Christine L Dixon1, Neil L Harrison2, Joseph W Lynch1,3, Angelo Keramidas1,2. 1. Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 3. School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: GABAA receptors mediate neuronal inhibition in the brain. They are the primary targets for benzodiazepines, which are widely used to treat neurological disorders including anxiety, epilepsy and insomnia. The mechanism by which benzodiazepines enhance GABAA receptor activity has been extensively studied, but there is little mechanistic information on how non-benzodiazepine drugs that bind to the same site exert their effects. Eszopiclone and zolpidem are two non-benzodiazepine drugs for which no mechanism of action has yet been proposed, despite their clinical importance as sleeping aids. Here we investigate how both drugs enhance the activity of α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used rapid ligand application onto macropatches and single-channel kinetic analysis to assess rates of current deactivation. We also studied synaptic currents in primary neuronal cultures and in heterosynapses, whereby native GABAergic nerve terminals form synapses with HEK293 cells expressing α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors. Drug binding and modulation was quantified with the aid of an activation mechanism. KEY RESULTS: At the single-channel level, the drugs prolonged the duration of receptor activation, with similar KD values of ∼80 nM. Channel activation was prolonged primarily by increasing the equilibrium constant between two connected shut states that precede channel opening. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: As the derived mechanism successfully simulated the effects of eszopiclone and zolpidem on ensemble currents, we propose it as the definitive mechanism accounting for the effects of both drugs. Importantly, eszopiclone and zolpidem enhanced GABAA receptor currents via a mechanism that differs from that proposed for benzodiazepines.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: GABAA receptors mediate neuronal inhibition in the brain. They are the primary targets for benzodiazepines, which are widely used to treat neurological disorders including anxiety, epilepsy and insomnia. The mechanism by which benzodiazepines enhance GABAA receptor activity has been extensively studied, but there is little mechanistic information on how non-benzodiazepine drugs that bind to the same site exert their effects. Eszopiclone and zolpidem are two non-benzodiazepine drugs for which no mechanism of action has yet been proposed, despite their clinical importance as sleeping aids. Here we investigate how both drugs enhance the activity of α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used rapid ligand application onto macropatches and single-channel kinetic analysis to assess rates of current deactivation. We also studied synaptic currents in primary neuronal cultures and in heterosynapses, whereby native GABAergic nerve terminals form synapses with HEK293 cells expressing α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors. Drug binding and modulation was quantified with the aid of an activation mechanism. KEY RESULTS: At the single-channel level, the drugs prolonged the duration of receptor activation, with similar KD values of ∼80 nM. Channel activation was prolonged primarily by increasing the equilibrium constant between two connected shut states that precede channel opening. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: As the derived mechanism successfully simulated the effects of eszopiclone and zolpidem on ensemble currents, we propose it as the definitive mechanism accounting for the effects of both drugs. Importantly, eszopiclone and zolpidem enhanced GABAA receptor currents via a mechanism that differs from that proposed for benzodiazepines.
Authors: Peter B Wingrove; Patrick Safo; Lola Wheat; Sally A Thompson; Keith A Wafford; Paul J Whiting Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Andrew D Krystal; James K Walsh; Eugene Laska; Judy Caron; David A Amato; Thomas C Wessel; Thomas Roth Journal: Sleep Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Marie S Prevost; Gustavo Moraga-Cid; Catherine Van Renterghem; Stuart J Edelstein; Jean-Pierre Changeux; Pierre-Jean Corringer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vincent F Capaldi; Jessica R Kim; Antigone A Grillakis; Maura R Taylor; Carla M York Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Magdalena Jatczak-Śliwa; Katarzyna Terejko; Marek Brodzki; Michał A Michałowski; Marta M Czyzewska; Joanna M Nowicka; Anna Andrzejczak; Rakenduvadhana Srinivasan; Jerzy W Mozrzymas Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 5.505
Authors: Logan A Becker; Hector Penagos; Francisco J Flores; Dara S Manoach; Matthew A Wilson; Carmen Varela Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 5.810