Yunxian Liu1, Leena Hilakivi-Clarke2, Yukun Zhang1, Xiao Wang3, Yuan-Xiang Pan1, Jianhua Xuan3, Stefanie C Fleck4, Daniel R Doerge4, William G Helferich1. 1. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA. 2. Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. 3. Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Arlington, VA, USA. 4. Division of Biochemical Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Abstract
SCOPE: Soy flour diet (MS) prevented isoflavones from stimulating MCF-7 tumor growth in athymic nude mice, indicating that other bioactive compounds in soy can negate the estrogenic properties of isoflavones. The underlying signal transduction pathways to explain the protective effects of soy flour consumption were studied here. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ovariectomized athymic nude mice inoculated with MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were fed either Soy flour diet (MS) or purified isoflavone mix diet (MI), both with equivalent amounts of genistein. Positive controls received estradiol pellets and negative controls received sham pellets. GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array platform was used to evaluate gene expressions, and results were analyzed using bioinformatics approaches. Tumors in MS-fed mice exhibited higher expression of tumor growth suppressing genes ATP2A3 and BLNK and lower expression of oncogene MYC. Tumors in MI-fed mice expressed a higher level of oncogene MYB and a lower level of MHC-I and MHC-II, allowing tumor cells to escape immunosurveillance. MS-induced gene expression alterations were predictive of prolonged survival among estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer patients, whilst MI-induced gene changes were predictive of shortened survival. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that dietary soy flour affects gene expression differently than purified isoflavones, which may explain why soy foods prevent isoflavones-induced stimulation of MCF-7 tumor growth in athymic nude mice.
SCOPE: Soy flour diet (MS) prevented isoflavones from stimulating MCF-7 tumor growth in athymic nude mice, indicating that other bioactive compounds in soy can negate the estrogenic properties of isoflavones. The underlying signal transduction pathways to explain the protective effects of soy flour consumption were studied here. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ovariectomized athymic nude mice inoculated with MCF-7humanbreast cancer cells were fed either Soy flour diet (MS) or purified isoflavonemix diet (MI), both with equivalent amounts of genistein. Positive controls received estradiol pellets and negative controls received sham pellets. GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array platform was used to evaluate gene expressions, and results were analyzed using bioinformatics approaches. Tumors in MS-fed mice exhibited higher expression of tumor growth suppressing genes ATP2A3 and BLNK and lower expression of oncogene MYC. Tumors in MI-fed mice expressed a higher level of oncogene MYB and a lower level of MHC-I and MHC-II, allowing tumor cells to escape immunosurveillance. MS-induced gene expression alterations were predictive of prolonged survival among estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancerpatients, whilst MI-induced gene changes were predictive of shortened survival. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that dietary soy flour affects gene expression differently than purified isoflavones, which may explain why soy foods prevent isoflavones-induced stimulation of MCF-7 tumor growth in athymic nude mice.
Authors: Melissa S Cline; Michael Smoot; Ethan Cerami; Allan Kuchinsky; Nerius Landys; Chris Workman; Rowan Christmas; Iliana Avila-Campilo; Michael Creech; Benjamin Gross; Kristina Hanspers; Ruth Isserlin; Ryan Kelley; Sarah Killcoyne; Samad Lotia; Steven Maere; John Morris; Keiichiro Ono; Vuk Pavlovic; Alexander R Pico; Aditya Vailaya; Peng-Liang Wang; Annette Adler; Bruce R Conklin; Leroy Hood; Martin Kuiper; Chris Sander; Ilya Schmulevich; Benno Schwikowski; Guy J Warner; Trey Ideker; Gary D Bader Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Clinton D Allred; Nathan C Twaddle; Kimberly F Allred; Tracy S Goeppinger; Mona I Churchwell; Young H Ju; William G Helferich; Daniel R Doerge Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2005-11-02 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Ivana M Medigović; Jasmina B Živanović; Vladimir Z Ajdžanović; Aleksandra L Nikolić-Kokić; Sanja D Stanković; Svetlana L Trifunović; Verica Lj Milošević; Nataša M Nestorović Journal: Endocrine Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: S Hüser; S Guth; H G Joost; S T Soukup; J Köhrle; L Kreienbrock; P Diel; D W Lachenmeier; G Eisenbrand; G Vollmer; U Nöthlings; D Marko; A Mally; T Grune; L Lehmann; P Steinberg; S E Kulling Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Huaxin Song; Jennifer R Hughes; Russell T Turner; Urszula T Iwaniec; Daniel R Doerge; William G Helferich Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: Javad Sharifi-Rad; Cristina Quispe; Muhammad Imran; Abdur Rauf; Muhammad Nadeem; Tanweer Aslam Gondal; Bashir Ahmad; Muhammad Atif; Mohammad S Mubarak; Oksana Sytar; Oxana Mihailovna Zhilina; Ekaterina Robertovna Garsiya; Antonella Smeriglio; Domenico Trombetta; Daniel Gabriel Pons; Miquel Martorell; Susana M Cardoso; Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis; Usman Sunusi; Ramla Muhammad Kamal; Lia Sanda Rotariu; Monica Butnariu; Anca Oana Docea; Daniela Calina Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 6.543