Kobra Parvan1, Hadi Hasankhani1, Allehe Seyyedrasooli1, Seyed Mohammad Riahi2, Mahmoud Ghorbani1. 1. Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Student's Committee Research, Faculty of Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Patients with chronic renal disease (CRD) deal with many potential problems with hemodialysis for all their life. Regarding the importance of preventing dialysis adverse effects, which are in close connection with lack of knowledge and report on how to train the patients? This study aims at comparing the impact of two methods of face to face training and training pamphlet on complying and informing of hemodialysis treatments. METHODS: This clinical trial study was conducted on 58 hemodialysis patients who visited Shahid Rahnemun Teaching hospital, Yazd, Iran, and had required conditions of the research. Data were collected through a questionnaire including personal-social information, several questions to assess the level of compliance and to inform the treatment method. The quantitative analysis of this study used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences SPSS version 13 and descriptive (frequency, mean, standard deviation) and inferential (Chi-square, paired t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA) statistics were employed. RESULTS: The mean scores for informing both groups (face to face and training pamphlet) were significantly increased. The mean score for adherence to treatments was also significant. CONCLUSION: In this research, face to face training was found to be more effective than training pamphlet. It seemed to have more strong effect on increasing the level of information and adherence to treatment. To train these people, face to face training should be, thus, preferred.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION:Patients with chronic renal disease (CRD) deal with many potential problems with hemodialysis for all their life. Regarding the importance of preventing dialysis adverse effects, which are in close connection with lack of knowledge and report on how to train the patients? This study aims at comparing the impact of two methods of face to face training and training pamphlet on complying and informing of hemodialysis treatments. METHODS: This clinical trial study was conducted on 58 hemodialysis patients who visited Shahid Rahnemun Teaching hospital, Yazd, Iran, and had required conditions of the research. Data were collected through a questionnaire including personal-social information, several questions to assess the level of compliance and to inform the treatment method. The quantitative analysis of this study used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences SPSS version 13 and descriptive (frequency, mean, standard deviation) and inferential (Chi-square, paired t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA) statistics were employed. RESULTS: The mean scores for informing both groups (face to face and training pamphlet) were significantly increased. The mean score for adherence to treatments was also significant. CONCLUSION: In this research, face to face training was found to be more effective than training pamphlet. It seemed to have more strong effect on increasing the level of information and adherence to treatment. To train these people, face to face training should be, thus, preferred.
Authors: Kana N Miyata; Jenny I Shen; Yasuhide Nishio; Manabu Haneda; Kobena A Dadzie; Nijal R Sheth; Renjiro Kuriyama; Chika Matsuzawa; Ken Tachibana; Nikolas B Harbord; James F Winchester Journal: Clin Exp Nephrol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 2.801
Authors: Victoria Alikari; Maria Tsironi; Vasiliki Matziou; Foteini Tzavella; John Stathoulis; Fotoula Babatsikou; Evangelos Fradelos; Sofia Zyga Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 4.147