Literature DB >> 25821056

Patient's and physician's behavior on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia among the patients at the risk of clinical progression. A multicenter noninterventional trial in Slovakia by "Prostate and Expectations of Treatment: Epidemiology Research" (PETER) study group.

Peter Weibl1, Peter Laurinc, Roman Tomaškin, Tobias Klatte, Shahrokh Shariat F, Miroslav Helbich, Danica Fačkovcova, Peter Bujdák.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the survey was to assess physician's behavior and the global knowledge about patient's preferences and their psychological burden linked to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in an outpatient setting in Slovakia.
METHODS: The study included 36 outpatient urological clinics. Overall, 1132 newly diagnosed LUTS patients were screened within 1 month. A total of 454 questionnaires were obtained from 459 LUTS patients with risk of progression (RP). Inclusion criteria were: age > 50 years, IPSS > 8, prostate volume ≥ 30 cm3, and PSA ≥ 1.5 to ≤ 10 ng/ml.
RESULTS: The digital rectal examination, PSA testing, and urinalysis were used in all the centers as first visit examinations. The least frequently performed diagnostic procedure was uroflowmetry (74 %). The physician's preferred therapy for patients with RP was standard combined treatment in (52.6 %); followed by α-blocker alone (45 %) and monotherapy with 5-α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) only in 3 % of all asked urologists. Patient's mean age was 63.3 years (SD ±  7.4); baseline PSA value 2.2 ng/ml (SD + 3.2); prostate volume was 38.0 ml (SD ±  16.7 ml); Qmax was 11.5 ml/s (SD ±  4.6); and IPSS score 12.5 (SD ±  6.3). The most bothersome symptoms were nocturia (prevalence of ≥ 75 %), weak urinary stream (61 %), and retarded voiding (43 %). Patient's expectations of treatment were rapid improvement of symptoms (36.0 %), stabilization of symptoms (35.5 %), and reduction of potential risk of surgical intervention (25.8 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Our research reflects the physician's behavior, patient's self-perception of the disease and therapeutic priorities in the current outpatient practice in Slovakia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25821056     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-015-0751-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  9 in total

1.  Public, patient, and professional attitudes towards the diagnosis and treatment of enlarged prostate: A landmark national US survey.

Authors:  S Kaplan; M Naslund
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The importance of patient perception in the clinical assessment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its management.

Authors:  Sung Joon Hong; Walter Rayford; Luc Valiquette; Mark Emberton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Kevin T McVary; Claus G Roehrborn; Andrew L Avins; Michael J Barry; Reginald C Bruskewitz; Robert F Donnell; Harris E Foster; Chris M Gonzalez; Steven A Kaplan; David F Penson; James C Ulchaker; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: physician and patient preferences and satisfaction.

Authors:  M Emberton
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Treatment status and progression or regression of lower urinary tract symptoms in a general adult population sample.

Authors:  Nancy N Maserejian; Shan Chen; Gretchen R Chiu; Andre B Araujo; Varant Kupelian; Susan A Hall; John B McKinlay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Progression of lower urinary tract symptoms in older men: a community based study.

Authors:  J Kellogg Parsons; Timothy J Wilt; Patty Y Wang; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Douglas C Bauer; Lynn M Marshall
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  [Benign prostatic hyperplasia: patients' perception of medical treatment and their expectations. Results of a french survey involving patients treated with finasteride].

Authors:  P Teillac
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.070

8.  EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines).

Authors:  Stephan Madersbacher; Gerasimos Alivizatos; Jorgen Nordling; Carlos Rioja Sanz; Mark Emberton; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Understanding patient and physician perceptions of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Europe: The Prostate Research on Behaviour and Education (PROBE) Survey.

Authors:  M Emberton; M Marberger; J de la Rosette
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.503

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Symptom prevalence, bother, and treatment satisfaction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms in Southeast Asia: a multinational, cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Lap-Yin Ho; Peggy Sau-Kwan Chu; David Terrence Consigliere; Zulkifli Md Zainuddin; David Bolong; Chi-Kwok Chan; Molly Eng; Dac Nhat Huynh; Wachira Kochakarn; Marie Carmela M Lapitan; Dinh Khanh Le; Quang Dung Le; Frank Lee; Bannakij Lojanapiwat; Bao-Ngoc Nguyen; Teng-Aik Ong; Buenaventura Jose Reyes; Apirak Santingamkun; Woon-Chau Tsang; Paul Abrams
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.