PURPOSE: To compare acute and late toxicities, survival, and laryngeal preservation after radiotherapy alone (RR) or radiotherapy after partial laryngectomy (PLR) in early supraglottic laryngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1984 to 2012, 172 patients were treated in our department. We analyzed and compared toxicities (CTCAE v 4.0), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and the number of salvage total laryngectomies. RESULTS: Patients in the RR group were older (p = 0.05) and had more often comorbidities (p = 0.025); those in the PLR group had mostly T2 disease (p = 0.014). No difference in number of local, nodal, and distant recurrences was found. A higher incidence of late mild dry mouth in patients treated with RR (38 vs. 4 %, p = 0.000) was reported. At univariate analysis, only a younger age, a better performance status, and the absence of comorbidities favorably impacted on OS and DSS. No differences were found in DFS, LRFS, NRFS, MFS, and the number of rescue laryngectomies between the two groups. Younger age and a good performance status persisted as a predictive factor of better survival (OS and DSS) at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Radical radiotherapy appears to be a viable alternative to conservative surgery, even in elderly patients with poor performance status and comorbidities. Salvage laryngectomy in the RR group was compared favorably with those reported in other conservative surgery series and in the group treated postoperatively of our series.
PURPOSE: To compare acute and late toxicities, survival, and laryngeal preservation after radiotherapy alone (RR) or radiotherapy after partial laryngectomy (PLR) in early supraglottic laryngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1984 to 2012, 172 patients were treated in our department. We analyzed and compared toxicities (CTCAE v 4.0), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and the number of salvage total laryngectomies. RESULTS:Patients in the RR group were older (p = 0.05) and had more often comorbidities (p = 0.025); those in the PLR group had mostly T2 disease (p = 0.014). No difference in number of local, nodal, and distant recurrences was found. A higher incidence of late mild dry mouth in patients treated with RR (38 vs. 4 %, p = 0.000) was reported. At univariate analysis, only a younger age, a better performance status, and the absence of comorbidities favorably impacted on OS and DSS. No differences were found in DFS, LRFS, NRFS, MFS, and the number of rescue laryngectomies between the two groups. Younger age and a good performance status persisted as a predictive factor of better survival (OS and DSS) at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Radical radiotherapy appears to be a viable alternative to conservative surgery, even in elderly patients with poor performance status and comorbidities. Salvage laryngectomy in the RR group was compared favorably with those reported in other conservative surgery series and in the group treated postoperatively of our series.
Authors: Rubén Cabanillas; Juan Pablo Rodrigo; Jose Luis Llorente; Vanessa Suárez; Primitivo Ortega; Carlos Suárez Journal: Head Neck Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Jay S Cooper; Qiang Zhang; Thomas F Pajak; Arlene A Forastiere; John Jacobs; Scott B Saxman; Julie A Kish; Harold E Kim; Anthony J Cmelak; Marvin Rotman; Robert Lustig; John F Ensley; Wade Thorstad; Christopher J Schultz; Sue S Yom; K Kian Ang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-06-30 Impact factor: 7.038