Literature DB >> 25815708

Multiscale Speciation of U and Pu at Chernobyl, Hanford, Los Alamos, McGuire AFB, Mayak, and Rocky Flats.

Olga N Batuk1, Steven D Conradson2,1, Olga N Aleksandrova3, Hakim Boukhalfa1, Boris E Burakov4, David L Clark1, Ken R Czerwinski5, Andrew R Felmy6, Juan S Lezama-Pacheco7, Stepan N Kalmykov8,9, Dean A Moore6, Boris F Myasoedov9, Donald T Reed1, Dallas D Reilly6, Robert C Roback1, Irina E Vlasova8, Samuel M Webb10, Marianne P Wilkerson1.   

Abstract

The speciation of U and Pu in soil and concrete from Rocky Flats and in particles from soils from Chernobyl, Hanford, Los Alamos, and McGuire Air Force Base and bottom sediments from Mayak was determined by a combination of X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) element maps. These experiments identify four types of speciation that sometimes may and other times do not exhibit an association with the source terms and histories of these samples: relatively well ordered PuO2+x and UO2+x that had equilibrated with O2 and H2O under both ambient conditions and in fires or explosions; instances of small, isolated particles of U as UO2+x, U3O8, and U(VI) species coexisting in close proximity after decades in the environment; alteration phases of uranyl with other elements including ones that would not have come from soils; and mononuclear Pu-O species and novel PuO2+x-type compounds incorporating additional elements that may have occurred because the Pu was exposed to extreme chemical conditions such as acidic solutions released directly into soil or concrete. Our results therefore directly demonstrate instances of novel complexity in the Å and μm-scale chemical speciation and reactivity of U and Pu in their initial formation and after environmental exposure as well as occasions of unexpected behavior in the reaction pathways over short geological but significant sociological times. They also show that incorporating the actual disposal and site conditions and resultant novel materials such as those reported here may be necessary to develop the most accurate predictive models for Pu and U in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25815708     DOI: 10.1021/es506145b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Cleanup and Complexity: Nuclear and Industrial Contamination at The Santa Susana Field Laboratory, California.

Authors:  Nicola Ulibarri; Cameron L Tracy; Ryan J McCarty
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  A new μ-high energy resolution fluorescence detection microprobe imaging spectrometer at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource beamline 6-2.

Authors:  Nicholas P Edwards; John R Bargar; Douglas van Campen; Arjen van Veelen; Dimosthenis Sokaras; Uwe Bergmann; Samuel M Webb
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  The nature of Pu-bearing particles from the Maralinga nuclear testing site, Australia.

Authors:  Megan Cook; Barbara Etschmann; Rahul Ram; Konstantin Ignatyev; Gediminas Gervinskas; Steven D Conradson; Susan Cumberland; Vanessa N L Wong; Joёl Brugger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  High-energy resolution X-ray spectroscopy at actinide M4,5 and ligand K edges: what we know, what we want to know, and what we can know.

Authors:  Kristina O Kvashnina; Sergei M Butorin
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Uranium speciation in weathered granitic waste rock piles: an XAFS investigation.

Authors:  Akhil Tayal; Steven D Conradson; Aisha Kanzari; Florian Lahrouch; Michael Descostes; Martine Gerard
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.361

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.