Literature DB >> 25820116

Increased Complications in Obese Patients Undergoing Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Matthew W Russo1, J Ryan Macdonell1, Megan C Paulus1, Jarod M Keller2, Mark W Zawadsky1.   

Abstract

The direct anterior (DA) approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has demonstrated successful short term outcomes in several studies. However, there is no consensus about which patients are appropriate candidates for DA total hip arthroplasty. It is also unclear if short term outcomes in obese patients undergoing THA through a DA approach are elevated in comparison to non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate complication rates and short term outcomes of obese, pre-obese, and normal body mass index (BMI) patients undergoing THA with a DA approach in a consecutive group of patients. This study was a retrospective review of 210 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral THA through a DA approach for osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis during the early peri-operative period. The study included 61 patients with normal BMI, 70 pre-obese patients, and 79 obese patients according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification (49 class I obese, 22 class II obese, and 8 class III obese patients). Patient charts were reviewed to determine differences in surgical time, length of stay, disposition, major complications, wound complications, and short term outcome measures. When comparing normal and pre-obese patients (BMI <30) to a combined group of WHO class I, II, and III obese patients (BMI >30), the obese group demonstrated increased surgical times by 12.7 minutes (P<0.0001), as well as increased length of stay (P=0.0303), narcotic use (P=0.0037), and assistive device use at two weeks (P<0.0030). In addition, major complications and wound complications were both significantly increased in the obese group (odds ratio [OR], 8.8; P=0.0493 and OR, 3.6; P=0.0431, respectively). There was also a trend toward increased use of rehabilitation facilities in the obese group at disposition, 15.4% vs 7.6% (P=0.0774). This study demonstrates that obese patients undergoing a DA approach have a 8.8 and 3.6 times increase in major and wound complications, respectively, compared to patients with a BMI <30. Obese patients also demonstrated significant increases in operative time, use of narcotics, use of assistive devices, and length of stay. There was a trend toward higher use of rehabilitation placement. While significant, these findings are similar to complication rates in the literature for other THA operative approaches. This study further defines the risks associated with performing THA on obese patients regardless of approach.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct anterior; obese; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25820116     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

1.  Greater trochanter chip fractures in the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Homma; Tomonori Baba; Hironori Ochi; Yu Ozaki; Hideo Kobayashi; Mikio Matsumoto; Takahito Yuasa; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-20

2.  Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA?

Authors:  Sara C Graves; Benjamin M Dropkin; Benjamin J Keeney; Jon D Lurie; Ivan M Tomek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Postoperative Pain Control and Opioid Usage Patterns among Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy.

Authors:  Theresa Tharakan; Sydney Jiang; Judd Fastenberg; Thomas J Ow; Bradley Schiff; Richard V Smith; Vikas Mehta
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  The direct anterior approach without traction table: How does it compare with the posterior approach? - A prospective non-randomised trial.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Arghya Kundu Choudhury; Souvik Paul; Lakshmana Das; Tushar Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 5.  Comparing early and mid-term outcomes between robotic-arm assisted and manual total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linsen T Samuel; Alexander J Acuña; Bilal Mahmood; Ahmed K Emara; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-30

6.  Bikini anterior hip replacements in obese patients are not associated with an increased risk of complication.

Authors:  I Nizam; D Dabirrahmani; A Alva; D Choudary
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 7.  Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures.

Authors:  Alexander J Acuña; Michael T Do; Linsen T Samuel; Daniel Grits; Jesse E Otero; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.928

8.  Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis.

Authors:  M Lane Moore; Joseph C Brinkman; Jordan R Pollock; David G Deckey; Justin L Makovicka; Joshua S Bingham
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-09-21

Review 9.  Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Obese Patient: Tips and Tricks and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  John-Henry Rhind; Camilla Baker; Philip John Roberts
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  No Difference in Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes Between Direct Anterior or Posterior Approach THA: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mithun Nambiar; Tze E Cheng; James R Onggo; Julian Maingard; John Troupis; Alun Pope; Michael S Armstrong; Parminder J Singh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.