Literature DB >> 25816694

Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Posterior Renal Masses Is Associated with Earlier Hospital Discharge: A Single-Institution Retrospective Comparison.

Eric H Kim1, Jeffery A Larson1, Aaron M Potretzke1, Nicholas K Hulsey1, Sam B Bhayani1, R Sherburne Figenshau1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative outcomes, specifically hospital length of stay (LOS), after retroperitoneal and conventional transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared consecutive patients with a posterior renal mass undergoing retroperitoneal RAPN (n=116) versus transperitoneal RAPN (n=97) at our institution between July 2007 and March 2014. The surgical approach was based on patient and tumor characteristics, history of abdominal surgery, and surgeon preference. The primary outcome was postoperative LOS, and secondary outcomes included complication rate, inpatient narcotic pain medication use, and inpatient antiemetic use.
RESULTS: Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. A significantly great proportion of patients undergoing retroperitoneal RAPN had LOS equal to 1 day (57% vs 10%, P<0.01). Complication rates were similar between groups (P=0.37). Median pain medication use was also similar between groups (P=0.85). A significantly greater proportion of retroperitoneal RAPN patients, however, needed no antiemetics postoperatively (59% vs 43%, P=0.02). On multivariate analysis, transperitoneal RAPN was a significant predictor of LOS greater than 1 day (odds ratio=7.4, P<0.01), when controlling for age, sex, body mass index, patient comorbidity, previous abdominal surgery, baseline kidney function, nephrometry score, and tumor size.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with posterior renal masses, retroperitoneal RAPN significantly reduces their hospital LOS when compared with transperitoneal RAPN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25816694     DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

Review 1.  Frontiers in robot-assisted retroperitoneal oncological surgery.

Authors:  Wesley W Ludwig; Michael A Gorin; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Zachary A Hamilton; Michael T Marshall; Hak J Lee; Sean W Berquist; Abd-Elrahman S Hassan; Alp T Beksac; Charles A Field; Aaron Bloch; Fang Wan; Michelle L McDonald; Nishant D Patel; James O L'Esperance; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Trans-peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in posterior renal tumours: need for a risk-stratified patient individualised approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew McLean; Ankur Mukherjee; Chandan Phukan; Rajan Veeratterapillay; Naeem Soomro; Bhaskar Somani; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Umberto Carbonara; Daniel Eun; Ithaar Derweesh; Umberto Capitanio; Antonio Celia; Cristian Fiori; Enrico Checcucci; Daniele Amparore; Jennifer Lee; Alessandro Larcher; Devin Patel; Margaret Meagher; Fabio Crocerossa; Alessandro Veccia; Lance J Hampton; Francesco Montorsi; Francesco Porpiglia; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Comparison of Outcomes Between Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Meta-Analysis Based on Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Daqing Zhu; Xue Shao; Gang Guo; Nandong Zhang; Taoping Shi; Yi Wang; Liangyou Gu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  The future of "Retro" robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  David M Strauss; Randall Lee; Fenizia Maffucci; Daniel Abbott; Selma Masic; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

7.  Comparison of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Patients With Complete Upper Pole Renal Tumors.

Authors:  Liangyou Gu; Wenlei Zhao; Junnan Xu; Baojun Wang; Qiang Cheng; Donglai Shen; Yundong Xuan; Xupeng Zhao; Hongzhao Li; Xin Ma; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Retroperitoneal Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.

Authors:  Umberto Carbonara; Fabio Crocerossa; Riccardo Campi; Alessandro Veccia; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Daniele Amparore; Enrico Checcucci; Davide Loizzo; Angela Pecoraro; Michele Marchioni; Chiara Lonati; Chandru P Sundaram; Reza Mehrazin; James Porter; Jihad H Kaouk; Francesco Porpiglia; Pasquale Ditonno; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-26

9.  Retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: technique and early outcomes.

Authors:  A Porreca; D D'Agostino; D Dente; M Dandrea; A Salvaggio; E Cappa; A Zuccala; A Del Rosso; F Chessa; D Romagnoli; F Mengoni; M Borghesi; R Schiavina
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Retroperitoneal access for robotic renal surgery.

Authors:  Barrett G Anderson; Alec J Wright; Aaron M Potretzke; R Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.