OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present the updated methodological guidelines for economic evaluations of healthcare interventions (drugs, medical devices, and other interventions) in Belgium. METHODS: The update of the guidelines was performed by three Belgian health economists following feedback from users of the former guidelines and personal experience. The updated guidelines were discussed with a multidisciplinary team consisting of other health economists, assessors of reimbursement request files, representatives of Belgian databases and representatives of the drugs and medical devices industry. The final document was validated by three external validators that were not involved in the previous discussions. RESULTS: The guidelines give methodological guidance for the following components of an economic evaluation: literature review, perspective of the evaluation, definition of the target population, choice of the comparator, analytic technique and study design, calculation of costs, valuation of outcomes, definition of the time horizon, modeling, handling uncertainty and discounting. We present a reference case that can be considered as the minimal requirement for Belgian economic evaluations of health interventions. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines will improve the methodological quality, transparency and uniformity of the economic evaluations performed in Belgium. The guidelines will also provide support to the researchers and assessors performing or evaluating economic evaluations.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present the updated methodological guidelines for economic evaluations of healthcare interventions (drugs, medical devices, and other interventions) in Belgium. METHODS: The update of the guidelines was performed by three Belgian health economists following feedback from users of the former guidelines and personal experience. The updated guidelines were discussed with a multidisciplinary team consisting of other health economists, assessors of reimbursement request files, representatives of Belgian databases and representatives of the drugs and medical devices industry. The final document was validated by three external validators that were not involved in the previous discussions. RESULTS: The guidelines give methodological guidance for the following components of an economic evaluation: literature review, perspective of the evaluation, definition of the target population, choice of the comparator, analytic technique and study design, calculation of costs, valuation of outcomes, definition of the time horizon, modeling, handling uncertainty and discounting. We present a reference case that can be considered as the minimal requirement for Belgian economic evaluations of health interventions. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines will improve the methodological quality, transparency and uniformity of the economic evaluations performed in Belgium. The guidelines will also provide support to the researchers and assessors performing or evaluating economic evaluations.
Authors: Christiaan H W Heusdens; Katja Zazulia; Ella Roelant; Lieven Dossche; Damien van Tiggelen; Johan Roeykens; Elke Smits; Johan Vanlauwe; Pieter Van Dyck Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Lisa Van Wilder; Rana Charafeddine; Philippe Beutels; Robin Bruyndonckx; Irina Cleemput; Stefaan Demarest; Delphine De Smedt; Niel Hens; Aline Scohy; Niko Speybroeck; Johan Van der Heyden; Renata T C Yokota; Herman Van Oyen; Joke Bilcke; Brecht Devleesschauwer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jeroen T J M van Dijck; Thomas A van Essen; Ranjit D Singh; Hester F Lingsma; Suzanne S Polinder; Erwin J O Kompanje; Erik W van Zwet; Ewout W Steyerberg; Godard C W de Ruiter; Bart Depreitere; Wilco C Peul Journal: Trials Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Lisa Van Wilder; Brecht Devleesschauwer; Els Clays; Stefanie De Buyser; Johan Van der Heyden; Rana Charafeddine; Pauline Boeckxstaens; Dirk De Bacquer; Sophie Vandepitte; Delphine De Smedt Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 4.147