Literature DB >> 25819729

Outcomes for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective review using the KJOC assessment score with two-year follow-up in an overhead throwing population.

Daniel F O'Brien1, Thomas O'Hagan2, Robert Stewart3, Alfred W Atanda4, Sommer Hammoud5, Steven B Cohen5, Michael G Ciccotti5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) often results in valgus elbow instability requiring reconstruction. No standardized and validated outcome measure has compared outcomes between surgical techniques and institutions in the overhead throwing athlete. The aim of this study was to use the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC score) to report functional outcomes in overhead throwing athletes undergoing UCL reconstruction. We predict that the KJOC score in our general throwing population will provide an accurate assessment of postoperative outcomes consistent with previously published reports.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 33 patients undergoing UCL reconstruction was carried out during a 5-year period between 2004 and 2009. Minimum follow-up was 2.2 years with an average of 3.7 years. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained surgeons using either the docking (n = 12) or modified Jobe technique (n = 21). Age, sport, position, and return to play status were obtained. The KJOC score was administered to assess final functional outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 33 athletes underwent UCL reconstruction-30 baseball players and 3 javelin throwers. Of these, 27 (82%) returned to their sport at their previous level in an average of 12.25 months. The overall average KJOC score was 76. Athletes who returned to their previous level of play had a mean KJOC score of 77. Those who were unable to return to play had a mean score of 69.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates consistent outcomes for UCL reconstruction using the KJOC shoulder and elbow score compared with previously reported data.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KJOC score; UCL reconstruction; validated assessment tool

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25819729     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  24 in total

1.  Repair of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow with internal brace augmentation: a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  William T Wilson; Graeme P Hopper; Paul A Byrne; Gordon M MacKay
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-12-19

Review 2.  Biomechanical testing of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  B M Saltzman; B J Erickson; J M Frank; J D Harris; G P Nicholson; B R Bach; N N Verma; A A Romeo
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 3.  A Review of Workload-Monitoring Considerations for Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Brittany Dowling; Michael P McNally; Ajit M W Chaudhari; James A Oñate
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  THE SUCCESS OF RETURN TO SPORT AFTER SUPERIOR LABRUM ANTERIOR TO POSTERIOR (SLAP) TEARS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Nicholas Freijomil; Scott Peters; Alexandra Millay; Tyler Sinda; Jordan Sunset; Michael P Reiman
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-10

Review 5.  Return to Sport and Sports-Specific Outcomes Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgina Glogovac; Rafael Kakazu; Alexander Constantine Aretakis; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-06-11

6.  A qualitative assessment of return to sport following ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in baseball players.

Authors:  Mitesh P Mehta; Vehniah K Tjong; Joshua G Peterson; Robert A Christian; Stephen M Gryzlo
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-29

7.  Do Clinical Results and Return-to-Sport Rates After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Differ Based on Graft Choice and Surgical Technique?

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Rachel M Frank; Bernard R Bach; Mark S Cohen; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Brian J Cole; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-10

8.  Trends in Patient, Physician, and Public Perception of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Social Media Analytics.

Authors:  Jonathan S Yu; James B Carr; Jacob Thomas; Julianna Kostas; Zhaorui Wang; Tyler Khilnani; Katie Liu; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-10

Review 9.  Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomy, Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Joshua D Harris; Peter N Chalmers; Bernard R Bach; Nikhil N Verma; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Peter N Chalmers; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.