Literature DB >> 25817064

Pupil size reveals preparatory processes in the generation of pro-saccades and anti-saccades.

Chin-An Wang1, Donald C Brien, Douglas P Munoz.   

Abstract

The ability to generate flexible behaviors to accommodate changing goals in response to identical sensory stimuli is a signature that is inherited in humans and higher-level animals. In the oculomotor system, this function has often been examined with the anti-saccade task, in which subjects are instructed, prior to stimulus appearance, to either automatically look at the peripheral stimulus (pro-saccade) or to suppress the automatic response and voluntarily look in the opposite direction from the stimulus (anti-saccade). Distinct neural preparatory activity between the pro-saccade and anti-saccade conditions has been well documented, particularly in the superior colliculus (SC) and the frontal eye field (FEF), and this has shown higher inhibition-related fixation activity in preparation for anti-saccades than in preparation for pro-saccades. Moreover, the level of preparatory activity related to motor preparation is negatively correlated with reaction times. We hypothesised that preparatory signals may be reflected in pupil size through a link between the SC and the pupil control circuitry. Here, we examined human pupil dynamics during saccade preparation prior to the execution of pro-saccades and anti-saccades. Pupil size was larger in preparation for correct anti-saccades than in preparation for correct pro-saccades and erroneous pro-saccades made in the anti-saccade condition. Furthermore, larger pupil dilation prior to stimulus appearance accompanied saccades with faster reaction times, with a trial-by-trial correlation between dilation size and anti-saccade reaction times. Overall, our results demonstrate that pupil size is modulated by saccade preparation, and neural activity in the SC, together with the FEF, supports these findings, providing unique insights into the neural substrate coordinating cognitive processing and pupil diameter.
© 2015 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  executive function; frontal eye field; preparatory set; pupil dilation; superior colliculus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25817064     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  25 in total

1.  Dissociable saccadic suppression of pupillary and perceptual responses to light.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Paola Binda
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sensory feedback independent pre-song vocalizations correlate with time to song initiation.

Authors:  Divya Rao; Satoshi Kojima; Raghav Rajan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  Effects of blocked vs. interleaved administration mode on saccade preparatory set revealed using pupillometry.

Authors:  Naila Ayala; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reduced pupil dilation during action preparation in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Jan W Brascamp; Livon Ghermezi; Kassidy Fifer; Jeffrey D Schall; Sohee Park
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

7.  Transient Pupil Dilation after Subsaccadic Microstimulation of Primate Frontal Eye Fields.

Authors:  Sebastian J Lehmann; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Microsaccadic Eye Movements but not Pupillary Dilation Response Characterizes the Crossmodal Freezing Effect.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Hsin-I Liao
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-30

9.  Pupil dilation predicts individual self-regulation success across domains.

Authors:  Silvia U Maier; Marcus Grueschow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Intrasaccadic perception triggers pupillary constriction.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Mathôt; Jean-Baptiste Melmi; Eric Castet
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.