Literature DB >> 25816860

Reduction in pedometer-determined physical activity in the adult Danish population from 2007 to 2012.

Jeppe Matthiessen1, Elisabeth Wreford Andersen2, Anders Raustorp3, Vibeke Kildegaard Knudsen4, Mette Rosenlund Sørensen4.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the development in pedometer-determined physical activity from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 in the adult Danish population.
METHODS: The study population comprised two random samples of 18-75-year-old individuals who took part in cross-sectional studies in 2007-2008 (n=224) and 2011-2012 (n=1515). Pedometer data (sealed Yamax SW 200) were obtained for seven consecutive days. Data for 1624 participants (48.2% men) were included in the analysis. An overall step-defined activity level was examined based on a graduated step index (sedentary, low active, somewhat active, active, highly active). The pedometer-determined outcomes were analysed using regression models.
RESULTS: A borderline significant decline (p=0.077) from 8788 to 8341 steps/day (-446 (95% confidence intervals -50, 943)) was found between 2007-2008 and 2011-2012. Furthermore, a 23.7% (95% confidence intervals -41.7%, -0.1%) lower overall step-defined activity level was observed in 2011-2012 compared to 2007-2008. These changes were primarily due to a reduced level of activity among women. The proportion of individuals taking ⩾10,000 steps/day decreased non-significantly from 34.8% to 29.3%, whereas the proportion taking <5000 steps/day did not differ between survey periods.
CONCLUSIONS: This nationally representative survey suggests an overall reduction in the physical activity level among Danish adults. The reduction was due to a shift in the population distribution from higher to lower levels of activity. If this shift is true, it is worrying from a public health perspective. Our study result needs, however, to be confirmed by other population studies.
© 2015 the Nordic Societies of Public Health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scandinavia; Steps; pedometry; surveillance; trends

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25816860     DOI: 10.1177/1403494815578321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  9 in total

1.  Is Pedometer-Determined Physical Activity Decreasing in Czech Adults? Findings from 2008 to 2013.

Authors:  Jana Pelclová; Karel Frömel; Emil Řepka; Ladislav Bláha; Aleš Suchomel; Igor Fojtík; Dana Feltlová; Petr Valach; Svatopluk Horák; Jiří Nykodým; Michal Vorlíček
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  "What Is a Step?" Differences in How a Step Is Detected among Three Popular Activity Monitors That Have Impacted Physical Activity Research.

Authors:  Dinesh John; Alvin Morton; Diego Arguello; Kate Lyden; David Bassett
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Changes in Daily Steps and Body Mass Index and Waist to Height Ratio during Four Year Follow-Up in Adults: Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study.

Authors:  Kasper Salin; Mirja Hirvensalo; Costan G Magnussen; Risto Telama; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Jorma Viikari; Olli Raitakari; Tuija Tammelin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Defining Energy-Dense, Nutrient-Poor Food and Drinks and Estimating the Amount of Discretionary Energy.

Authors:  Anja Biltoft-Jensen; Jeppe Matthiessen; Karin Hess Ygil; Tue Christensen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Step volume and intensity in older adults: Commentary on "Association of accelerometer-derived step volume and intensity with hospitalizations and mortality in older adults: A prospective cohort study".

Authors:  Cayla McAvoy; Catrine Tudor-Locke
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 13.077

6.  Statistical methods to model and evaluate physical activity programs, using step counts: A systematic review.

Authors:  S S M Silva; Madawa W Jayawardana; Denny Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Physical fitness in community-dwelling older adults is linked to dietary intake, gut microbiota, and metabolomic signatures.

Authors:  Josué L Castro-Mejía; Bekzod Khakimov; Łukasz Krych; Jacob Bülow; Rasmus L Bechshøft; Grith Højfeldt; Kenneth H Mertz; Eva Stahl Garne; Simon R Schacht; Hajar F Ahmad; Witold Kot; Lars H Hansen; Federico J A Perez-Cueto; Mads V Lind; Aske J Lassen; Inge Tetens; Tenna Jensen; Søren Reitelseder; Astrid P Jespersen; Lars Holm; Søren B Engelsen; Dennis S Nielsen
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 9.304

8.  A 20-Year Follow-Up Study of Objectively Measured Physical Activity.

Authors:  Anders Raustorp; Andreas Fröberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Feasibility of using pedometers in a state-based surveillance system: 2014 Arizona Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Alberto Flórez-Pregonero; Janet E Fulton; Joan M Dorn; Barbara E Ainsworth
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 7.179

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.