| Literature DB >> 25821524 |
F Alves1, I Nischang1.
Abstract
We prepared new and scalable, hybrid inorganic-organic step-growth hydrogels with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) network knot construction elements and hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) di-ester macromonomers by in situ radical-mediated thiol-ene photopolymerization. The physicochemical properties of the gels are fine-tailored over orders of magnitude including functionalization of their interior, a hierarchical gel structure, and biodegradability.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25821524 PMCID: PMC4360384 DOI: 10.1039/c4py01789g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polym Chem ISSN: 1759-9954 Impact factor: 5.582
Scheme 1Example of the hybrid inorganic–organic nanoscale gel structures prepared on the basis of vinylPOSS ((RSiO3/2) shown for n = 8, 10, and 12) and homotelechelic thiol PEG di-ester macromonomers together with the resulting products upon hydrolytic degradation.
Overview of prepared hybrid hydrogels
| Gel |
| Thiol : vinyl | wt% Dodecanol | % Gel fraction |
|
| 748.24 | 1 : 1 | — | 92.7 (±0.9) |
|
| 1148.24 | 1 : 1 | — | 89.6 (±2.4) |
|
| 2198.24 | 1 : 1 | — | 82.7 (±0.3) |
|
| 6148.24 | 1 : 1 | — | 71.5 (±2.6) |
|
| 1148.24 | 1 : 1.5 | — | 92.5 (±1.2) |
|
| 1148.24 | 1.5 : 1 | — | 75.1 (±2.6) |
|
| 1148.24 | 2 : 1 | — | 57.0 (±1.3) |
|
| 1148.24 | 1 : 1 | 30 | 89.7 (±1.0) |
|
| 1148.24 | 1 : 1 | 50 | 88.1 (±0.9) |
|
| 1148.24 | 1 : 1 | 60 | 88.9 (±0.3) |
M n of the PEG macromonomer calculated on the basis of the M n of the pristine PEG (provided by the manufacturer) plus the molecular weight of two units of thioglycolic acid minus two units of water.
Total wt% of monomers to the solvent DMF was 20 : 80. The polymerization mixtures additionally contained 1 wt% DMPA (with respect to thiol).
Specific portions of DMF were replaced by the co-solvent dodecanol.
Gel fraction was determined as the ratio of the dry weight of the gel divided by the overall weight of monomers used for preparation. Values in brackets represent standard deviation from three independent gel fraction determinations.
Fig. 1(a) Photographs of the water-containing hydrogels prepared according to Table 1. All materials were prepared by molding within 4 mL glass vials. Thus, the volume variations observed are due to inherently different water uptakes of the gels. (b) Cryo-SEM of Gels 2 and 10.
Fig. 2(a) Deionized water swelling ratios at T = 5 °C (red bars), T = 25 °C (blue bars), and T = 37 °C (green bars) for hydrogels prepared according to Table 1 at increased PEG macromonomer chain lengths (Gels 1–4), increased thiol : vinyl molar ratios (Gels 2, and 5–7), and increased wt% of the co-solvent dodecanol used for gel preparation (Gel 2, and Gels 8–10). (b) Time taken to complete degradation of the hydrogels prepared according to Table 1 and shown in the left row immersed in 15 mL 0.1 M PBS at pH = 7.4 and T = 37 °C to mimic physiological conditions.
Fig. 3Compressive stress–strain curves obtained through uniaxial compression of selected gels prepared according to Table 1. The inset shows an enlarged view of the initial slopes observed in the grey-shaded area. A detailed summary of mechanical data extracted from such curves is reported in Table S2 in the ESI.†