Literature DB >> 25821261

Primordial argon isotope fractionation in the atmosphere of Mars measured by the SAM instrument on Curiosity and implications for atmospheric loss.

Sushil K Atreya1, Melissa G Trainer2, Heather B Franz2, Michael H Wong1, Heidi L K Manning3, Charles A Malespin2, Paul R Mahaffy2, Pamela G Conrad2, Anna E Brunner2, Laurie A Leshin4, John H Jones5, Christopher R Webster6, Tobias C Owen7, Robert O Pepin8, R Navarro-González9.   

Abstract

[1] The quadrupole mass spectrometer of the Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) instrument on Curiosity rover has made the first high-precision measurement of the nonradiogenic argon isotope ratio in the atmosphere of Mars. The resulting value of 36Ar/38Ar = 4.2 ± 0.1 is highly significant for it provides excellent evidence that "Mars" meteorites are indeed of Martian origin, and it points to a significant loss of argon of at least 50% and perhaps as high as 85-95% from the atmosphere of Mars in the past 4 billion years. Taken together with the isotopic fractionations in N, C, H, and O measured by SAM, these results imply a substantial loss of atmosphere from Mars in the posthydrodynamic escape phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mars; argon isotopes; atmospheric loss; habitability; planetary atmospheres; solar system

Year:  2013        PMID: 25821261      PMCID: PMC4373143          DOI: 10.1002/2013GL057763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geophys Res Lett        ISSN: 0094-8276            Impact factor:   4.720


1. Introduction

[2] A relatively high-precision direct measurement of the 36Ar/38Ar ratio in the Martian atmosphere has previously been postulated to be the most compelling datum to definitively tie the so-called “Martian meteorites” (shergottites, nakhlites, and chassignites, i.e., SNC) to Mars [e.g., ]. This is because previous estimates of the (supposed) Martian atmospheric 36Ar/38Ar values derived from trapped gases in these unique meteorites suggested a value near 4 [e.g., ; ], highly distinct from the relatively uniform 36Ar/38Ar values of 5.3–5.5 found in a wide variety of other solar system objects ranging from the Sun to Jupiter to Earth (see Table 1). The earliest analyses of shock glasses from shergottite EET79001 noted the presence of Ar trapped on ejection, with a 36Ar/38Ar value considerably less than the terrestrial value of 5.3. ] deduced a Martian “atmospheric” ratio of 4.1 ± 0.2 from EETA79001. ] derived a value of 3.60 ± 0.44. ] considered all shergottite data available up to that time and gave a range of 3.5–4.6 for 36Ar/38Ar in the meteorites and concluded that the Martian atmospheric ratio of 36Ar/38Ar in these meteorites is less than 3.9. However, deriving a precise value for Martian atmospheric 36Ar/38Ar from Martian meteorites is made difficult because of the presence of significant amounts of Ar produced by galactic cosmic ray reactions during transit from Mars to Earth. The most accurate determinations derive from the EET79001 impact glass, as EET79001 has a relatively low-exposure age of 0.6 Myr [].
Table 1

Argon Isotope Ratio (36Ar/38Ar) in the Atmosphere of Mars Compared to the Mars Meteorites, Sun, Jupiter, and Earth

Object36Ar/38Ar Ratio
Mars atmosphere (MSL/SAM 2013)a4.2 ± 0.1
Mars atmosphere (Viking/GCMS 1976)bc4–7
Mars meteoritesd3.5–4.6
Sunef5.5 ± 0.01
Jupiterg5.6 ± 0.25
Earthh5.305 ± 0.008

This paper.

].

].

].

].

].

].

].

Argon Isotope Ratio (36Ar/38Ar) in the Atmosphere of Mars Compared to the Mars Meteorites, Sun, Jupiter, and Earth This paper. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. [3] Previous attempts to measure the argon isotopes in the atmosphere of Mars have met with limited success. Although radiogenic argon (40Ar) and the primordial argon isotopes (36Ar and 38Ar) were measured by the mass spectrometer on the Viking Lander [; ], an accurate determination of the 36Ar/38Ar ratio could not be achieved because of large background levels in the mass 38 region and instrumental effects, and hence, only a range of 4–7 for the 36Ar/38Ar ratio was reported []. [4] The quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) of the Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) instrument on Curiosity rover has carried out several direct atmospheric composition measurements on Mars including argon []. Although all argon isotopes were detected, the direct ingestion of Mars air could not yield a precise value for 36Ar/38Ar ratio due to insufficient signal to background ratio (or S/BG, defined as the total signal level divided by the background level) at m/z 36. Enrichment experiments were therefore conducted to enhance the signal both at m/z 36 and 38. The result is the first high-precision data on the value of 36Ar/38Ar ratio in the Martian atmosphere. These data provide definite proof that the “Martian” rocks came from Mars (section 4). Additionally, considering that argon must have been completely or nearly completely removed from the atmosphere of Mars during hydrogen-led hydrodynamic escape and early intense sputtering loss, the argon isotopes in the present atmosphere provide arguably the most stringent constraints on posthydrodynamic loss, especially since argon is chemically inert and it does not interact or exchange with the Martian surface or interior. The argon isotope fractionation is thus a key piece of the Mars habitability puzzle, which the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Mission is designed to address []. This paper describes the argon isotope enrichment experiments (section 2) and their results (section 3) and significance in the context of Martian meteorites and atmospheric loss (section 4).

2. Measurement Technique—The Enrichment Experiments

[5] For optimal precision in measurements of noble gas abundances and isotope ratios, these species must be concentrated in the atmospheric sample through removal of active gases with components of SAM's gas-processing system []. Three modes of the enrichment experiment have been devised to achieve this goal: dynamic mode, semistatic mode, and static mode. Results presented in this manuscript were obtained with dynamic and semistatic mode experiments, summarized below (the reader is referred to ] for a detailed description of the enrichment experiment modes). For the dynamic mode enrichment experiment, the atmospheric sample in the SAM manifold is exposed to chemical scrubbers to remove H2O, CO2, and other chemically active gases while the QMS is continuously pumped by the wide range turbomolecular pump (WRP1). The process of ingestion of an atmospheric sample, followed by scrubbing, is repeated multiple times, gradually enriching the sample in noble gases. This results in increased density of the noble gases needed to achieve high signal-to-noise (S/N) and S/BG for the low-abundance isotopologues. Semistatic mode experiments follow the same procedure as described for dynamic mode but allow greater source pressures of noble gases by adding passive pumping by the getter in the QMS and only partially opening the high-conductance valve to the turbomolecular pump (WRP1). The higher pressure of noble gases inside the instrument thus gives enhanced signal over the dynamic enrichment mode. The first atmospheric enrichment experiment that was performed by SAM on Mars was a dynamic mode version of the noble gas enrichment experiment on sol 231 (Figure 1). A second, semistatic enrichment experiment was run on sol 341 (Figure 2). The 36Ar/38Ar ratio is stable across successive enrichment cycles at all m/z 36 count rates higher than ∼104 counts/s (lower panel of each figure), so there is no instrumental fractionation effect due to the enrichment process. Preflight and test bed experiments show that the SAM-QMS accurately reproduces the 36Ar/38Ar ratio in calibration gas samples.
Fig 1

Results from the dynamic enrichment of argon 36 and 38 on Mars by the SAM instrument on MSL on sol 231. (a) The successive ingestion of samples and enrichment cycles of the Mars atmosphere increases the counts per second (cps) and S/N of the argon isotopologues (symbols, top left axis), while the major ion m/z 44 of atmospheric CO2 is scrubbed down to background levels (black trace, top right axis) via adsorption onto the SAM scrubbers. During a normal atmospheric ingestion, the m/z 44 peak would saturate the detector. The data shown for m/z 36 and 38 have been corrected for background signal as described in the text. Enrichment cycles 1a and 1b reference measurements of the same samples of atmosphere as transferred into the QMS through two different valves. Cycle 1a used a low-conductance valve; cycles 1b through 10 used the same higher-conductance valve. Cycle 1b is thus is the first true sample in this series. (b) The average ratio for each enrichment cycle is given as a function of argon 36 counts, with error bars representing the uncertainties introduced by scatter in the data and the multiple background subtraction methods used. All data from the final six enrichment cycles, where the 38Ar S/N > 3, are averaged to determine a 36Ar/38Ar ratio of 4.26 ± 0.08 for the dynamic enrichment run. Sol 0 is referenced to Curiosity's landing at Gale Crater (4.5895°S, 137.4417°E) on Mars at 15:03 local mean solar time or 05:17 UTC on 6 August 2012, in Mars Year 31.

Fig 2

Same as Figure 1 but for the semistatic enrichment experiment on sol 341. All data from the final six enrichment cycles, where the 38Ar S/BG > 5, are averaged to determine a 36Ar/38Ar ratio of 4.16 ± 0.14 for the semistatic enrichment run. The uncertainty estimate includes statistical noise and the background correction.

Results from the dynamic enrichment of argon 36 and 38 on Mars by the SAM instrument on MSL on sol 231. (a) The successive ingestion of samples and enrichment cycles of the Mars atmosphere increases the counts per second (cps) and S/N of the argon isotopologues (symbols, top left axis), while the major ion m/z 44 of atmospheric CO2 is scrubbed down to background levels (black trace, top right axis) via adsorption onto the SAM scrubbers. During a normal atmospheric ingestion, the m/z 44 peak would saturate the detector. The data shown for m/z 36 and 38 have been corrected for background signal as described in the text. Enrichment cycles 1a and 1b reference measurements of the same samples of atmosphere as transferred into the QMS through two different valves. Cycle 1a used a low-conductance valve; cycles 1b through 10 used the same higher-conductance valve. Cycle 1b is thus is the first true sample in this series. (b) The average ratio for each enrichment cycle is given as a function of argon 36 counts, with error bars representing the uncertainties introduced by scatter in the data and the multiple background subtraction methods used. All data from the final six enrichment cycles, where the 38Ar S/N > 3, are averaged to determine a 36Ar/38Ar ratio of 4.26 ± 0.08 for the dynamic enrichment run. Sol 0 is referenced to Curiosity's landing at Gale Crater (4.5895°S, 137.4417°E) on Mars at 15:03 local mean solar time or 05:17 UTC on 6 August 2012, in Mars Year 31. Same as Figure 1 but for the semistatic enrichment experiment on sol 341. All data from the final six enrichment cycles, where the 38Ar S/BG > 5, are averaged to determine a 36Ar/38Ar ratio of 4.16 ± 0.14 for the semistatic enrichment run. The uncertainty estimate includes statistical noise and the background correction.

3. Data Analysis and Results

[6] As discussed in ], the removal of the contribution of the QMS and manifold background signal to the mass channels of interest must be carefully done for each experiment. In both enrichment experiments, background scans of the evacuated instrument and manifold were performed prior to the first atmospheric sample ingestion. However, unlike direct atmospheric measurements, these background scans spanned a small time window relative to the length of the enrichment experiment, making it difficult to characterize evolution of the background signal using the background scans alone. To model background evolution for the argon isotopes of interest (m/z 36 and 38), we used m/z 39 as a tracer mass to measure the exponential decay of background signals due to loss through continuous operation of WRP1 and the getters (m/z 39 contains actual signal from fragments of trace hydrocarbon species produced in the SAM system). The data at m/z 39 were normalized to match the signal levels of m/z 36 and 38 in these background scan intervals, and the normalized background signals were subtracted from the enriched sample data to derive the background-corrected signals. We estimate uncertainties in the 36Ar/38Ar ratio due to background corrections are 1.7% for sol 231 and 3.4% for sol 341, based on the difference in behavior of separate tracers at m/z 19 and 39. [7] The ratio of 36Ar/38Ar was calculated at each time point, then averaged and binned per enrichment cycle as shown in Figure 1b for the dynamic experiment and Figure 2b for the semistatic experiment. In both cases, the ratio converges to a stable value of just over 4 as S/BG increases in later enrichment cycles. The two experiments give consistent measurements of the 36Ar/38Ar ratio: 4.26 ± 0.08 for sol 231 and 4.16 ± 0.14 for sol 341. The uncertainty in the reported 36Ar/38Ar ratio is the standard error of the mean of the ratio determined from each mass scan, combined with the uncertainty introduced through the background correction. [8] Within the range of uncertainty, the 36Ar/38Ar ratios determined by the dynamic and semistatic enrichment experiments are in excellent agreement. We report a value of 4.2 ± 0.1 for the final 36Ar/38Ar ratio in the atmosphere of Mars, based on data from the two enrichment experiments.

4. Rocks from Mars and Loss of Atmosphere to Space

[9] The 36Ar/38Ar value of 4.2 ± 0.1 measured by the SAM-QMS is in excellent agreement with those inferred for the Mars atmosphere through analysis of the SNC meteorites and thus provides extremely strong evidence that these meteorites are in fact samples of the red planet. The atmospheric 36Ar/38Ar derived from EETA79001 [] is indeed nearly identical to that determined by SAM in situ from the surface of Mars. [10] The argon isotope ratio is also an exceptionally good indicator of atmospheric loss to space. Planetesimals forming the terrestrial and the giant planets carried primordial argon with the 36Ar/38Ar value of 5.5 we find in the Sun (Table 1 and Figure 3). Because of its great mass, Jupiter retained all of its original volatiles over geologic time; thus, its 36Ar/38Ar remained unaltered and the Galileo probe indeed found it to be the same as in the Sun within the range of uncertainty. In contrast, fractionation has taken place on Mars (Table 1 and Figure 3) due to escape to space as a consequence of lower gravity and other effects such as solar wind interaction with the upper atmosphere [; ]. The distinctively low 36Ar/38Ar value on Mars compared with other solar system objects reflects preferential loss of the lighter isotope of argon over time from the Martian atmosphere. In this way, this isotope ratio is similar to D/H, 14N/15N, 12C/13C, and 16O/18O (Table 2), all of which show significant enrichment of the heavier isotope due to atmospheric loss [e.g., ; ; ; ; ]. Taken together, the isotopic ratios of the different species allow a detailed picture of the history of the atmosphere to be constructed, including insights into the fraction of volatiles that have been lost from Mars over time. However, each isotope system has a complex and unique associated set of reservoirs (e.g., atmosphere, crust, planetary interior), geochemical processes (e.g., volcanic degassing, water-rock interaction), and loss mechanisms that contribute to its history, making this a difficult exercise in evolutionary modeling.
Fig 3

Comparison of the 36Ar/38Ar ratio measured in the atmosphere of Mars by Curiosity's SAM-QMS in 2013 with the Viking GCMS result in 1976, Mars meteorites, Earth, Jupiter and the Sun. See Table 1 for the values and references.

Table 2

Isotope Fractionations in the Atmosphere of Mars Measured by the QMS and TLS Instruments of the SAM Suite on MSL

IsotopesMars ValueSAM Instrument
36Ar/38Ara4.2 ± 0.1QMS
40Ar/36Arb1.9 (±0.3) ×103QMS
14N/15Nc173 ±9QMS
δDd4950 ±1080TLS
δ13CVPDB45 ±12‰QMS
δ13CVPDB46 ±4‰TLS
δ18OSMOW48 ±5‰TLS

This paper.

].

].

].

δ13C measured by the SAM Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) and QMS in CO2 is relative to Vienna Peedee belemnite standard, where 13C/12C = 1.1237 × 10−2.

δ18O is relative to Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW) standard, where 18O/16O = 2.0052 × 10−3, and D/H is from H2O (D/HSMOW =1.5575 × 10−4).

Comparison of the 36Ar/38Ar ratio measured in the atmosphere of Mars by Curiosity's SAM-QMS in 2013 with the Viking GCMS result in 1976, Mars meteorites, Earth, Jupiter and the Sun. See Table 1 for the values and references. Isotope Fractionations in the Atmosphere of Mars Measured by the QMS and TLS Instruments of the SAM Suite on MSL This paper. ]. ]. ]. δ13C measured by the SAM Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) and QMS in CO2 is relative to Vienna Peedee belemnite standard, where 13C/12C = 1.1237 × 10−2. δ18O is relative to Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW) standard, where 18O/16O = 2.0052 × 10−3, and D/H is from H2O (D/HSMOW =1.5575 × 10−4). [11] Because argon is a noble gas, in principle, it should be among the simpler systems to decipher. Despite Mars' relatively low-escape velocity, thermal escape from the exobase is negligible for argon due to its relatively large mass. On the other hand, because of the lack of global magnetic field and only a weak ionosphere induced field, solar wind interacts strongly with the upper atmosphere/ionosphere of Mars. As a consequence, solar wind-induced sputtering is a likely mechanism for loss leading to heavy isotope enrichment [; ]. According to this mechanism, atmospheric ions such as O+ are picked up by the solar wind and accelerated antisunward as they move down the magnetotail. A fraction of these energetic ions or neutrals produced by their charge transfer impacts the exobase, thus providing sufficient energy of ∼1 keV to atmospheric species such as argon to escape by sputtering. As diffusive separation above the homopause results in the lighter isotope to be distributed to higher elevations than the heavier isotope, 36Ar is lost preferentially to space from the exobase, leading to an enrichment of the heavier isotope in the atmosphere. Modeling of early atmospheric processing prior to ∼4 Ga [e.g., ] suggests that it was probably dominated by a combination of hydrodynamic escape, intense sputtering loss, and large-scale impact erosion which would have depleted atmospheric Ar to levels well below its current abundance. The current 36Ar/38Ar value of 4.2 ± 0.1 must then have been set by largely the balancing of atmospheric loss through solar wind erosion with the outgassing of mantle Ar with a solar 36Ar/38Ar ratio of 5.5 (e.g., trapped interior component of Chassigny with 36Ar/38Ar ≥5.26) [] since about 4 Ga. The specific history of the atmospheric 36Ar/38Ar value depends on the details of the rates of outgassing from volcanoes, additions or loss from impacts, and atmospheric erosion with time. Previous models [; ; ; ] indicate that loss of at least 50% of the original atmospheric argon is required and probably as much as 85–95% if other sources of chondritic 36Ar/38Ar contribute (e.g., late chondritic impacts or later-than-anticipated outgassing) to achieve the 36Ar/38Ar value determined by SAM and reported in this paper. [12] The low 36Ar/38Ar ratio measured by SAM at Mars is not likely the result of spallogenic nuclear processes, which would require very low chlorine concentrations of <0.1wt.% in upper layers of rocks. Although the mean chlorine content of all surface rocks on Mars is unknown, chlorine has been found to be ubiquitous in every soil ever analyzed in situ (e.g., ] from Viking Landers) or from Mars orbit (] from Mars Odyssey). Moreover, Cl concentrations are found to be relatively large, in the 0.3–1.2 wt.% range. If these large Cl abundances are representative also of global values in top layers of rocks, then, depending on the rate of diffusion of (spallogenically generated) argon out of rocks up to the exobase, the 36Ar/38Ar ratio in the Martian atmosphere would be larger, not smaller, than the solar value of 5.5, contrary to the value reported in this paper (4.2). This would imply even greater loss of argon from the atmosphere than discussed above.

5. Summary

[13] The 36Ar/38Ar ratio of 4.2 ± 0.1 determined by the SAM-QMS in the Martian atmosphere is the lowest 36Ar/38Ar yet measured on any object in the solar system, except certain SNCs. This measurement implies loss of atmosphere to space in the past 4 billion years. It also provides a definitive proof that SNCs came from Mars. The argon measurements provide one key element of the suite of measurements that can help unravel the history of loss of the Martian atmosphere. SAM atmospheric measurements are underway to (i) refine the precision of the measurement of the abundance and fractionation in the heavy noble gases, Kr and Xe, and (ii) compare the atmospheric isotope composition of C, O, and H in carbon dioxide and water with those in gases evolved from solid samples [] that may retain the isotopic signatures from the distant past. The surface-atmospheric measurements also provide ground truth for future upper atmospheric measurements such as those anticipated from the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) mission where the spacecraft will only venture occasionally low enough to sample the well-mixed atmosphere. The combination of measurements of the current atmospheric isotopic composition and current atmospheric loss rates provided by data from instruments on Curiosity and MAVEN, respectively, may lead to improved models of conditions on Mars in the distant past that might have been more suitable habitats for microbial life.
  5 in total

1.  Composition of the atmosphere at the surface of Mars: detection of argon-36 and preliminary analysis.

Authors:  T Owen; K Biemann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The Atmosphere of Mars near the Surface: Isotope Ratios and Upper Limits on Noble Gases.

Authors:  K Biemann; T Owen; D R Rushneck; A L Lafleur; D W Howarth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Abundance and isotopic composition of gases in the martian atmosphere from the Curiosity rover.

Authors:  Paul R Mahaffy; Christopher R Webster; Sushil K Atreya; Heather Franz; Michael Wong; Pamela G Conrad; Dan Harpold; John J Jones; Laurie A Leshin; Heidi Manning; Tobias Owen; Robert O Pepin; Steven Squyres; Melissa Trainer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Volatile, isotope, and organic analysis of martian fines with the Mars Curiosity rover.

Authors:  L A Leshin; P R Mahaffy; C R Webster; M Cabane; P Coll; P G Conrad; P D Archer; S K Atreya; A E Brunner; A Buch; J L Eigenbrode; G J Flesch; H B Franz; C Freissinet; D P Glavin; A C McAdam; K E Miller; D W Ming; R V Morris; R Navarro-González; P B Niles; T Owen; R O Pepin; S Squyres; A Steele; J C Stern; R E Summons; D Y Sumner; B Sutter; C Szopa; S Teinturier; M G Trainer; J J Wray; J P Grotzinger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Isotope ratios of H, C, and O in CO2 and H2O of the martian atmosphere.

Authors:  Chris R Webster; Paul R Mahaffy; Gregory J Flesch; Paul B Niles; John H Jones; Laurie A Leshin; Sushil K Atreya; Jennifer C Stern; Lance E Christensen; Tobias Owen; Heather Franz; Robert O Pepin; Andrew Steele; Cherie Achilles; Christophe Agard; José Alexandre Alves Verdasca; Robert Anderson; Ryan Anderson; Doug Archer; Carlos Armiens-Aparicio; Ray Arvidson; Evgeny Atlaskin; Andrew Aubrey; Burt Baker; Michael Baker; Tonci Balic-Zunic; David Baratoux; Julien Baroukh; Bruce Barraclough; Keri Bean; Luther Beegle; Alberto Behar; James Bell; Steve Bender; Mehdi Benna; Jennifer Bentz; Gilles Berger; Jeff Berger; Daniel Berman; David Bish; David F Blake; Juan J Blanco Avalos; Diana Blaney; Jen Blank; Hannah Blau; Lora Bleacher; Eckart Boehm; Oliver Botta; Stephan Böttcher; Thomas Boucher; Hannah Bower; Nick Boyd; Bill Boynton; Elly Breves; John Bridges; Nathan Bridges; William Brinckerhoff; David Brinza; Thomas Bristow; Claude Brunet; Anna Brunner; Will Brunner; Arnaud Buch; Mark Bullock; Sönke Burmeister; Michel Cabane; Fred Calef; James Cameron; John Campbell; Bruce Cantor; Michael Caplinger; Javier Caride Rodríguez; Marco Carmosino; Isaías Carrasco Blázquez; Antoine Charpentier; Steve Chipera; David Choi; Benton Clark; Sam Clegg; Timothy Cleghorn; Ed Cloutis; George Cody; Patrice Coll; Pamela Conrad; David Coscia; Agnès Cousin; David Cremers; Joy Crisp; Alain Cros; Frank Cucinotta; Claude d'Uston; Scott Davis; Mackenzie Day; Manuel de la Torre Juarez; Lauren DeFlores; Dorothea DeLapp; Julia DeMarines; David DesMarais; William Dietrich; Robert Dingler; Christophe Donny; Bob Downs; Darrell Drake; Gilles Dromart; Audrey Dupont; Brian Duston; Jason Dworkin; M Darby Dyar; Lauren Edgar; Kenneth Edgett; Christopher Edwards; Laurence Edwards; Bethany Ehlmann; Bent Ehresmann; Jen Eigenbrode; Beverley Elliott; Harvey Elliott; Ryan Ewing; Cécile Fabre; Alberto Fairén; Ken Farley; Jack Farmer; Caleb Fassett; Laurent Favot; Donald Fay; Fedor Fedosov; Jason Feldman; Sabrina Feldman; Marty Fisk; Mike Fitzgibbon; Melissa Floyd; Lorenzo Flückiger; Olivier Forni; Abby Fraeman; Raymond Francis; Pascaline François; Caroline Freissinet; Katherine Louise French; Jens Frydenvang; Alain Gaboriaud; Marc Gailhanou; James Garvin; Olivier Gasnault; Claude Geffroy; Ralf Gellert; Maria Genzer; Daniel Glavin; Austin Godber; Fred Goesmann; Walter Goetz; Dmitry Golovin; Felipe Gómez Gómez; Javier Gómez-Elvira; Brigitte Gondet; Suzanne Gordon; Stephen Gorevan; John Grant; Jennifer Griffes; David Grinspoon; John Grotzinger; Philippe Guillemot; Jingnan Guo; Sanjeev Gupta; Scott Guzewich; Robert Haberle; Douglas Halleaux; Bernard Hallet; Vicky Hamilton; Craig Hardgrove; David Harker; Daniel Harpold; Ari-Matti Harri; Karl Harshman; Donald Hassler; Harri Haukka; Alex Hayes; Ken Herkenhoff; Paul Herrera; Sebastian Hettrich; Ezat Heydari; Victoria Hipkin; Tori Hoehler; Jeff Hollingsworth; Judy Hudgins; Wesley Huntress; Joel Hurowitz; Stubbe Hviid; Karl Iagnemma; Steve Indyk; Guy Israël; Ryan Jackson; Samantha Jacob; Bruce Jakosky; Elsa Jensen; Jaqueline Kløvgaard Jensen; Jeffrey Johnson; Micah Johnson; Steve Johnstone; Andrea Jones; Jonathan Joseph; Insoo Jun; Linda Kah; Henrik Kahanpää; Melinda Kahre; Natalya Karpushkina; Wayne Kasprzak; Janne Kauhanen; Leslie Keely; Osku Kemppinen; Didier Keymeulen; Myung-Hee Kim; Kjartan Kinch; Penny King; Laurel Kirkland; Gary Kocurek; Asmus Koefoed; Jan Köhler; Onno Kortmann; Alexander Kozyrev; Jill Krezoski; Daniel Krysak; Ruslan Kuzmin; Jean Luc Lacour; Vivian Lafaille; Yves Langevin; Nina Lanza; Jeremie Lasue; Stéphane Le Mouélic; Ella Mae Lee; Qiu-Mei Lee; David Lees; Matthew Lefavor; Mark Lemmon; Alain Lepinette Malvitte; Richard Léveillé; Éric Lewin-Carpintier; Kevin Lewis; Shuai Li; Leslie Lipkaman; Cynthia Little; Maxim Litvak; Eric Lorigny; Guenter Lugmair; Angela Lundberg; Eric Lyness; Morten Madsen; Justin Maki; Alexey Malakhov; Charles Malespin; Michael Malin; Nicolas Mangold; Gérard Manhes; Heidi Manning; Geneviève Marchand; Mercedes Marín Jiménez; César Martín García; Dave Martin; Mildred Martin; Jesús Martínez-Frías; Javier Martín-Soler; F Javier Martín-Torres; Patrick Mauchien; Sylvestre Maurice; Amy McAdam; Elaina McCartney; Timothy McConnochie; Emily McCullough; Ian McEwan; Christopher McKay; Scott McLennan; Sean McNair; Noureddine Melikechi; Pierre-Yves Meslin; Michael Meyer; Alissa Mezzacappa; Hayden Miller; Kristen Miller; Ralph Milliken; Douglas Ming; Michelle Minitti; Michael Mischna; Igor Mitrofanov; Jeff Moersch; Maxim Mokrousov; Antonio Molina Jurado; John Moores; Luis Mora-Sotomayor; John Michael Morookian; Richard Morris; Shaunna Morrison; Reinhold Mueller-Mellin; Jan-Peter Muller; Guillermo Muñoz Caro; Marion Nachon; Sara Navarro López; Rafael Navarro-González; Kenneth Nealson; Ara Nefian; Tony Nelson; Megan Newcombe; Claire Newman; Horton Newsom; Sergey Nikiforov; Brian Nixon; Eldar Noe Dobrea; Thomas Nolan; Dorothy Oehler; Ann Ollila; Timothy Olson; Miguel Ángel de Pablo Hernández; Alexis Paillet; Etienne Pallier; Marisa Palucis; Timothy Parker; Yann Parot; Kiran Patel; Mark Paton; Gale Paulsen; Alex Pavlov; Betina Pavri; Verónica Peinado-González; Laurent Peret; Rene Perez; Glynis Perrett; Joe Peterson; Cedric Pilorget; Patrick Pinet; Jorge Pla-García; Ianik Plante; Franck Poitrasson; Jouni Polkko; Radu Popa; Liliya Posiolova; Arik Posner; Irina Pradler; Benito Prats; Vasily Prokhorov; Sharon Wilson Purdy; Eric Raaen; Leon Radziemski; Scot Rafkin; Miguel Ramos; Elizabeth Rampe; François Raulin; Michael Ravine; Günther Reitz; Nilton Rennó; Melissa Rice; Mark Richardson; François Robert; Kevin Robertson; José Antonio Rodriguez Manfredi; Julio J Romeral-Planelló; Scott Rowland; David Rubin; Muriel Saccoccio; Andrew Salamon; Jennifer Sandoval; Anton Sanin; Sara Alejandra Sans Fuentes; Lee Saper; Philippe Sarrazin; Violaine Sautter; Hannu Savijärvi; Juergen Schieber; Mariek Schmidt; Walter Schmidt; Daniel Scholes; Marcel Schoppers; Susanne Schröder; Susanne Schwenzer; Eduardo Sebastian Martinez; Aaron Sengstacken; Ruslan Shterts; Kirsten Siebach; Tero Siili; Jeff Simmonds; Jean-Baptiste Sirven; Susie Slavney; Ronald Sletten; Michael Smith; Pablo Sobrón Sánchez; Nicole Spanovich; John Spray; Steven Squyres; Katie Stack; Fabien Stalport; Thomas Stein; Noel Stewart; Susan Louise Svane Stipp; Kevin Stoiber; Ed Stolper; Bob Sucharski; Rob Sullivan; Roger Summons; Dawn Sumner; Vivian Sun; Kimberley Supulver; Brad Sutter; Cyril Szopa; Florence Tan; Christopher Tate; Samuel Teinturier; Inge ten Kate; Peter Thomas; Lucy Thompson; Robert Tokar; Mike Toplis; Josefina Torres Redondo; Melissa Trainer; Allan Treiman; Vladislav Tretyakov; Roser Urqui-O'Callaghan; Jason Van Beek; Tessa Van Beek; Scott VanBommel; David Vaniman; Alexey Varenikov; Ashwin Vasavada; Paulo Vasconcelos; Edward Vicenzi; Andrey Vostrukhin; Mary Voytek; Meenakshi Wadhwa; Jennifer Ward; Eddie Weigle; Danika Wellington; Frances Westall; Roger Craig Wiens; Mary Beth Wilhelm; Amy Williams; Joshua Williams; Rebecca Williams; Richard B Williams; Mike Wilson; Robert Wimmer-Schweingruber; Mike Wolff; Mike Wong; James Wray; Megan Wu; Charles Yana; Albert Yen; Aileen Yingst; Cary Zeitlin; Robert Zimdar; María-Paz Zorzano Mier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mission Overview and Scientific Contributions from the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity Rover After Eight Years of Surface Operations.

Authors:  Ashwin R Vasavada
Journal:  Space Sci Rev       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 8.943

2.  Isotope Mass Spectrometry in the Solar System Exploration.

Authors:  Shoichiro Yokota
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2018-09-28

3.  Recovery of Fatty Acids from Mineralogic Mars Analogs by TMAH Thermochemolysis for the Sample Analysis at Mars Wet Chemistry Experiment on the Curiosity Rover.

Authors:  Amy J Williams; Jennifer Eigenbrode; Melissa Floyd; Mary Beth Wilhelm; Shane O'Reilly; Sarah Stewart Johnson; Kathleen L Craft; Christine A Knudson; Slavka Andrejkovičová; James M T Lewis; Arnaud Buch; Daniel P Glavin; Caroline Freissinet; Ross H Williams; Cyril Szopa; Maëva Millan; Roger E Summons; Amy McAdam; Kathleen Benison; Rafael Navarro-González; Charles Malespin; Paul R Mahaffy
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Phobos LIFE (Living Interplanetary Flight Experiment).

Authors:  Bruce H Betts; David Warmflash; Raymond E Fraze; Louis Friedman; Elena Vorobyova; Timothy G Lilburn; Amy Smith; Petra Rettberg; K Ingemar Jönsson; Neva Ciftcioglu; George E Fox; Tomas Svitek; Joseph L Kirschvinck; Ralf Moeller; Marko Wassmann; Thomas Berger
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  In Situ Geochronology on Mars and the Development of Future Instrumentation.

Authors:  Barbara A Cohen; Charles A Malespin; Kenneth A Farley; Peter E Martin; Yuichiro Cho; Paul R Mahaffy
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Groundwater production from geothermal heating on early Mars and implication for early martian habitability.

Authors:  Lujendra Ojha; Jacob Buffo; Suniti Karunatillake; Matthew Siegler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 14.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.