; Eric Westhof; Marat Yusupov; Gulnara Yusupova
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.