Literature DB >> 25816874

The influence of anisotropic nano- to micro-topography on in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis.

Ayesha Azeem1, Andrew English, Pramod Kumar, Abhigyan Satyam, Manus Biggs, Eleanor Jones, Bhawana Tripathi, Nandita Basu, Jan Henkel, Cédryck Vaquette, Niall Rooney, Graham Riley, Alan O'Riordan, Graham Cross, Saso Ivanovski, Dietmar Hutmacher, Abhay Pandit, Dimitrios Zeugolis.   

Abstract

AIM: Topographically modified substrates are increasingly used in tissue engineering to enhance biomimicry. The overarching hypothesis is that topographical cues will control cellular response at the cell-substrate interface. MATERIALS &
METHODS: The influence of anisotropically ordered poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) substrates (constant groove width of ~1860 nm; constant line width of ~2220 nm; variable groove depth of ~35, 306 and 2046 nm) on in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis were assessed. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: We demonstrate that substrates with groove depths of approximately 306 and 2046 nm promote osteoblast alignment parallel to underlined topography in vitro. However, none of the topographies assessed promoted directional osteogenesis in vivo.
CONCLUSION: 2D imprinting technologies are useful tools for in vitro cell phenotype maintenance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anisotropic topography; cell/biomaterial interface; gene analysis; osteogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25816874     DOI: 10.2217/nnm.14.218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)        ISSN: 1743-5889            Impact factor:   5.307


  7 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Franz E Weber
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Osteogenic activity of titanium surfaces with hierarchical micro-/nano-structures obtained by hydrofluoric acid treatment.

Authors:  Jianfei Liang; Shanshan Xu; Mingming Shen; Bingkun Cheng; Yongfeng Li; Xiangwei Liu; Dongze Qin; Anuj Bellare; Liang Kong
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 3.  Nanostructured scaffold as a determinant of stem cell fate.

Authors:  Lekshmi Krishna; Kamesh Dhamodaran; Chaitra Jayadev; Kaushik Chatterjee; Rohit Shetty; S S Khora; Debashish Das
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 4.  Effect of Controlled Microtopography on Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Chengxin Chen; Yuanjing Zhu; Ran Wang; Yu Han; Hongbo Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Assessing the combined effect of surface topography and substrate rigidity in human bone marrow stem cell cultures.

Authors:  Sofia Ribeiro; Eugenia Pugliese; Stefanie H Korntner; Emanuel M Fernandes; Manuela E Gomes; Rui L Reis; Alan O'Riordan; Yves Bayon; Dimitrios I Zeugolis
Journal:  Eng Life Sci       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Effects of topographical guidance cues on osteoblast cell migration.

Authors:  F M Refaaq; X Chen; S W Pang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  DNA/Magnetic Nanoparticles Composite to Attenuate Glass Surface Nanotopography for Enhanced Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation.

Authors:  Ilnur Ishmukhametov; Svetlana Batasheva; Elvira Rozhina; Farida Akhatova; Rimma Mingaleeva; Artem Rozhin; Rawil Fakhrullin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.329

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.