| Literature DB >> 25815512 |
Yujia Fan1, Hui Chen1, Aifan Li2, Yunshu Shi1, Yuchao Zhang1, Qingchuan Feng1, Yan Sun1, Hong Zheng1, Ying He1.
Abstract
No coding sequence variants of the gene encoding 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (ALOX5AP) leading to amino acid substitutions have been identified. Therefore, variants in the ALOX5AP promoter region have received attention recently. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the promoter polymorphism rs17222919 is involved in the etiology of ischemic stroke (IS) in the Chinese Han population. We investigated the rs17222919 polymorphism by TaqMan genotyping in two independent Chinese Han samples: the first comprised 910 IS patients and 925 healthy inhabitants from the northern Henan Province, while the second included 1003 IS patients and 889 healthy controls from the southern Henan Province. Functional characterization of rs17222919 was performed by an in vitro luciferase assay. After adjusting for conventional risk factors, the G allele frequencies in the IS groups were significantly lower than that in the control groups of the two independent Chinese cohorts (19.0% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.004, odds ratio (OR) = 0.792, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.675-0.929; 18.8% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.002, OR = 0.782, 95% CI = 0.668-0.915, respectively). This was also observed in the large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and stroke of other undetermined etiology (SUE) subtypes (P = 0.019, OR = 0.815, 95% CI = 0.687-0.967; P = 0.021, OR = 0.815, 95% CI = 0.685-0.970, respectively). Additionally, the TG genotype and G allele frequencies were significantly lower in the IS compared with the control group in two female cohorts (P<0.05). Finally, the in vitro luciferase assay demonstrated that the G allele has a significantly lower transcription activity than the T allele (P = 0.031). Our study provides evidence that the promoter single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs17222919 is a potential genetic protective factor for IS in the Chinese Han population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25815512 PMCID: PMC4376390 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Stratified analysis of the relationship between rs17222919 Genotypes and susceptibility of IS.
| Population 1 | Case (n, %) | Control (n, %) |
| OR(95%CI) | Population 2 | Case (n, %) | Control (n, %) |
| OR(95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| male | n = 479 | n = 478 | Male | n = 542 | n = 458 | ||||
| TT | 308(64.3) | 302(63.2) | TT | 352(64.9) | 288(62.9) | ||||
| TG | 161(33.6) | 151(31.6) | 0.750 | 1.045(0.796–1.374) | TG | 177(32.7) | 147(32.1) | 0.913 | 0.985(0.753–1.289) |
| GG | 10(2.1) | 25(5.2) | 0.012 | 0.392(0.185–0.831) | GG | 13(2.4) | 23(5.0) | 0.027 | 0.462(0.230–0.929) |
| T allele | 777(81.1) | 755(79.0) | T | 881(81.3) | 723(78.9) | ||||
| G allele | 181(18.9) | 201(21.0) | 0.243 | 0.875(0.699–1.095) | G | 203(18.7) | 193(21.1) | 0.190 | 0.863(0.693–1.076) |
| female | n = 431 | n = 447 | Female | n = 461 | n = 431 | ||||
| TT | 285(66.1) | 248(55.5) | TT | 307(66.6) | 238(55.2) | ||||
| TG | 127(29.5) | 176(39.4) | 0.001 | 0.628(0.472–0.835) | TG | 134(29.1) | 172(39.9) | 0.0004 | 0.604(0.455–0.801) |
| GG | 19(4.4) | 23(5.1) | 0.303 | 0.719(0.382–1.351) | GG | 20(4.3) | 24(4.9) | 0.348 | 0.738(0.391–1.394) |
| T allele | 697(80.9) | 672(75.2) | T | 748 (81.1) | 648 (75.2) | ||||
| G allele | 165(19.1) | 222(24.8) | 0.004 | 0.717(0.571–0.900) | G | 174 (18.9) | 214 (24.8) | 0.002 | 0.704(0.562–0.883) |
P value and OR (95% CI) were adjusted for confounding factors.
* express the adjusted P value for significance P<0.05
Characteristics of the study populations.
| Population 1 | Population 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases(n = 910) | Controls(n = 925) |
| Cases(n = 1003) | Controls(n = 889) |
| |
| Sex(males/females) | 479/431 | 478/447 | 0.680 | 542/461 | 458/431 | 0.273 |
| Age(mean±SD, years) | 56.1±10.6 | 55.3±10.3 | 0.408 | 60.5±7.8 | 59.6±7.4 | 0.137 |
| Total cholesterol(mmol/L) | 5.05±0.89 | 4.72±1.04 | 0.000 | 4.76±1.13 | 4.45±1.21 | 0.004 |
| Total triglyceride(mmol/L) | 1.81±1.23 | 1.71±1.04 | 0.072 | 1.68±1.15 | 1.37±1.16 | 0.005 |
| Hypertension, (n, %) | 201(22.1) | 98(10.6) | 0.000 | 206(20.5) | 114(12.8) | 0.000 |
| Diabetes, (n, %) | 134(14.7) | 26(2.8) | 0.000 | 176(17.5) | 25(2.8) | 0.000 |
| Smokers, (n, %) | 112(12.3) | 64(6.9) | 0.000 | 166(16.6) | 58(6.5) | 0.000 |
| Alcohol, (n, %) | 133(14.6) | 77(8.3) | 0.000 | 168(16.7) | 60(6.7) | 0.000 |
*P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance
Genotype and allelic distribution of rs17222919 in IS and control subjects.
| Population 1 | rs17222919 | IS subjects (n = 910, n (%)) | Control subjects (n = 925, n (%)) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| TT | 593 (65.2) | 550 (59.5) | 1.000 | ||
| TG | 288 (31.6) | 327 (35.3) | 0.043 | 0.817 (0.671–0.994) | |
| GG | 29 (3.2) | 48 (5.2) | 0.016 | 0.560 (0.348–0.901) | |
| T allele | 1474 (81.0) | 1427 (77.1) | 1.000 | ||
| G allele | 346(19.0) | 423 (22.9) | 0.004 | 0.792(0.675–0.929) | |
| Population 2 | rs17222919 | IS subjects (n = 1003, n (%)) | Control subjects (n = 889, n (%)) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| TT | 658 (65.6) | 529 (59.5) | 1.000 | ||
| TG | 312 (31.1) | 313 (35.2) | 0.025 | 0.801 (0.660–0.973) | |
| GG | 33 (3.3) | 47 (5.3) | 0.014 | 0.564 (0.356–0.894) | |
| T allele | 1628 (81.2) | 1371 (77.1) | 1.000 | ||
| G allele | 378(18.8) | 407 (22.9) | 0.002 | 0.782 (0.668–0.915) |
P value and OR (95% CI) were adjusted for confounding factors.
* express the adjusted P value for significance P<0.05
Detailed association of rs17222919 between IS and control groups under different genetic models.
| Model | Genotype | Case (n, %) | Control (n, %) | χ2 |
| OR(95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population 1 | Dominant | TG+GG | 317(34.8) | 375(40.5) | ||||
| TT | 593(65.2) | 550(59.5) | 6.357 | 0.012 | 1.275(1.056–1.541) | |||
| Recessive | GG | 29(3.2) | 48(5.2) | |||||
| TT+TG | 881(96.8) | 877(94.8) | 4.575 | 0.032 | 1.663(1.039–2.661) | |||
| Additive | TT | 593(65.2) | 550(59.5) | |||||
| TG | 288(31.6) | 327(35.3) | 4.082 | 0.043 | 0.817 (0.671–0.994) | |||
| GG | 29(3.2) | 48(5.2) | 5.836 | 0.016 | 0.560 (0.348–0.901) | |||
| Population 2 | Dominant | TG+GG | 345(34.4) | 360(40.5) | ||||
| TT | 658(65.6) | 529(59.5) | 7.497 | 0.006 | 1.298(1.077–1.565) | |||
| Recessive | GG | 33(3.3) | 47(5.3) | |||||
| TT+TG | 970(96.7) | 842(94.7) | 4.640 | 0.031 | 1.641(1.041–2.585) | |||
| Additive | TT | 658(65.6) | 529(59.5) | |||||
| TG | 312(31.1) | 313(35.2) | 5.004 | 0.025 | 0.801 (0.660–0.973) | |||
| GG | 33(3.3) | 47(5.3) | 6.081 | 0.014 | 0.564 (0.356–0.894) | |||
P value and OR (95% CI) were adjusted for confounding factors.
* express the adjusted P value for significance P<0.05
Genotype and allelic distribution of rs17222919 in IS subtypes and controls.
| Population 1 | Control(n = 925) | Patients with ischemic stroke | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAA(n = 704) | SA0(n = 90) | SUE(n = 116) | ||
| TT | 550(59.5) | 450(63.9) | 60(66.7) | 83(71.6) |
| TG | 327(35.4) | 234(33.2) | 26(28.9) | 28(24.1) |
| GG | 48(5.1) | 20(2.9) | 4(4.4) | 5(4.3) |
| OR(95%CI),TT vs TG | 1.00 | 0.875(0.710–1.078) | 0.729(0.451–1.178) | 0.567(0.362–0.890) |
| P value | 1.00 | 0.209 | 0.195 | 0.013 |
| OR(95%CI),TT vs GG | 1.00 | 0.509(0.298–0.871) | 0.764(0.266–2.192) | 0.690(0.267–1.784) |
| P value | 1.00 | 0.012 | 0.616 | 0.441 |
| G allele (%) | 22.9 | 19.5 | 18.9 | 16.4 |
| P value | 1.00 | 0.019 | 0.223 | 0.025 |
| OR(95%CI) | 1.00 | 0.815(0.687–0.967) | 0.786(0.533–1.159) | 0.661(0.459–0.951) |
| Population 2 | Control(n = 889) | LAA(n = 675) | SAA(n = 198) | SUE(n = 130) |
| TT | 529(59.5) | 431(63.9) | 133(67.2) | 94(72.3) |
| TG | 313(35.2) | 225(33.3) | 56(28.3) | 31(23.8) |
| GG | 47(5.3) | 19(2.8) | 9(4.5) | 5(3.9) |
| OR(95%CI),TT vs TG | 1.00 | 0.882(0.713–1.092) | 0.712(0.505–1.002) | 0.557(0.363–0.856) |
| P value | 1.00 | 0.250 | 0.051 | 0.007 |
| OR(95%CI),TT vs GG | 1.00 | 0.496(0.287–0.858) | 0.762(0.364–1.593) | 0.599(0.232–1.544) |
| P value | 1.00 | 0.011 | 0.468 | 0.284 |
| G allele (%) | 22.9 | 19.5 | 18.7 | 15.8 |
| P value | 1.00 | 0.021 | 0.068 | 0.010 |
| OR(95%CI) | 1.00 | 0.815(0.685–0.970) | 0.774(0.588–1.020) | 0.631(0.444–0.896) |
P value and OR (95% CI) were adjusted for confounding factors.
* express the adjusted P value for significance P<0.05