Literature DB >> 25817903

Treatment of type B periprosthetic femur fractures with curved non-locking plate with eccentric holes: Retrospective study of 43 patients with minimum 1-year follow-up.

A Lunebourg1, E Mouhsine2, S Cherix3, M Ollivier4, F Chevalley3, M Wettstein2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty that can be treated using different internal fixation devices. However, the outcomes with curved non-locking plates with eccentric holes in this indication have not been reported previously. The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) the union rate; (2) the complication rate; (3) autonomy in a group of patients with a Vancouver type B PFF who were treated with this plate. HYPOTHESIS: Use of this plate results in a high union rate with minimal mechanical complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with a mean age of 79 years ± 13 (41-98) who had undergone fixation of Vancouver type B PFF with this plate between 2002 and 2007 were included in the study. The time to union and Parker Mobility Score were evaluated. The revision-free survival (all causes) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The average follow-up was 42 months ± 20 (16-90).
RESULTS: Union was obtained in all patients in a mean of 2.4 months ± 0.6 (2-4). One patient had varus malunion of the femur. The Parker Mobility Score decreased from 5.93 ± 1.94 (2-9) to 4.93 ± 1.8 (1-9) (P = 0.01). Two patients required a surgical revision: one for an infection after 4.5 years and one for stem loosening. The survival of the femoral stem 5 years after fracture fixation was 83.3% ± 12.6%.
CONCLUSION: Use of a curved plate with eccentric holes for treating type B PFF led to a high union rate and a low number of fixation-related complications. However, PFF remains a serious complication of hip arthroplasty that is accompanied by high morbidity and mortality rates.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femur; Fracture; Hip; ORIF; Plate; Prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25817903     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  8 in total

Review 1.  Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David González-Martín; Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo; Mario Herrera-Pérez; José Luis Pais-Brito; Sergio González-Casamayor; Miriam Garrido-Miguel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Early experience with the use of trochanteric reattachment plate for the treatment of Vancouver type B 1 periprosthetic hip fractures.

Authors:  Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe; Sushil Churhe; Pritesh Omprakash Agrawal; Rajesh Shirishkar; Jehangir Malcolm Pestonji; Nicholas Antao
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-14

3.  Peri-prosthetic fractures around tumor endoprostheses: a retrospective analysis of eighteen cases.

Authors:  Nicolas Barut; Philippe Anract; Antoine Babinet; David Biau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Midterm Results of Consecutive Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Vancouver Type A and B.

Authors:  Klemens Trieb; Rainer Fiala; Christian Briglauer
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2016-08-24

5.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures around tumor endoprostheses treated with limited revision surgery combined with allograft: A case report.

Authors:  Jianhua Wu; Dengfeng Zhu; Jianjun Wang; Jie Wang; Yongguo Liu; Jun Lei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Outcome of surgical treatment of 54 Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty at mid term follow-up.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akkawi; Daniele Fabbri; Matteo Romantini; Massimo Laus; Alfonso Calogero
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-11-03

Review 7.  Treatment algorithm in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: osteosynthesis vs revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  David González-Martín; José Luis Pais-Brito; Sergio González-Casamayor; Ayron Guerra-Ferraz; Jorge Ojeda-Jiménez; Mario Herrera-Pérez
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-08-04

8.  Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Michael Blauth; Alexander Joeris; Andrea Blumenthal; Elke Rometsch
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.067

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.