Literature DB >> 25819008

Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.

Vanessa L Hale1, Chia L Tan2, Rob Knight3, Katherine R Amato4.   

Abstract

Studies of the gut microbiome have become increasingly common with recent technological advances. Gut microbes play an important role in human and animal health, and gut microbiome analysis holds great potential for evaluating health in wildlife, as microbiota can be assessed from non-invasively collected fecal samples. However, many common fecal preservation protocols (e.g. freezing at -80 °C) are not suitable for field conditions, or have not been tested for long-term (greater than 2 weeks) storage. In this study, we collected fresh fecal samples from captive spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) at the Columbian Park Zoo (Lafayette, IN, USA). The samples were pooled, homogenized, and preserved for up to 8 weeks prior to DNA extraction and sequencing. Preservation methods included: freezing at -20 °C, freezing at -80 °C, immersion in 100% ethanol, application to FTA cards, and immersion in RNAlater. At 0 (fresh), 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks from fecal collection, DNA was extracted and microbial DNA was amplified and sequenced. DNA concentration, purity, microbial diversity, and microbial composition were compared across all methods and time points. DNA concentration and purity did not correlate with microbial diversity or composition. Microbial composition of frozen and ethanol samples were most similar to fresh samples. FTA card and RNAlater-preserved samples had the least similar microbial composition and abundance compared to fresh samples. Microbial composition and diversity were relatively stable over time within each preservation method. Based on these results, if freezers are not available, we recommend preserving fecal samples in ethanol (for up to 8weeks) prior to microbial extraction and analysis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ateles geoffroyi; Fecal microbial community; Fecal preservation method; Gut microbiota; Primate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25819008     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  48 in total

1.  Diet Versus Phylogeny: a Comparison of Gut Microbiota in Captive Colobine Monkey Species.

Authors:  Vanessa L Hale; Chia L Tan; Kefeng Niu; Yeqin Yang; Rob Knight; Qikun Zhang; Duoying Cui; Katherine R Amato
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Improving the standards for gut microbiome analysis of fecal samples: insights from the field biology of Japanese macaques on Yakushima Island.

Authors:  Takashi Hayakawa; Akiko Sawada; Akifumi S Tanabe; Shinji Fukuda; Takushi Kishida; Yosuke Kurihara; Kei Matsushima; Jie Liu; Etienne-Francois Akomo-Okoue; Waleska Gravena; Makoto Kashima; Mariko Suzuki; Kohmei Kadowaki; Takafumi Suzumura; Eiji Inoue; Hideki Sugiura; Goro Hanya; Kiyokazu Agata
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 3.  Progress of analytical tools and techniques for human gut microbiome research.

Authors:  Eun-Ji Song; Eun-Sook Lee; Young-Do Nam
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.422

4.  Evaluation of Sample Preservation Approaches for Better Insect Microbiome Research According to Next-Generation and Third-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Zi-Wen Yang; Yu Men; Jing Zhang; Zhi-Hui Liu; Jiu-Yang Luo; Yan-Hui Wang; Wen-Jun Li; Qiang Xie
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Evaluating Protocols for Porcine Faecal Microbiome Recollection, Storage and DNA Extraction: from the Farm to the Lab.

Authors:  Anixa Muiños-Bühl; Oscar González-Recio; María Muñoz; Cristina Óvilo; Juan García-Casco; Ana I Fernández
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Phylogenetic and ecological factors impact the gut microbiota of two Neotropical primate species.

Authors:  Katherine R Amato; Rodolfo Martinez-Mota; Nicoletta Righini; Melissa Raguet-Schofield; Fabiana Paola Corcione; Elisabetta Marini; Greg Humphrey; Grant Gogul; James Gaffney; Elijah Lovelace; LaShanda Williams; Albert Luong; Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello; Rebecca M Stumpf; Bryan White; Karen E Nelson; Rob Knight; Steven R Leigh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Shifts in the Fecal Microbiota Associated with Adenomatous Polyps.

Authors:  Vanessa L Hale; Jun Chen; Stephen Johnson; Sean C Harrington; Tracy C Yab; Thomas C Smyrk; Heidi Nelson; Lisa A Boardman; Brooke R Druliner; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; Peter Lance; David A Ahlquist; Nicholas Chia
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Validation of laboratory tests for infectious diseases in wild mammals: review and recommendations.

Authors:  Beibei Jia; Axel Colling; David E Stallknecht; David Blehert; John Bingham; Beate Crossley; Debbie Eagles; Ian A Gardner
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.279

9.  The maintenance of microbial community in human fecal samples by a cost effective preservation buffer.

Authors:  Chongming Wu; Tianda Chen; Wenyi Xu; Tingting Zhang; Yuwei Pei; Yanan Yang; Fang Zhang; Hao Guo; Qingshi Wang; Li Wang; Bowen Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Choo; Lex E X Leong; Geraint B Rogers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.