| Literature DB >> 25821634 |
Zhisheng Wu1, Min Du2, Xinyuan Shi1, Bing Xu1, Yanjiang Qiao1.
Abstract
This study demonstrated particle size effect on the measurement of saikosaponin A in Bupleurum chinense DC. by near infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopy. Four types of granularity were prepared including powder samples passed through 40-mesh, 65-mesh, 80-mesh, and 100-mesh sieve. Effects of granularity on NIR spectra were investigated, which showed to be wavelength dependent. NIR intensity was proportional to particle size in the first combination-overtone and combination region. Local partial least squares model was constructed separately for every kind of samples, and data-preprocessing techniques were performed to optimize calibration model. The 65-mesh model exhibited the best prediction ability with root mean of square error of prediction (RMSEP) = 0.492 mg·g(-1), correlation coefficient (R P ) = 0.9221, and relative predictive determinant (RPD) = 2.58. Furthermore, a granularity-hybrid calibration model was developed by incorporating granularity variation. Granularity-hybrid model showed better performance than local model. The model performance with 65-mesh samples was still the most accurate with RMSEP = 0.481 mg·g(-1), R P = 0.9279, and RPD = 2.64. All the results presented the guidance for construction of a robust model coupled with granularity-hybrid calibration set.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25821634 PMCID: PMC4363675 DOI: 10.1155/2015/583841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
A summary of tested samples.
| Sample number | Origins | Growth pattern |
|---|---|---|
| 1~5 | Shanxi | Unknown |
| 6~9 | Shanxi | Unknown |
| 10~14 | Shanxi | Cultivated |
| 15~19 | Shanxi | Wild |
| 20~25 | Shanxi | Wild |
| 25~30 | Hebei | Cultivated |
Elution gradient used in the HPLC method.
| Time/min | ACN (v/v) | Water (v/v) |
|---|---|---|
| 0–50 | 25–90 | 75–10 |
| 50–55 | 90 | 10 |
| 55–60 | 25 | 75 |
| 60–67 | 25 | 75 |
Figure 1The chromatograms of Bupleurum chinense DC. extraction solution.
Figure 2(a) Raw spectra of samples with different granularity. (b) Difference of NIR frequency range to the granularity.
Concentration range of SSA in calibration and validation set (mg·g−1).
| Sample set | Numbers | Concentration range | Average | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calibration | 60 | 1.476–8.162 | 3.695 | 1.452 |
| Validation | 30 | 1.601–5.807 | 3.727 | 1.269 |
Figure 3Plot of PRESS value against latent factors.
Local model performance of different granularity.
| Model | LVs | Cross validation | Test-set validation | RPD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSECV |
| RMSEP |
| |||
| 40 | 4 | 0.682 | 0.7671 | 0.650 | 0.8519 | 1.95 |
| 65 | 4 | 0.574 | 0.8347 | 0.492 | 0.9221 | 2.58 |
| 80 | 3 | 0.567 | 0.8408 | 0.534 | 0.9070 | 2.38 |
| 100 | 3 | 0.664 | 0.7484 | 0.522 | 0.9162 | 2.43 |
Figure 4Correlation diagrams between the NIR predicted values and the reference values of SSA content.
Prediction performance of GH model.
| Pretreatment methods | LVs | Cross validation | Test-set validation (40) | Test-set validation (65) | Test-set validation (80) | Test-set validation (100) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSECV |
| RMSEP |
| RMSEP |
| RMSEP |
| RMSEP |
| ||
| RAW | 5 | 0.763 | 0.6903 | 0.814 | 0.7657 | 0.747 | 0.8031 | 0.707 | 0.8292 | 0.635 | 0.8862 |
| MSC | 2 | 0.716 | 0.7278 | 0.716 | 0.8293 | 0.654 | 0.8551 | 0.621 | 0.8628 | 0.538 | 0.9123 |
| 1D + SG | 7 | 0.602 | 0.8229 | 0.687 | 0.8420 | 0.621 | 0.8473 | 0.566 | 0.8909 | 0.566 | 0.8929 |
| 2D + SG | 4 | 0.624 | 0.8025 | 0.671 | 0.8621 | 0.596 | 0.8815 | 0.612 | 0.8651 | 0.540 | 0.9065 |
| MSC + 1D + SG | 6 | 0.606 | 0.8276 | 0.575 | 0.8971 | 0.481 | 0.9279 | 0.524 | 0.9137 | 0.545 | 0.9146 |
| MSC + 2D + SG | 3 | 0.678 | 0.7621 | 0.690 | 0.8538 | 0.664 | 0.8552 | 0.618 | 0.8648 | 0.522 | 0.9126 |
| MSC + 1D + ND | 6 | 0.609 | 0.8821 | 0.672 | 0.8508 | 0.580 | 0.8873 | 0.631 | 0.8655 | 0.765 | 0.8371 |
| MSC + 2D + ND | 6 | 0.566 | 0.8450 | 0.621 | 0.8757 | 0.527 | 0.9099 | 0.583 | 0.8863 | 0.603 | 0.8879 |
Figure 5Correlation diagrams of GH model.