| Literature DB >> 25819219 |
Haripada Maity1, Alex Wei2, Ethan Chen2, Jaafar N Haidar3, Arvind Srivastava2, Joel Goldstein2.
Abstract
Pace et al. (1995) [1] recommended an equation used to predict extinction coefficient of a protein. However, no antibody data was included in the development of this equation. The main objective of this study was to therefore investigate how the predicted value of the extinction coefficient is comparable to the experimentally determined extinction coefficient of antibodies measured by the Edelhoch method. We have measured the extinction coefficients (ɛ) of 13 IgG1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in phosphate buffer at pH 7.2. The maximum variability in the experimentally measured extinction coefficient of a given mAb molecule was found to be about 2%. Experimentally determined extinction coefficients of all mAbs were found to be lower than the predicted value, with the maximum difference found to being 4.7%. The highest and lowest values of experimental extinction coefficient among the thirteen IgG1 monoclonal antibodies obtained were 230525.9M(-1)cm(-1) (i.e. 1.55(mg/ml)(-1)cm(-1)) and 191,411.6M(-1)cm(-1) (i.e. 1.29(mg/ml)(-1)cm(-1)). A difference of <3% (with respect to mean value) was observed between the experimental and predicted values of the extinction coefficient. A comprehensive analysis and interpretation of the comparison of the predicted and experimentally determined extinction coefficient by the Edelhoch method is discussed in terms of structural characterization and accessible surface area (ASA).Entities:
Keywords: Accessible surface area (ASA); Edelhoch method; Molar extinction coefficient
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25819219 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Macromol ISSN: 0141-8130 Impact factor: 6.953