Literature DB >> 25820723

A protocol for exosome isolation and characterization: evaluation of ultracentrifugation, density-gradient separation, and immunoaffinity capture methods.

David W Greening1, Rong Xu, Hong Ji, Bow J Tauro, Richard J Simpson.   

Abstract

Exosomes are 40-150 nm extracellular vesicles that are released from a multitude of cell types, and perform diverse cellular functions including intercellular communication, antigen presentation, and transfer of tumorigenic proteins, mRNA and miRNA. Exosomes are important regulators of the cellular niche, and their altered characteristics in many diseases, such as cancer, suggest their importance for diagnostic and therapeutic applications, and as drug delivery vehicles. Exosomes have been purified from biological fluids and in vitro cell cultures using a variety of strategies and techniques. In this chapter, we reveal the protocol and key insights into the isolation, purification and characterization of exosomes, distinct from shed microvesicles and apoptotic blebs. Using the colorectal cancer cell line LIM1863 as a cell model, a comprehensive evaluation of exosome isolation methods including ultracentrifugation (UC-Exos), OptiPrep™ density-based separation (DG-Exos), and immunoaffinity capture using anti-EpCAM-coated magnetic beads (IAC-Exos) were examined. All exosome isolation methodologies contained 40-150 nm vesicles based on electron microscopy, and positive for exosome markers (Alix, TSG101, HSP70) based on immunoblotting. This protocol employed a proteomic profiling approach to characterize the protein composition of exosomes, and label-free spectral counting to evaluate the effectiveness of each method in exosome isolation. Based on the number of MS/MS spectra identified for exosome markers and proteins associated with their biogenesis, trafficking, and release, IAC-Exos was shown to be the most effective method to isolate exosomes. However, the use of density-based separation (DG-Exos) provides significant advantages for exosome isolation when the use of immunoaffinity capture is limited (due to antibody availability and suitability of exosome markers).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25820723     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2550-6_15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  202 in total

Review 1.  Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery.

Authors:  Elena V Batrakova; Myung Soo Kim
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 2.  Tiny Shuttles for Information Transfer: Exosomes in Cardiac Health and Disease.

Authors:  Raj Kishore; Venkata Naga Srikanth Garikipati; Anna Gumpert
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  MiRNA extraction from cell-free biofluid using protein corona formed around carboxyl magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Shengqiang Xu; Seyedmehdi Hossaini Nasr; Daoyang Chen; Xiaoxian Zhang; Liangliang Sun; Xuefei Huang; Chunqi Qian
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-12-18

4.  Exosomes Produced from 3D Cultures of MSCs by Tangential Flow Filtration Show Higher Yield and Improved Activity.

Authors:  Reka Agnes Haraszti; Rachael Miller; Matteo Stoppato; Yves Y Sere; Andrew Coles; Marie-Cecile Didiot; Rachel Wollacott; Ellen Sapp; Michelle L Dubuke; Xuni Li; Scott A Shaffer; Marian DiFiglia; Yang Wang; Neil Aronin; Anastasia Khvorova
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Isolation of High-density Lipoproteins for Non-coding Small RNA Quantification.

Authors:  Danielle L Michell; Ryan M Allen; Stuart R Landstreet; Shilin Zhao; Cynthia L Toth; Quanhu Sheng; Kasey C Vickers
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Exosomal biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and patient monitoring.

Authors:  Amy Makler; Waseem Asghar
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.225

7.  Enhancement of Cutaneous Wound Healing by Dsg2 Augmentation of uPAR Secretion.

Authors:  Felicia Cooper; Andrew M Overmiller; Anthony Loder; Donna M Brennan-Crispi; Kathleen P McGuinn; Molly R Marous; Theresa A Freeman; Natalia A Riobo-Del Galdo; Linda D Siracusa; James K Wahl; Mỹ G Mahoney
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Cartilage Repair by Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes: Preclinical and Clinical Trial Update and Perspectives.

Authors:  Shahrbano Jahangir; Mojtaba Khozaei Ravari; Leila Taghiyar; Mohammad Amin Shamekhi; Mohamadreza Baghaban Eslaminejad
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Desmoglein 2 modulates extracellular vesicle release from squamous cell carcinoma keratinocytes.

Authors:  Andrew M Overmiller; Jennifer A Pierluissi; Peter J Wermuth; Sami Sauma; Ubaldo Martinez-Outschoorn; Madalina Tuluc; Adam Luginbuhl; Joseph Curry; Larry A Harshyne; James K Wahl; Andrew P South; Mỹ G Mahoney
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Efficient production and enhanced tumor delivery of engineered extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Dionysios C Watson; Defne Bayik; Avinash Srivatsan; Cristina Bergamaschi; Antonio Valentin; Gang Niu; Jenifer Bear; Mitchell Monninger; Mei Sun; Aizea Morales-Kastresana; Jennifer C Jones; Barbara K Felber; Xiaoyuan Chen; Ihsan Gursel; George N Pavlakis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.