Literature DB >> 25817482

See it, grab it, or STOP! Relationships between trait impulsivity, attentional bias for pictorial food cues and associated response inhibition following in-vivo food cue exposure.

Paul Lattimore1, Bethan R Mead2.   

Abstract

Impulsivity is associated with appetitive behaviour such as heightened sensitivity to cues of reward. Impulsivity may thus confer a vulnerability to weight gain by virtue of over-responsiveness to rewarding appetitive cues. This vulnerability should be detectable as heightened cognitive and behavioural responsiveness to food cues, namely, an attentional bias to food-stimuli, subjective wanting, and loss of inhibitory control. We examined this proposition by measuring reactions to acute, in-vivo, food-cue exposure in low-impulsive and high-impulsive individuals. We expected that high-impulsive individuals would: (1) show a greater attentional bias towards pictorial food cues presented after in-vivo food cue exposure; (2) show a greater appetitive reaction to high-calorie snack foods; and (3) show poorer inhibitory control after in vivo exposure compared to control. Fifty female participants (25 yr ± 1.1; 24 kg/m2 ± 0.6) randomly allocated to either a high-calorie food-cue exposure or food-neutral control condition subsequently completed a food-cue visual probe reaction time task, subjective ratings of appetitive state and the Stop-Signal task. A significant Group-by-Duration interaction indicated that high-impulsives show slowed disengagement (longer RTs for 2000 ms duration) of pictorial food stimuli compared to their low-impulsive counterparts. Conversely, the low impulsive group show greater attentional bias than the high impulsive group (faster RTs) at the 500 ms duration, indicating speeded detection of pictorial food cues. High-impulsives showed poorer response inhibition compared to low-impulsives following in-vivo food-cue exposure. Impulsivity did not significantly moderate the effect of in-vivo cue-exposure on desire-to-eat ratings. The evidence we obtained regarding inhibitory control following in vivo food cue exposure suggests that high-impulsive individuals may be prone to overeat when their reward systems are activated, a hypothesis that requires further confirmation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional bias; Cue-reactivity; Impulsivity; Obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25817482     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  5 in total

1.  Trait-level facets of impulsivity and momentary, naturalistic eating behavior in children and adolescents with overweight/obesity.

Authors:  Andrea B Goldschmidt; Kathryn E Smith; Jason M Lavender; Scott G Engel; Alissa Haedt-Matt
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Cued to Act on Impulse: More Impulsive Choice and Risky Decision Making by Women Susceptible to Overeating after Exposure to Food Stimuli.

Authors:  Martin R Yeomans; Aaron Brace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Inhibitory Control and Hedonic Response towards Food Interactively Predict Success in a Weight Loss Programme for Adults with Obesity.

Authors:  Timo Brockmeyer; Maria Hamze Sinno; Mandy Skunde; Mudan Wu; Annika Woehning; Gottfried Rudofsky; Hans-Christoph Friederich
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Mindfulness-based emotional eating awareness training: taking the emotional out of eating.

Authors:  Paul Lattimore
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 5.  Free will in addictive behaviors: A matter of definition.

Authors:  W Miles Cox; Eric Klinger; Javad Salehi Fadardi
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2017-03-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.