Literature DB >> 25819864

A novel coronary angiography index (DILEMMA score) for prediction of functionally significant coronary artery stenoses assessed by fractional flow reserve: A novel coronary angiography index.

Dennis T L Wong1, Om Narayan2, Brian S H Ko2, Darryl P Leong3, Sujith Seneviratne2, Elizabeth L Potter2, James D Cameron2, Ian T Meredith2, Yuvaraj Malaiapan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angiographic evaluation of diameter stenosis has modest predictive value for functionally significant coronary artery stenoses as assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Lesion length and assessment of area of myocardium at risk (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation [BARI] Myocardial Jeopardy Index [MJI]) subtended by the stenotic coronary arteries are also predictors of functionally significant coronary artery stenoses. We sort to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DILEMMA score, which combines minimal lumen diameter (MLD), lesion length, and BARI MJI in prediction of significantly reduced FFR (≤0.8).
METHODS: We assessed patients who underwent coronary angiography and FFR. Lesion length and MLD were assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. Estimation of area of myocardium at risk subtended by coronary stenoses was performed using the BARI MJI.
RESULTS: A total of 296 patients (age 64 ± 10.6 years, 68% male, 497 vessels) were included. DILEMMA score was significantly higher in vessels with significant FFR, 6.09 ± 3.23 versus 3.84 ± 2.99 (P < .001). In the derivation cohort, the optimism-adjusted Harrell c statistic for DILEMMA score was 0.82 compared with 0.76 for BARI MJI, 0.75 for lesion length, and 0.7 for MLD. In the validation cohort, the c-statistic for DILEMMA score, BARI MJI, lesion length, and MLD was 0.88, 0.77, 0.81, and 0.72, respectively. The DILEMMA score was a better predictor of FFR ≤0.8 compared with MLD, lesion length, and BARI MJI individually (P < .001, P < .02, and P < .045, respectively) on Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparison.
CONCLUSIONS: DILEMMA score, taking into account MLD, lesion length, and BARI MJI, may have incremental predictive value beyond the individual indices alone for detecting functionally significant coronary artery stenoses.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25819864     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Miao Chu; Neng Dai; Junqing Yang; Jelmer Westra; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia verified by invasive FFR.

Authors:  Xiuhua Hu; Minglei Yang; Lu Han; Yujiao Du
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Stenotic flow reserve derived from quantitative coronary angiography has modest but incremental value in predicting functionally significant coronary stenosis as evaluated by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Potter; Colin Machado; Yuvaraj Malaiapan; Om Narayan; Brian S H Ko; Peter J Psaltis; Kiran Munnur; James D Cameron; Ian T Meredith; Dennis Thiam Leong Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-02

4.  The prognostic value of residual coronary stenoses after functionally complete revascularisation.

Authors:  Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

5.  Comparison of diagnostic performance between quantitative flow ratio, non-hyperemic pressure indices and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Ojas Hrakesh Mehta; Michael Hay; Ren Yik Lim; Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid; Michael Michail; Jun Michael Zhang; James D Cameron; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-06

6.  Application of the DILEMMA score to improve lesion selection for invasive physiological assessment.

Authors:  Michael Michail; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Nitesh Nerlekar; Justin E Davies; Andrew S P Sharp; Suneel Talwar; James D Cameron; Adam J Brown; Dennis T Wong; Anthony Mathur; Alun D Hughes; Om Narayan
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Clinical prediction models of fractional flow reserve: an exploration of the current evidence and appraisal of model performance.

Authors:  Wenjie Zuo; Rui Zhang; Mingming Yang; Zhenjun Ji; Yanru He; Yamin Su; Yangyang Qu; Zaixiao Tao; Genshan Ma
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

8.  Prediction of fractional flow reserve with angiographic DILEMMA score.

Authors:  Osman Beton; Hakkı Kaya; Okan Onur Turgut; Mehmet Birhan Yılmaz
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 9.  Impact of fractional flow reserve on decision-making in daily clinical practice: A single center experience in Egypt.

Authors:  Amr Elfaramawy; Mohamed Hassan; Michael Nagy; Ahmed ElGuindy; Mahmoud F Elmahdy
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2017-12-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.