Meghan E McGrady1, Jamie L Ryan2, Gabriella A Brown2, Christopher C Cushing3. 1. Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and Meghan.McGrady@cchmc.org. 2. Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and. 3. Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the guiding theoretical frameworks included in pediatric adherence-promotion interventions and characterize targeted domains using the theoretical domains framework (TDF), a standardized system developed by adult behavior change researchers. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases identified 47 articles describing pediatric adherence-promotion interventions. Data extraction was completed independently by two authors. Targeted intervention domains were classified using the TDF. RESULTS: The majority of interventions did not cite a guiding theoretical framework or cited multiple theories with overlapping domains. The TDF was a reliable categorization system and suggested that pediatric adherence-promotion interventions most commonly target knowledge, skills, and social influences. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric adherence-promotion interventions draw from a variety of theories and lack a consistent language for describing targeted domains. The adapted TDF proposed here is one method of reducing variability in intervention development and reporting and may facilitate efforts to identify the processes that improve adherence.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the guiding theoretical frameworks included in pediatric adherence-promotion interventions and characterize targeted domains using the theoretical domains framework (TDF), a standardized system developed by adult behavior change researchers. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases identified 47 articles describing pediatric adherence-promotion interventions. Data extraction was completed independently by two authors. Targeted intervention domains were classified using the TDF. RESULTS: The majority of interventions did not cite a guiding theoretical framework or cited multiple theories with overlapping domains. The TDF was a reliable categorization system and suggested that pediatric adherence-promotion interventions most commonly target knowledge, skills, and social influences. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric adherence-promotion interventions draw from a variety of theories and lack a consistent language for describing targeted domains. The adapted TDF proposed here is one method of reducing variability in intervention development and reporting and may facilitate efforts to identify the processes that improve adherence.
Authors: Andrew Prestwich; Falko F Sniehotta; Craig Whittington; Stephan U Dombrowski; Lizzie Rogers; Susan Michie Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Avani C Modi; Ahna L Pai; Kevin A Hommel; Korey K Hood; Sandra Cortina; Marisa E Hilliard; Shanna M Guilfoyle; Wendy N Gray; Dennis Drotar Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Emily M Fredericks; John C Magee; Lisa Opipari-Arrigan; Victoria Shieck; Andrew Well; M James Lopez Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2008-02-15
Authors: Sherif M Badawy; Leonardo Barrera; Mohamad G Sinno; Saara Kaviany; Linda C O'Dwyer; Lisa M Kuhns Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Owis Eilayyan; Aliki Thomas; Marie-Christine Hallé; Sara Ahmed; Anthony C Tibbles; Craig Jacobs; Silvano Mior; Connie Davis; Roni Evans; Michael J Schneider; Heather Owens; Fadi Al Zoubi; Jan Barnsley; Cynthia R Long; Andre Bussières Journal: Chiropr Man Therap Date: 2019-10-16
Authors: Owis Eilayyan; Regina Visca; Diana Zidarov; Patrick Ware; André Bussières; Sara Ahmed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 2.655