| Literature DB >> 25820176 |
Guanghua Wang1, Liang Zheng2, Xiankai Li3, Juanli Wu4, Lijuan Zhang4, Jie Zhang4, Liling Zou4, Xin Li2, Yi Zhang3, Qian Zhou1, Huimin Fan2, Yang Li5, Jue Li4.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the viability of using brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) as a primary tool to screen metabolic syndrome (MetS), and to explore the risk factors of MetS in community populations. A total of 1914 subjects completed medical examination in Shanghai. BaPWV was significantly associated with the components of MetS. The area under curve (AUC) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) in total group were 62.50% and 60.00%-65.30% with the appropriate cut-off point being 1435 cm/sec. The AUC (95%CI) of three subgroups (40-50 yrs, 50-60 yrs and over 60 yrs group) were 75.30% (67.48%-83.35%), 63.35% (58.96%-67.60%), 55.37% (51.19%-60.01%), respectively. A clear pattern surfaced in the process of investigation: the younger were the subjects group, the better receiver operating characteristic (ROC) efficacy would emerge; and the higher sensitivity was, the better negative predictive value (NPV) would be. Male gender, high baPWV values, elevated uric acid (UA) and excess hypersensitive C reaction protein (hs-CRP) levels were stayed in the two regression models as the independent risk factors for MetS. We conclude that baPWV may serve as a potential screening tool for MetS at the cut-off point of 1435 cm/sec.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25820176 PMCID: PMC4377586 DOI: 10.1038/srep09438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Comparison of demographic characteristics between MetS and Non-MetS group
| Variables | MetS group | Non-MetS group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | mean ± SD | |||
| Age (years) | 60.7 ± 8.9 | 59.0 ± 8.8 | −3.58 | 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.65 ± 2.31 | 22.95 ± 2.66 | −34.37 | 0.001 |
| Gender [n(%)] | ||||
| Male | 175(35.64) | 444(31.20) | 3.28 | 0.069 |
| Female | 316(64.36) | 979(68.80) | ||
| Marital status [n(%)] | ||||
| Not married | 53(10.79) | 144(10.12) | 0.18 | 0.671 |
| Married | 438(89.21) | 1279(89.88) | ||
| Income(RMB per month) [n(%)] | ||||
| Low | 436(88.80) | 1249(87.77) | 0.36 | 0.545 |
| High | 55(11.20) | 174(12.23) | ||
| Education Level [n(%)] | ||||
| Low | 409(83.30) | 1164(81.80) | 0.56 | 0.453 |
| High | 82(16.70) | 259(18.20) | ||
| History of diabetes [n(%)] | ||||
| Yes | 69(14.18) | 86(6.11) | 31.84 | 0.001 |
| No | 417(85.82) | 1329(93.89) | ||
| Smoking [n(%)] | ||||
| Yes | 372(75.76) | 1126(79.13) | 2.43 | 0.119 |
| No | 119(24.24) | 297(20.87) | ||
| Drinking [n(%)] | ||||
| Yes | 403(82.08) | 1232(86.58) | 5.93 | 0.015 |
| No | 88(17.92) | 191(13.42) |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index;
Marital status: not married refers to both unmarried and divorced individuals;
Income level: high level means greater than or equal to 5000 RMB per month;
Education level: low education level means full time education of less than 12 years, and high level means greater than or equal to 12 years.
Comparison of biochemical characteristics between MetS and Non-MetS group
| Variables | MetS group | Non-MetS group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean | SD | mean | SD | |||
| baPWV (cm/sec) | 1677.60 | 323.14 | 1554.80 | 338.52 | −6.99 | 0.001 |
| UA (mg/dL) | 350.38 | 80.88 | 304.47 | 76.20 | −11.33 | 0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.34 | 0.99 | 5.17 | 0.96 | −3.19 | 0.001 |
| TG | 2.01 | (1.56, 2.69) | 1.31 | (0.97, 1.81) | −10.59 | 0.001 |
| BNP | 53.00 | (29.00, 93.00) | 54.00 | (32.00, 87.00) | 0.02 | 0.985 |
| Hs-CRP (mg/dL) | 2.73 | 2.83 | 1.90 | 3.30 | −4.96 | 0.001 |
| Hcy (mmol/L) | 13.02 | 8.03 | 12.27 | 7.34 | −1.73 | 0.060 |
| AI | 84.42 | 12.23 | 85.68 | 13.11 | 1.86 | 0.063 |
| ABI | 1.09 | 0.08 | 1.11 | 0.07 | 4.87 | 0.001 |
*Indicating the variances was not equal between two groups. Data was expressed as median and quartiles value;
Abbreviations: baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; UA, uric acid; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; Hs-CRP, hypersensitive C reaction protein; Hcy, homocyteine; AI, augmentation index; ABI, ankle-brachial index.
Correlation between baPWV and the components of MetS
| Variables | ||
|---|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.11 | 0.001 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 0.60 | 0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.14 | 0.001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | −0.09 | 0.001 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.05 | 0.027 |
| HbA1c (%) | 0.19 | 0.001 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 0.24 | 0.001 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic BP; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c.
Figure 1Simple linear correlation between baPWV and other variables.
(a) r = 0.60, P = 0.001; (b) r = 0.24, P = 0.001.
Figure 2ROC curve and AUC.
(a) Total group: AUC = 62.50%, 95%CI of AUC: 60.00%–65.30%, Cut-off point = 1435 cm/sec, Sensitivity = 76.06%, Specificity = 50.43% (Limitation), Youden index = 0.26; (b) 40–50 yrs group: AUC = 75.30%, 95%CI: 67.48%–83.35%; (c) 50–60 yrs group: AUC = 63.35%, 95%CI: 58.96%–67.60%; (d) >60 yrs group: AUC = 55.37%, 95%CI: 51.19%–60.01%.
Areas under the ROC curve, cut offs, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and Youden index of baPWV by age groups
| Age | AUC (%) (95%CI) | Cut-off point | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Youden index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40–50 (yrs) | 75.30 (67.48–83.35) | 0.001 | 1355 | 75.55 | 66.29 | 42.76 | 89.05 | 0.42 |
| 50–60 (yrs) | 63.35 (58.96–67.60) | 0.001 | 1427 | 68.35 | 53.28 | 32.78 | 83.47 | 0.22 |
| >60 (yrs) | 55.37 (51.19–60.01) | 0.018 | 1680 | 65.33 | 48.87 | 30.03 | 80.87 | 0.14 |
| Total | 62.50 (60.00–65.30) | 0.001 | 1435 | 76.06 | 50.43 | 33.84 | 86.34 | 0.26 |
Abbreviations: AUC, areas under the ROC curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
Risk factors and parameters of multiple logistic regression model
| Variables | ß | SE | Wald | OR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model1 | ||||||
| Gender | 0.40 | 0.13 | 9.04 | 0.001 | 1.49 | (1.15–1.93) |
| BaPWV | 0.73 | 0.13 | 30.15 | 0.001 | 2.08 | (1.60–2.71) |
| UA | 0.01 | 0.01 | 92.23 | 0.001 | 1.02 | (1.01–1.03) |
| Hs-CRP | 0.06 | 0.01 | 12.92 | 0.001 | 1.06 | (1.03–1.10) |
| Model2 | ||||||
| Gender | 0.45 | 0.17 | 20.91 | 0.001 | 1.58 | (1.11–2.23) |
| BaPWV | 0.73 | 0.13 | 30.24 | 0.001 | 2.68 | (1.60–2.71) |
| UA | 0.01 | 0.00 | 90.69 | 0.001 | 1.01 | (1.01–1.02) |
| Hs-CRP | 0.06 | 0.01 | 12.89 | 0.001 | 1.07 | (1.03–1.11) |
aAdjusted variables in model1: baPWV, gender (male vs. female), educational level, income level, marriage status, UA, Hs-CRP and BNP;
bBaPWV abnormal range: ≥1435 cm/sec, normal range, <1435 cm/sec;
cAdjusted variables in model2: baPWV, gender, educational level, income level, marriage status, smoking, alcohol drinking, UA, hs-CRP and BNP;
dRegression coefficient.
Figure 3OR value and its 95%CI in different models.
(a) Model 1; (b) Model 2.
Odds ratio and 95% CI of baPWV for MetS in regression model
| Quartile | Male | Female | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | |
| Q1 | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference |
| Q2 | 1.40 | 0.74–2.65 | 1.66 | 1.08–2.55 | 1.60 | 1.12–2.27 |
| Q3 | 1.66 | 0.89–3.10 | 1.52 | 0.95–2.41 | 1.63 | 1.13–2.35 |
| Q4 | 2.76 | 1.55–4.92 | 2.25 | 1.48–3.42 | 2.56 | 1.83–3.57 |
Adjusted for baPWV, gender, educational level, income level, marriage status, smoking, alcohol drinking, UA, hs-CRP and BNP; The baPWV was divided into four groups by quartile (<1378, 1378–1569, 1569–1818, ≥1818 cm/sec in men; <1324, 1324–1490, 1490–1738, ≥1738 cm/sec in women; <1336, 1336–1516, 1516–1704, ≥1704 cm/sec in total).