Piezoelectrics are key functional materials in actuator and sensor applications.1 Current technology exploits lead-based materials displaying a morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) between two ferroelectric solid solutions of different symmetries and polarization directions. This is best exemplified by the PbZr1−TiO3 (PZT) perovskite system where the distortions driving the piezo response are produced by the stereo-active electron lone pair of the Pb2+ cation on the A site of the ABO3perovskite structure.2 Due to the environmental impact of lead, there is a considerable focus on the synthesis of lead-free electroceramics. It is not however clear if the complex crystal chemistry underlying the structural phase boundaries at the MPB in lead-based systems can be simply translated into lead-free analogues. In particular the balance between distortions driven by the A and B site cations and the role of octahedral tilting and tolerance factor considerations are expected to be quite different in non-lead systems, as Pb2+ is significantly larger than the more highly charged Bi3+ often considered as an alternative polarization-generating cation.3 However, the smaller size of bismuth ions generally requires high-pressure synthesis conditions to form a perovskite. Only a small group of known perovskites exist with A-site bismuth cations that are stable at ambient pressure, based on BiFeO3,4 Bi2Mn4/3Ni2/3O6,5 and Bi(Fe2/8Ti3/8Mg3/8)O3 (BFTM).6 Bi2Mn4/3Ni2/3O6 is antiferrodisplacive,5 while both BiFeO3 and BFTM adopt the R′ R3c structure where the [111]p displacements of untilted R (space group R3m in the PZT case) are coupled with octahedral rotation about the same axis (the prime symbol denotes the presence of tilts). In order to access MPBs, polar structures with distinct polarization directions away from [111]p in these Bi-based families are required.We investigated the pseudoternary phase field BFTM–LaFeO3 (LFO)–La2MgTiO6 (LMT) where the introduction of LFO (tolerance factor t=0.95) would alter the average structural asymmetry on the A site by combining the aspherical Bi3+ and spherical La3+ cations, and the addition of Mg2+ and Ti4+ from LMT (t=0.95) on the B site would reduce the dielectric loss caused by the increase in Fe3+ content. LFO adopts the Pmnb structure of GdFeO3 with an a+b−b− tilt system and 0.18 Å antiferrodistortive La3+ displacements along the [110]p direction. LMT (P21/a) has the same A-site displacement pattern and tilt system plus rock salt ordered B-site cations.7Phases in the BFTM–LMT–LFO (BLFTM) field (Figure 1 a) were prepared according to the protocol set out in Section 1 of the Supporting Information. Four distinct classes of powder diffraction patterns are observed. BFTM (t=0.96) is the only material with the rhombohedral R3c space group, and is surrounded by a two-phase region. At low LFO content and along the BFTM–LMT line, an orthorhombic perovskite phase and an Aurivillius phase coexist (XRD data Figure S1, Supporting Information). However, single phases emerge at higher substitution levels. These phases adopt the nonpolar Pmnb structure at high LFO/LMT content, but a new orthorhombic phase emerges between the Pmnb and multiphase regions, as shown by the evolution of the lattice parameters along the (1−x)BFTM–xLFO line in Figure 1 b. Powder second harmonic generation (SHG) measurements8 show that the non-Pmnb BLFTM samples are non-centric (x=0.28, 0.37, 0.40, 0.42), whereas the Pmnb materials (x=0.5, 0.67) are centric as expected. Thin films can be grown by pulsed laser deposition (Section 5, Supporting Information).
Figure 1
a) Phase diagram of the Bi(Fe2/8Ti3/8Mg3/8)O3–LaFeO3–La(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3 BLFTM system showing the four distinct categories of phase assemblage found in the system (▪ Pmnb; ▴ Pmc21; ○ two-phase mixture; ▵ R3c) and b) evolution of the reduced lattice parameters along the BFTM–LFO line expressed as the composition of BFTM. Filled and open symbols correspond to materials shown to be centric and non-centric, respectively, by second harmonic generation measurements.
a) Phase diagram of the Bi(Fe2/8Ti3/8Mg3/8)O3–LaFeO3–La(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3 BLFTM system showing the four distinct categories of phase assemblage found in the system (▪ Pmnb; ▴ Pmc21; ○ two-phase mixture; ▵ R3c) and b) evolution of the reduced lattice parameters along the BFTM–LFO line expressed as the composition of BFTM. Filled and open symbols correspond to materials shown to be centric and non-centric, respectively, by second harmonic generation measurements.The structural characterization of the new non-centric BLFTM phase will focus on the Bi0.72La0.28(Fe0.46Ti0.27Mg0.27)O3 (0.72BFTM–0.28LFO) composition. Of the candidate space groups which gave similar model-independent Lebail fits in the observed 2a× a× a cell only Pmnb and Pmc21 give acceptable Rietveld refinements of neutron (HRPD, GEM) (Figure 2 a) and synchrotron X-ray (ID31) data. The Pmc21 refinement is superior (Rwp=7.19 % versus 8.25 %), with the non-polar Pmnb model unable to satisfactorily fit the (110), (200), and (011) reflections (Figure 2 b).
Figure 2
Rietveld refinement of a) neutron diffraction data (HRPD) for 0.72BFTM–0.28 LFO in space group Pmc21. b) Comparison of the fits in Pmc21 (top) and Pmnb (bottom) for the (110), (200), and (011) reflections in 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO from the GEM neutron diffraction data. The circles represent the observed data, the thick line represents the model and the difference can be seen below.
Rietveld refinement of a) neutron diffraction data (HRPD) for 0.72BFTM–0.28 LFO in space group Pmc21. b) Comparison of the fits in Pmc21 (top) and Pmnb (bottom) for the (110), (200), and (011) reflections in 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO from the GEM neutron diffraction data. The circles represent the observed data, the thick line represents the model and the difference can be seen below.The Pmc21 structure of 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO (Section 3.1, Supporting Information) is adopted at low temperature by the high-pressure form of the B-site-driven CdTiO3 ferroelectric,9 (though more recent neutron diffraction studies have cast doubt on this10), the high field form of NaNbO311 and sol–gel synthesized NaNbO3.12 There are one B site and two A sites in the asymmetric unit, with the Rietveld refinement showing no indication of Bi/La cation ordering. The two A sites are arranged in alternating layers along a (Figure 3 a and b). Each A site has a ferroelectric displacement with a distinct amplitude (0.31 Å A1 and 0.17 Å A2) along the z ([110]p) direction (Figure 3 c), and distinct Bi–O environments (Figure 3 e,f). The B site (Figure 3 g) also has a 0.14 Å ferroelectric displacement along [110]p. There are also small (<0.05 Å) antiferrodistortive displacements at both A sites along b and c and at the B site along a (Figure 3 d). The ionic polarization calculated13 from the refined structure is 30.6 μC cm−2.
Figure 3
Pmc21 room temperature structure of 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO. A-site cations represented in green, B-site cations blue, and oxygen atoms in red. The centroids of the oxide anions coordinating the A1 site are shown in yellow, A2 centroids orange, B centroids white. Viewed along the a direction, with a) the A1 layer on top and b) the A2 layer on top. c) Viewed along b showing the FE displacements of A1, A2, and B along the c direction. d) Viewed along c showing the A1 and A2 AFE displacements along b and the B-site AFE displacements along a. e) Coordination environment of the A1 cation. There are four short Bi–O contacts (blue) four intermediate (green) and four long bonds (black). Displacement components (0, −0.09 Å, 0.31 Å) in the unit cell reference frame. f) Coordination environment of the A2 cation. This site has three short contacts (blue) and nine which are less distinctly separated than for A1, divided here into six bonds between 2.6 and 3 Å (green) and three bonds longer than 3 Å (black). Displacement components (0, −0.03 Å, 0.17 Å). g) B-site octahedral environment. Displacement components: (−0.06 Å, 0.009 Å, 0.14 Å).
Pmc21 room temperature structure of 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO. A-site cations represented in green, B-site cations blue, and oxygen atoms in red. The centroids of the oxide anions coordinating the A1 site are shown in yellow, A2 centroids orange, B centroids white. Viewed along the a direction, with a) the A1 layer on top and b) the A2 layer on top. c) Viewed along b showing the FE displacements of A1, A2, and B along the c direction. d) Viewed along c showing the A1 and A2 AFE displacements along b and the B-site AFE displacements along a. e) Coordination environment of the A1 cation. There are four short Bi–O contacts (blue) four intermediate (green) and four long bonds (black). Displacement components (0, −0.09 Å, 0.31 Å) in the unit cell reference frame. f) Coordination environment of the A2 cation. This site has three short contacts (blue) and nine which are less distinctly separated than for A1, divided here into six bonds between 2.6 and 3 Å (green) and three bonds longer than 3 Å (black). Displacement components (0, −0.03 Å, 0.17 Å). g) B-site octahedral environment. Displacement components: (−0.06 Å, 0.009 Å, 0.14 Å).Measurement of the synchrotron X-ray and neutron powder diffraction patterns as a function of temperature reveals a structural phase transition from Pmc21 to Pmnb above 650±5 °C (Figure S6). This structure (Section 3.2, Supporting Information) maintains the a+b−b− tilt system of Pmc21. There is only one crystallographically distinct A site, which is displaced 0.08 Å antiferrodistortively along [110]p and no B-site displacement.The atomic displacements for the polar Pmc21 BLFTM structure and the high-temperature (HT) Pmnb phase can be understood in terms of distortion modes derived from the m a aristotype cell, evaluated with the Isodisplace14 and Amplimodes15 programs (for further details and mode amplitudes see Section 3.3, Supporting Information). Pmnb (basis={(2,0,0),(0,1,−1)(0,1,1)}, origin=(0,0,0)) is produced by the R4+ (Figure 4 b) antiphase a0b−b− and in-phase M3+ (Figure S8a) a+b0b0 octahedral tilts which are the most significant modes. The associated antiferrodistortive A-site displacements along c, 0.08 Å from the centroids of their coordinating oxygens, are from the X5+ mode16 (Figure 4 c), giving the observed single A-site structure. The Pmc21 phase (basis={(2,0,0),(0,1,−1)(0,1,1)}, origin=(1/2,1/2,0)) is driven by the onset of the dominant Γ4− polar displacement at the A and B sites (Figure 4 a). This ferroelectric displacement is along [110]p, as in the Amm2 (O) phase of BaTiO317 and the high-field form of PbZrO3.18 In-phase combination of this ca. 0.22 Å magnitude polar displacement with the 0.08 Å antiferrodistortive displacement (X5+ mode) present in the Pmnb precursor affords the 0.31 Å displacement at the A1 site, while the out-of-phase combination gives the 0.14 Å polar displacement at the A2 site along the [110]p direction. The small A-site antiferrodisplacive R5+ mode (Figure S8b) along b is unchanged between Pmnb and Pmc21. There is a single B site in Pmc21 with the Γ4−-driven polar displacement along c accompanied by a smaller antiferroelectric displacement along a from the X3− mode (Figure 4 d). Only one B site results because the ferroelectric and antiferroelectric displacement directions are perpendicular.
Figure 4
Important displacement modes in the Pmc21 and Pmnb structures of BLFTM a) Γ4− ferroelectric displacement mode in Pmc21, b) R4+ out-of-phase tilting mode (both structures), c) the X5+ mode which is responsible for A-site antiferrodistortive displacements along c in both structures, and d) the X3− mode with antiferrodistortive B-site displacements along a in Pmc21. A-site cations represented in white, B-site cations black, and oxygen atoms in gray.
Important displacement modes in the Pmc21 and Pmnb structures of BLFTM a) Γ4− ferroelectric displacement mode in Pmc21, b) R4+ out-of-phase tilting mode (both structures), c) the X5+ mode which is responsible for A-site antiferrodistortive displacements along c in both structures, and d) the X3− mode with antiferrodistortive B-site displacements along a in Pmc21. A-site cations represented in white, B-site cations black, and oxygen atoms in gray.Electrical properties of BLFTM were measured on 97+% dense ceramics, with dielectric loss reduced by the addition of 0.2 wt % MnO2,19 which lowers tan δ from 0.036 to 0.025 at 1 kHz and from 0.589 to 0.034 at 1 Hz for 0.72BFTM–0.28 LFO. The low-frequency loss (Figure 5 a) is comparable to other shared A-site Bi-based ferroelectrics for example, Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 (>0.05 at 1 kHz).20 0.625BFTM–0.25LFO–0.125LMT has the lowest tan δ, suggesting that LMT is particularly effective in reducing the loss. All the Pmc21 [110]p displaced materials have higher permittivities than [111]p displaced rhombohedral BFTM, and the broad step-like decrease in permittivity for BFTM above 1 kHz, suggestive of a relaxation phenomenon, is not observed in the new polar phase. The magnitude of the relative permittivity rules out the possibility of contributions from extrinsic charge carriers at grain boundaries or electrode–sample interfaces.21
Figure 5
a) Room temperature permittivity and loss as a function of frequency of BFTM (▾), 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO (•), 0.625BFTM–0.25LFO–0.125LMT (▪), and 0.58BFTM–0.42LFO (▴). b) P(E) loop for 0.625BFTM–0.25LFO–0.125LMT, c) P(E) loop for 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO corresponding to d) the strain-field loop of the same composition. The dotted line in (b) and (c) represent the slope of the P(E) loop at the lowest voltage and is used to demonstrate nonlinearity.
a) Room temperature permittivity and loss as a function of frequency of BFTM (▾), 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO (•), 0.625BFTM–0.25LFO–0.125LMT (▪), and 0.58BFTM–0.42LFO (▴). b) P(E) loop for 0.625BFTM–0.25LFO–0.125LMT, c) P(E) loop for 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO corresponding to d) the strain-field loop of the same composition. The dotted line in (b) and (c) represent the slope of the P(E) loop at the lowest voltage and is used to demonstrate nonlinearity.The polarity shown in the structure and SHG measurements was confirmed by measurements of piezoelectric behavior. Strain-field measurement on Pmc21 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO (Figure 5 d) shows a butterfly loop, with a negative strain component. This negative strain is related to domain back-switching during the bipolar cycles and demonstrates typical ferroelectric behavior.22 The coercive field, calculated from the minimum in the strain field plot, is equal to 62 kV cm−1. The calculated strain is 0.003 % and the high-field d33 value obtained from the strain-field measurements is 1.68 pC N−1. The measured piezoelectric coefficient is 0.25 pC N−1.It was not possible to obtain a saturated P(E) (P=polarization, E=electric field) hysteresis loop before dielectric breakdown, which is a common problem in BiFeO3 ceramics.23 This can be attributed to a high Curie temperature and coercive field. The best P(E) loop came from the Pmc21 structure composition 0.625BFTM–0.25LFO–0.125LMT (Figure 5 b). Although the loop is not saturated, electrical polarization does not evolve as a linear function of the driving-field amplitude indicating nonlinearity (a necessity for ferroelectrics) and therefore domain wall motion.24
P(E) for 0.72BFTM–0.28LFO (Figure 5 c) is not saturated but shows non-linearity, indicating the presence of domain wall motion, consistent with the strain-field measurement on this composition.Figure 6 represents the A-site displacements in polar structures derived from the ideal perovskite, with the effect of octahedral tilting in systems containing smaller A cations than Pb2+ evident. The O′ Pmc21 structure found here corresponds to the polarization direction changing from [111]p in the R′ parent phase BFTM to [110]p, driven by the substitution of La3+ onto the A site, because of the tilts and displacements in this direction in LaFeO3. La3+ substitution into R′ BiFeO3 also induces [110]p A- and B-site displacements, but in this case the displacements are coupled antiferrodistortively to produce the antiferroelectric PbZrO3 structure (Figure 6; OA′ denotes a tilted antiferroelectric structure).25 The striking difference in the coupling of the [110]p displacements in the present BLFTM case may arise from the presence of Mg2+ and particularly Ti4+ on the B site in the BFTM parent, as Ti4+ produces ferroelectric [110]p displacements in O BaTiO3.17 The O′ structure features two A sites with distinct polarizations because of the competition between La-driven [110]p antiferrodisplacive motions and the dominant ferroelectric displacements along the same direction driven by Bi3+ and Ti4+, reflecting structural frustration between the bonding preferences of the two A-site cations. In the present BLFTM system, the O′ structure is separated by two-phase regions involving non-perovskite impurities from the R′ structure, and bridging this phase gap is important in the search for enhanced functionality associated with potential phase boundaries differing in polarization direction.
Figure 6
Examples of perovskites with A-site ferroelectric displacements along the [001]p, [110]p, and [111]p directions in relation to the ideal cubic perovskite a cell. The tilted T′ structure of BiInO3 is only accessible at high pressure:26 only the FE displacements are shown as the bismuth ion has an AFE component as well. The polar O′ structure observed for BLFTM in the present study contrasts with the antiferrodistortive coupling of [110]p displacements in the PbZrO3 structure of La-substituted R′ BiFeO3. The arrow representing the displacements in M-PZT indicates a Pb2+ displacement mainly along [100]p, but with a significant component along [110]p.
Examples of perovskites with A-site ferroelectric displacements along the [001]p, [110]p, and [111]p directions in relation to the ideal cubic perovskite a cell. The tilted T′ structure of BiInO3 is only accessible at high pressure:26 only the FE displacements are shown as the bismuth ion has an AFE component as well. The polar O′ structure observed for BLFTM in the present study contrasts with the antiferrodistortive coupling of [110]p displacements in the PbZrO3 structure of La-substituted R′ BiFeO3. The arrow representing the displacements in M-PZT indicates a Pb2+ displacement mainly along [100]p, but with a significant component along [110]p.
Authors: Karen E Johnston; Chiu C Tang; Julia E Parker; Kevin S Knight; Philip Lightfoot; Sharon E Ashbrook Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Craig A Bridges; Mathieu Allix; Matthew R Suchomel; Xiaojun Kuang; Iasmi Sterianou; Derek C Sinclair; Matthew J Rosseinsky Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2007 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Helen Hughes; Mathieu M B Allix; Craig A Bridges; John B Claridge; Xiaojun Kuang; Hongjun Niu; Stephen Taylor; Wenhai Song; Matthew J Rosseinsky Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 15.419