PURPOSE: A spontaneous frameshift mutation, c.3481delC, in the Crb1 gene is the underlying cause of dysplasia and retinal degeneration in rd8 mice. The rd8 mutation is found in C57BL/6N but not in C57BL/6J mouse sub-strains. The development of ocular pathology in single knockout Ccl2-/-, Cx3cr1-/- and in double knockout Ccl2-/-, Cx3cr1-/- mice raised on a C57BL/6 background has been reported to depend on the presence of a rd8 mutation. In this study, we investigated the influence of the rd8 mutation on the retinal pathology that we previously described in the late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) mouse model with a heterozygous S163R mutation in the C1q-tumor necrosis factor-related protein-5Ctrp5+/- gene that was generated on a C57BL/6J background. METHODS: Mouse lines carrying the Ctrp5 S163R and rd8 mutations (Ctrp5+/-;rd8/rd8), corresponding controls without the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt), and wild-type mice with and without the rd8 mutation (Wtrd8/rd8 and Wtwt/wt, respectively) were generated by systematic breeding of mice in our L-ORD mouse colony. Genotyping the mice for the rd8 (del C at nt3481 in Crb1) and Ctrp5 S163R mutations was performed with allelic PCR or sequencing. Retinal morphology was studied with fundus imaging, histology, light microscopy, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Genotype analysis of the mice in L-ORD mouse colony detected the rd8 mutation in the homozygous and heterozygous state. Fundus imaging of wild-type mice without the rd8 mutation (Wtwt/wt) revealed no autofluorescence (AF) spots up to 6-8 months and few AF spots at 21 months. However, the accumulation of AF lesions accelerated with age in the Ctrp5+/- mice that lack the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt). The number of AF lesions was significantly increased (p<0.001), and they were small and uniformly distributed throughout the retina in the 21-month-old Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt mice when compared to the age-matched controls. Wild-type and Ctrp5+/- mice with the rd8 mutation (Wtrd8/rd8 and Ctrp5+/-;rd8/rd8, respectively) revealed an integrated retinal architecture with well-defined outer segments/inner segments (OS/IS), outer nuclear layer (ONL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), and inner nuclear layer (INL). The presence of pseudorosette structures reported in the rd8 mice between the ONL and the INL in the ventral quadrant of the retina was not observed in all genotypes studied. Further, the external limiting membrane was continuous in the Ctrp5+/-;rd8/rd8 and Wtrd8/rd8 mice. Evaluation of the retinal phenotype revealed that the Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt mice developed characteristic L-ORD pathology including age-dependent accumulation of AF spots, development of sub-retinal, sub-RPE, and basal laminar deposits, and Bruch's membrane abnormalities at older age, while these changes were not observed in the age-matched littermate WTwt/wt mice. CONCLUSIONS: The Wtrd8/rd8 and Ctrp5+/-;rd8/rd8 mice raised on C57BL/6J did not develop early onset retinal changes that are characteristic of the rd8 phenotype, supporting the hypothesis that manifestation of rd8-associated pathology depends on the genetic background. The retinal pathology observed in mice with the Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt genotype is consistent with the L-ORD phenotype observed in patients and with the phenotype we described previously. The lack of rd8-associated retinal pathology in the Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt mouse model raised on the C57BL/6J background and the development of the L-ORD phenotype in these mice in the presence and absence of the rd8 mutation suggests that the pathology observed in the Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt mice is primarily associated with the S163R mutation in the Ctrp5 gene.
PURPOSE: A spontaneous frameshift mutation, c.3481delC, in the Crb1 gene is the underlying cause of dysplasia and retinal degeneration in rd8 mice. The rd8 mutation is found in C57BL/6N but not in C57BL/6J mouse sub-strains. The development of ocular pathology in single knockout Ccl2-/-, Cx3cr1-/- and in double knockout Ccl2-/-, Cx3cr1-/- mice raised on a C57BL/6 background has been reported to depend on the presence of a rd8 mutation. In this study, we investigated the influence of the rd8 mutation on the retinal pathology that we previously described in the late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) mouse model with a heterozygous S163R mutation in the C1q-tumornecrosis factor-related protein-5Ctrp5+/- gene that was generated on a C57BL/6J background. METHODS:Mouse lines carrying the Ctrp5S163R and rd8 mutations (Ctrp5+/-;rd8/rd8), corresponding controls without the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt), and wild-type mice with and without the rd8 mutation (Wtrd8/rd8 and Wtwt/wt, respectively) were generated by systematic breeding of mice in our L-ORD mouse colony. Genotyping the mice for the rd8 (del C at nt3481 in Crb1) and Ctrp5S163R mutations was performed with allelic PCR or sequencing. Retinal morphology was studied with fundus imaging, histology, light microscopy, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Genotype analysis of the mice in L-ORD mouse colony detected the rd8 mutation in the homozygous and heterozygous state. Fundus imaging of wild-type mice without the rd8 mutation (Wtwt/wt) revealed no autofluorescence (AF) spots up to 6-8 months and few AF spots at 21 months. However, the accumulation of AF lesions accelerated with age in the Ctrp5+/- mice that lack the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt). The number of AF lesions was significantly increased (p<0.001), and they were small and uniformly distributed throughout the retina in the 21-month-old Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt mice when compared to the age-matched controls. Wild-type and Ctrp5+/- mice with the rd8 mutation (Wtrd8/rd8 and Ctrp5+/-;rd8/rd8, respectively) revealed an integrated retinal architecture with well-defined outer segments/inner segments (OS/IS), outer nuclear layer (ONL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), and inner nuclear layer (INL). The presence of pseudorosette structures reported in the rd8 mice between the ONL and the INL in the ventral quadrant of the retina was not observed in all genotypes studied. Further, the external limiting membrane was continuous in the Ctrp5+/-;rd8/rd8 and Wtrd8/rd8 mice. Evaluation of the retinal phenotype revealed that the Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt mice developed characteristic L-ORD pathology including age-dependent accumulation of AF spots, development of sub-retinal, sub-RPE, and basal laminar deposits, and Bruch's membrane abnormalities at older age, while these changes were not observed in the age-matched littermate WTwt/wt mice. CONCLUSIONS: The Wtrd8/rd8 and Ctrp5+/-;rd8/rd8 mice raised on C57BL/6J did not develop early onset retinal changes that are characteristic of the rd8 phenotype, supporting the hypothesis that manifestation of rd8-associated pathology depends on the genetic background. The retinal pathology observed in mice with the Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt genotype is consistent with the L-ORD phenotype observed in patients and with the phenotype we described previously. The lack of rd8-associated retinal pathology in the Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt mouse model raised on the C57BL/6J background and the development of the L-ORD phenotype in these mice in the presence and absence of the rd8 mutation suggests that the pathology observed in the Ctrp5+/-;wt/wt miceis primarily associated with the S163R mutation in the Ctrp5 gene.
The Crb complex, first identified in Drosophila, is required for polarity and adhesion in embryonic epithelia, stalk membrane morphogenesis in photoreceptors and for the formation of adherens junctions between cells in the retina [1-3]. In mice and humans, the Crb complex is involved in retinal integration and organization [4,5].The human crumbs homolog 1 (CRB1; Gene ID: 23418, OMIM: 604210) gene encodes a protein containing a signal peptide, 19 epidermal growth-factor (EGF) domains, three A-globular-like domains, and a transmembrane domain [6]. CRB1is part of the protein complex at adhesion junctions (AJ) and localized to the external limiting membrane (ELM) in the retina. Mutations in the CRB1 gene are associated with phenotypically diverse retinal disorders including Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), early onset retinitis pigmentosa (e.g., RP12), retinitis pigmentosa with coats-like exudative vasculopathy, and pigmented paravenous retinochoroidal atrophy [7-13]. Four percent of patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (arRP) and 10–15% of patients with autosomal recessive Leber congenital amaurosis (arLCA) carry mutations in the CRB1 gene [9-11]. The phenotypic diversity of the patients who carry CRB1 mutations has led to the hypothesis that environmental and genetic modifiers influence the severity and presentation of CRB1-associated retinal degeneration [11,14,15].The naturally occurring retinal degeneration 8 (rd8) mouse model carries a homozygous single base deletion (c.3481delC) in Crb1 (Crb1) causing early onset retinal degeneration, retinal folds, pseudorosettes, focal retinal dysplasia, and ocular spots [5]. The ocular spots correspond to the retinal folds and pseudorosettes that form due to abnormality in the adherens junctions between the photoreceptors and the Müller glia (MG) cells. The outer nuclear layer (ONL) and the inner nuclear layer (INL) are affected in rd8 mice. The deletion causes a frameshift resulting in a truncated Crb1 protein that consists of only the N-terminal extracellular domain [16].Similar to patients carrying CRB1 mutations, phenotypic variations are observed between and within mice strains homozygous for the rd8 mutation [17]. It has also been reported that the C57BL/6 lines provided by several commercial vendors harbor the rd8 mutation and present the characteristic Crb1-associated phenotype [17]. Although rd8 mice of the naturally occurring strain (Crb1) exhibit ocular spots in the inferior nasal quadrant, the eyes of mice with the rd8 mutation on the CAST/EiJ background (CAST/EiJ) are reported to have fewer spots than the naturally occurring strain [5]. About 19% of the CAST/EiJ mice do not develop ocular spots. Furthermore, N7 generation of Crb1 backcrossed with C57BL/6J did not develop retinal spots [5]. The retinal histology of the C57BL/6J mice homozygous for the rd8 mutation are normal, lacking retinal folds and photoreceptor inner segment (IS) disorganization suggesting that the C57BL/6J background is a strong modulator of the rd8 phenotype. In contrast, C57BL/6N, a sub-strain derived from C57BL/6J after 1951, harbors the rd8 mutation and invariably expresses the characteristic Crb1-associated phenotype [17]. The discrepancies in the rd8 phenotype between and within mouse strains provide clear evidence that genetic modifiers influence the development of rd8 pathology. Two genetically related homozygous rd8 mouse lines obtained from a backcross with C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice display variable phenotypes, and a genetic factor on chromosome 15 has been suggested to be responsible for this variation [18].The early onset ocular phenotypes observed in HLA-A29 transgenic mice and CCDKO mice are associated with presence of the rd8 mutation and are not due to mutations in the HLA-A29, Ccl2, or Cx3cr1 gene [17]. HLA-A29 transgenic and CCDKO mice carrying the rd8 mutation in the homozygous state exhibit retinal dysplasia. Interestingly, about 20–25% of the HLA-A29 transgenic mice with the rd8 mutation in the heterozygous state also develop dysplasia [17,19]. The genetic background of the rd8 mutation differentially modulates the retinal phenotype in the original CCDKO and the rederived Ccl2−/−, Cx3cr1−/−, and Ccl2−/−/Cx3cr1−/− double-knockout mice. The early onset retinal degeneration seen in Ccl2−/−/Cx3cr1−/− double-knockout mice are dependent on the rd8 mutation, rather than the synergistic effect of both mutations [19].We previously reported the ocular phenotype of a knock-in mouse model for late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) caused due to a heterozygous S163R mutation in the Ctrp5 gene [20]. These mice develop a late-onset retinal degeneration phenotype resembling the clinical phenotype observed in patients with L-ORD, including slower rod b-wave recovery, RPE abnormalities, drusen, Bruch’s membrane abnormalities including basal laminar deposits, predominant cone photoreceptor loss with onset around age 13 months, followed by rapid progression of retinal degeneration to near complete loss of cones by 21 months, and an age-dependent accumulation of hyperfluorescent spots [21-23]. Because the L-ORD mouse model (with Ctrp5+/− genotype) was developed using embryonic stem (ES) cells from mixed C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N strains and maintained on a C57BL/6J background, we investigated if the rd8 mutation is present in our colonies and whether it influenced the retinal phenotype associated with the Ctrp5S163R mutation. The L-ORD mouse model (Ctrp5+/−;+/−;
) and the wild-type littermate controls (Wt and Wt ) were evaluated for the presence of the rd8 mutation and its associated phenotype.
Methods
Animals
The L-ORD mice were generated using ES cells derived from mixed C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N strain background mice [20]. These mouse lines were expanded by crossing with the C57BL/6J strain obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) to maintain the line. Mice with the desired genotype were generated for the current study by selectively breeding the mice in our L-ORD mice colony to generate the required genotypes. All studies were performed using L-ORD mice and wild-type (WT) littermate mice of age groups 6–8, 9–11, 12–14, and 20–21 months. Five mice of each group were used for autofluorescent-scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AF-SLO) imaging analyses; three to five mice were used for light microscopy and immunohistochemistry (as described below in the Funduscopy section). All mice were maintained according to the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and with protocols approved by UCSD Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Detection of the rd8 mutation with allele-specific PCR and sequencing
The mice were genotyped, as described previously [17,20]. Mouse tail DNA was isolated with Qiagen reagents following the manufacturer’s instructions (Gentra Puregene Mouse Tail Kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Genotyping and sequencing for the Crb1c.3481delC and Ctrp5S163R mutations were performed using the primers described in Table 1.
Table 1
PCR primer for genotyping Wt ,Wt, Ctrp5+/−, mice and for amplification of rd8 locus for sequencing.
Gene
Allele
Primer name
Sequence (5′-3′)
Crb1
Wild-type
3663-mCrb1 mF1
GTGAAGACAGCTACAGTTCTGATC
3665-mCrb1 mR
GCCCCATTTGCACACTGATGAC
Crb1
Mutant
3664-mCrb1 mF2
GCCCCTGTTTGCATGGAGGAAACT TGGAAGACAGCTACAGTTCTTCTG
3665-mCrb1 mR
GCCCCATTTGCACACTGATGAC
Crb1
rd8
3666-Crb-F
GGTGACCAATCTGTTGACAATCC
3667-Crb-R
GCCCCATTTGCACACTGATGAC
Ctrp5
Knock-in
2855-Ctrp5-F
CCCCTACCTTTCGACCGT
2856-Ctrp5-R
GAAGAAAGAGGCGATGGACTG
The allele-specific PCR was performed using mCrb1mF1, mCrb1mF2, and mCrb1mR primers as described earlier [5]. The PCR reaction was carried out in a 20 μl reaction volume containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 100 μM of each dNTP, 1.6 μM each of forward and reverse primer for Wt allele and 0.8 μM of forward and 1.6 μM of reverse primer for rd8 mutate allele with 0.026U AmpliTaq DNA polymerase. Approximately 25 ng of DNA was taken for the reaction. The PCR reaction was initially denatured at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s with a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. Amplification of the wild-type allele produces a 220 bp fragment, and the mutant allele produces a 240 bp fragment. Confirmation of the rd8 mutation was performed by sequencing the amplicons [17]. Genotyping for the Ctrp5S163R knock-in mutation was performed as described earlier [20].
Fundoscopy
Fundoscopy and autofluorescence (AF) imaging were performed using a SPECTRALIS high-resolution, using a SPECTRALIS high-resolution, combination scanning laser ophthalmoscope and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (HRA+OCT) imaging system (Heidelberg Engineering, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) as previously described [20,24-26]. The number of AF spots per eye was counted, and the average number of AF spots per fundus in each group were calculated.
Retinal histology
L-ORD (n=5) and WT (n=5) mice with and without the rd8 mutation were enucleated and the eyes fixed with the immersion fixation method using 2% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Eyecups were postfixed in osmium-tannic acid-paraphenylenediamine to preserve neutral lipids [27] before being embedded in Epon 812 per our published methods [28]. Thin sections were examined on a JEM 1200EX II electron (JOEL USA, Inc. Peabody, MA) microscope. Additional eyecups were embedded in methacrylate [17]. Sections (8–10 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined under a light microscope at 20X magnification. Retina cryosections (8–10 μm), obtained from the eyes fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, were stained for β-catenin using specific antibodies and images were captured with an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope.
Antibodies
S-opsin antibodies, goat polyclonal (1:200 Chemicon, Temecula, CA), and M-opsin antibody rabbit polyclonal (1:200, Chemicon) were obtained from a commercial source. The anti-mouse secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa fluor 555 and Alexa fluor 488 (1:1,000, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) were used to detect the protein expression with immunohistochemistry. β-catenin antibody (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) was used to check the integrity of the external limiting membrane (ELM).
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance between the number of AF spots in the mutant and wild-type mice was determined using the two-tailed, independent Student t test.
Results
Detection of the rd8 mutation in L-ORD and WT mice
Analysis of mice in the L-ORD mouse model colony revealed the presence of the rd8 mutation. The location and identity of the mutation were confirmed with dideoxy sequencing (Figure 1A). In the L-ORD mouse model colony, the rd8 mutation was detected in the L-ORD mice and the WT littermate controls (Figure 1B). The majority of the mice carried the rd8 mutation in the homozygous or heterozygous state, while a minor proportion were negative for the rd8 mutation.
Figure 1
Detection of the rd8 mutation with sequencing and agarose gel analysis. A: Sequence of the Crb1 locus showing the wild-type and the c.3481delC mutant allele in the homozygous state. The asterisk denotes the deletion. B: Agarose gel electrophoresis showing the migration of PCR amplicons for the rd8 locus from Wt mice (220 bp), mice heterozygous (244 bp and 220 bp) and homozygous (244 bp) for the rd8 mutation. The DNA ladder was included to indicate the size of amplicons. Wt, Crb1 wild-type; Wt, heterozygous for the Crb1 mutation; Wt, homozygous for the Crb1 mutation.
Detection of the rd8 mutation with sequencing and agarose gel analysis. A: Sequence of the Crb1 locus showing the wild-type and the c.3481delC mutant allele in the homozygous state. The asterisk denotes the deletion. B: Agarose gel electrophoresis showing the migration of PCR amplicons for the rd8 locus from Wt mice (220 bp), mice heterozygous (244 bp and 220 bp) and homozygous (244 bp) for the rd8 mutation. The DNA ladder was included to indicate the size of amplicons. Wt, Crb1 wild-type; Wt, heterozygous for the Crb1 mutation; Wt, homozygous for the Crb1 mutation.
Ocular phenotype of L-ORD (Ctrp5+/−;) and WT littermate control (Wt) mice
The presence of ocular spots is a common finding in L-ORD and rd8 mice strains. AF-SLO was used to document the ocular phenotype of Ctrp5+/−; mice (n=5) and age-matched littermates Wt (n=5; Figure 2). Autofluorescent spots were not observed in the 6- to 8-month-old and 9- to 11-month-old WT mice (0±0). Few spots were visualized in the 12- to 14-month-old and 20- to 21-month-old WT mice (23±7 and 70±26, respectively). In contrast, the Ctrp5mice displayed more spots by 12–14 months (116±72). The accumulation of AF spots in the Ctrp5+/−; mice was accelerated with age and increased several fold by 20–21 months (1569±105). The AF spots were small and round and distributed evenly throughout the retina in the Ctrp5+/−; mice.
Figure 2
Autofluorescence SLO fundus images of L-ORD mice lacking the rd8 mutation. A: Representative autofluorescent-scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AF-SLO) images of C57BL/6 wild-type control mice free of the rd8 mutation (Wt) and late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) mice free of the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5). The Wt mice showed few AF spots by 21 months. However, the AF spots were significantly increased in the Ctrp5 mice by 21 months of age. Magnification bar=200 μm. B: Quantification of the AF spots in Wt (black triangle) and Ctrp5 (black diamond) per the AF-SLO images. The number of AF spots is shown as the mean number of spots ± SD. There was an age-related increase in AF spots (linear regression plot) in both genotypes. However, the AF spots accumulated to a high number in L-ORD mice by 21 months when compared to the age-matched control mice (p<0.001).
Autofluorescence SLO fundus images of L-ORD mice lacking the rd8 mutation. A: Representative autofluorescent-scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AF-SLO) images of C57BL/6 wild-type control mice free of the rd8 mutation (Wt) and late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) mice free of the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5). The Wt mice showed few AF spots by 21 months. However, the AF spots were significantly increased in the Ctrp5mice by 21 months of age. Magnification bar=200 μm. B: Quantification of the AF spots in Wt (black triangle) and Ctrp5 (black diamond) per the AF-SLO images. The number of AF spots is shown as the mean number of spots ± SD. There was an age-related increase in AF spots (linear regression plot) in both genotypes. However, the AF spots accumulated to a high number in L-ORD mice by 21 months when compared to the age-matched control mice (p<0.001).
Retinal morphology of Ctrp5 mice
Retinal morphology was studied to evaluate the integrity of the retinal tissue. The gross retinal morphology of the Wt mice was compared with the Wt mice in our L-ORD mouse colony (Figure 3). Both sets of wild-type mice showed normal retinal morphology and lacked the changes associated with the rd8 genotype at 8 months of age. The INL, ONL, outer plexiform layer (OPL), and outer segments (OS) were normal in these mice. In addition, pseudorosette structures in the OPL and sub-retinal space that are prominent characteristic features of the rd8 phenotype were absent in all mice.
Figure 3
Histological analysis of the retina structure of 8-month-old Wt and Wt mice. The retinas from 8-month-old Wt and Wt mice showed no dysplasia. mo, month; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ELM, external limiting membrane; ONL, outer- nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, glial cell layer. Magnification bar=2 μm.
Histological analysis of the retina structure of 8-month-old Wt and Wt mice. The retinas from 8-month-old Wt and Wt mice showed no dysplasia. mo, month; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ELM, external limiting membrane; ONL, outer- nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, glial cell layer. Magnification bar=2 μm.The retinal architecture of the Ctrp5mice was studied up to 21 months and compared with the phenotype of the age-matched Wt littermate control mice (Figure 4). Under light microscopy, these mice did not show significant morphological changes including the abnormalities typically associated with the rd8 phenotype.
Figure 4
Histological analysis of the retinal structure of the L-ORD mice. Retinal changes typically associated with the rd8 phenotype were not observed in either the Ctrp5 or Wt mice at 20–21 months. In addition, the retinal morphology of these mice lacked gross abnormalities that can be detected with light microscopy. Magnification bar=20 μm.
Histological analysis of the retinal structure of the L-ORD mice. Retinal changes typically associated with the rd8 phenotype were not observed in either the Ctrp5 or Wt mice at 20–21 months. In addition, the retinal morphology of these mice lacked gross abnormalities that can be detected with light microscopy. Magnification bar=20 μm.Ultrastructural analysis of the RPE was performed on Ctrp5mice (n=3) at 9, 14, and 21 months. The Wt mice (n=3) aged 21 months were used as a control to compare the pathology (Figure 5). The Wt mice had normal RPE with well-organized basal infoldings and an intact Bruch’s membrane. RPE abnormalities were prominent as early as 9 months in the Ctrp5+/−; mice. The RPE basal infoldings were disorganized and displaced from Bruch’s membrane. Numerous vacuoles and phagolysosomes were found throughout the cytoplasm, and several packets of undigested membranous debris were found in the basal RPE. Focal basal laminar deposits and basal linear deposits were found in Bruch’s membrane by 14 months. The same abnormalities were also found in the 21-month-old Ctrp5+/−; mice.
Figure 5
Ultrastructural analysis of RPE and sub-RPE areas from Wt and Ctrp5 mice. Areas enclosed in boxes in A–D are magnified in panels E–H. RPE from control mice (A, E) showed no abnormalities at 21 months of age. The RPE basal infoldings are organized (star), the cytoplasm is homogenous, and Bruch’s membrane is intact (bracket). In contrast, the RPE of the Ctrp5 mice (B, C, D, F, G, H) has structural aberrations beginning at 9 months of age. The RPE basal infoldings are disorganized (stars). Numerous packets of undigested membranous debris are found in the basal RPE (black arrowheads). Multiple vacuoles (white arrows) and phagolysosomes (black arrows) are found throughout the cytoplasm. Focal basal laminar deposits (white arrowheads) are present in Bruch’s membrane, as are basal linear deposits (asterisks). All marking are identical to those used in all panels. Magnification bars=200 μm in the top row and 500 μm in the bottom row.
Ultrastructural analysis of RPE and sub-RPE areas from Wt and Ctrp5mice. Areas enclosed in boxes in A–D are magnified in panels E–H. RPE from control mice (A, E) showed no abnormalities at 21 months of age. The RPE basal infoldings are organized (star), the cytoplasm is homogenous, and Bruch’s membrane is intact (bracket). In contrast, the RPE of the Ctrp5mice (B, C, D, F, G, H) has structural aberrations beginning at 9 months of age. The RPE basal infoldings are disorganized (stars). Numerous packets of undigested membranous debris are found in the basal RPE (black arrowheads). Multiple vacuoles (white arrows) and phagolysosomes (black arrows) are found throughout the cytoplasm. Focal basal laminar deposits (white arrowheads) are present in Bruch’s membrane, as are basal linear deposits (asterisks). All marking are identical to those used in all panels. Magnification bars=200 μm in the top row and 500 μm in the bottom row.
External limiting membrane is continuous in Ctrp5 mouse
To determine whether the loss of Crb1 affects ELM integrity, we studied the localization of β-catenin in the Ctrp5 and Ctrp5+/−; mice and compared its localization with the Wt mouse retina. The anti-β-catenin antibody strongly stained the ELM in all mice including those with the rd8 mutation (Figure 6), and the pattern of staining indicated the presence of continuous ELM not only in the Wt mice but also in the mice that had the rd8 mutation. These results demonstrate the presence of a continuous ELM.
Figure 6
Continuous ELM staining with anti-adherence junction marker in L-ORD mice homozygous for the rd8 mutation. A–F are stained with anti-β-catenin. A, D: Retinal specimen from rd8 free wild-type control mouse (Wt) at 9 months of age. B, E: Retinal specimen from a 5-month-old late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) mouse lacking the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5). C, F: Retinal specimen from a 12-month-old L-ORD mouse homozygous for the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5). Continuous staining is observed across the ELM in all genotypes. The arrows indicate the ELM. Magnification bar=4 μm. ELM, external limiting membrane, ONL, outer nuclear layer, INL, internal nuclear layer.
Continuous ELM staining with anti-adherence junction marker in L-ORD mice homozygous for the rd8 mutation. A–F are stained with anti-β-catenin. A, D: Retinal specimen from rd8 free wild-type control mouse (Wt) at 9 months of age. B, E: Retinal specimen from a 5-month-old late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) mouse lacking the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5). C, F: Retinal specimen from a 12-month-old L-ORD mouse homozygous for the rd8 mutation (Ctrp5). Continuous staining is observed across the ELM in all genotypes. The arrows indicate the ELM. Magnification bar=4 μm. ELM, external limiting membrane, ONL, outer nuclear layer, INL, internal nuclear layer.
Analysis of previously published Ctrp5+/− mice and WT controls for the rd8 genotype and phenotype
Systematic analysis of the Ctrp5+/− mice and their littermate controls was previously described by Chavali et al. [20]. Recent analysis of the tail DNA of the mice reported in Chavali et al. [20] for the Crb1 mutation revealed that the WT and Ctrp5+/− mice presented in that study had the rd8 genotype either in the heterozygous or homozygous state (Table 2). A review of retinal morphology of these mice presented in that publication revealed a lack of the characteristic features of rd8 pathology in the Ctrp5+/− mice and the WT littermate controls up to 21 months [20]. Specifically, pseudorosettes were absent, and morphological changes suggestive of abnormal ELM were not observed. Ultrastructure analysis showed no abnormalities in the retina of the littermate control mice carrying the rd8 mutation up to 21 months (Table 2) [20]. The retinal ultrastructure of the Ctrp5+/− mice also had no apparent pathology until 5 months of age. However, in mice older than 12 months, the IS of the rods and cones were mildly swollen.
Table 2
Analysis of mice with L-ORD phenotype presented in Chavali et al. 2011.
Age (month)
Genotype (n=3)
Figures (Chavali et al. 2011)
Phenotype
Pseudo rosettes
Ocular lesion
Autofluorescent spots throughout retina
Number of cones
5
Wt rd8/rd8
7A,9A
Absent
Absent
Absent
>200
Ctrp5+/−;rd8/rd8
7B,9B,9C
Absent
Absent
Absent
>200
8
WtND
6A,6B,7C,9D
Absent
Absent
Absent
>200
Ctrp5+/−;rd8/rd8
6A,6B,7D,9E, 9F
absent
Absent
3±1
>200
12
WtND
6A,6B,7E,9G,11
Absent
Absent
Absent
>200
Ctrp5+/−;rd8/rd8
6A,6B,7F,9H,9I,11
Absent
Absent
56±7
183±7
15
Wt wt/rd8
6A,6B,7G,9J,11
Absent
Absent
15±5
>200
Ctrp5+/−;wt/rd8
6A,6B,7H,9K,9L,11
Absent
Absent
80±10
108±7
21
WtND
6A,6B,7I,9M,11
Absent
Absent
25±4
>200
Ctrp5+/−;wt/rd8
6A,6B,7J,9N,9O,11
Absent
Absent
>200
15±5
ND: not determined n=number of animals per assessment
ND: not determined n=number of animals per assessment
Discussion
Analysis of our L-ORD mouse colony on a C57BL/6J background revealed the presence of the rd8 mutation [20]. In contrast to the findings reported in the original rd8 strain [5], Wt, Wt and Ctrp5+/−;
/ mice in our L-ORD mouse colony failed to exhibit the abnormal ocular pathology associated with the rd8 mutation up to 21 months of age, the longest time point presented in this study. In addition, the Ctrp5+/− mice free of the rd8 mutation developed the characteristic L-ORD-associated pathology.The rd8 mice were reported to develop AF lesions that were detected as early as 3 weeks of age [5]. These lesions were large, irregular, and heavily concentrated in the inferior nasal quadrant of the fundus. Clinically, these lesions correspond to the region with retinal folds and pseudorosettes that involve the photoreceptors [29]. The laminar folds and pseudorosettes in rd8 mice were visualized between the ONL and the INL. Morphologically, they represent displacement of the IS/OS material and the photoreceptor cell bodies into the inner retina due to the incomplete formation of the ELM and loss of the structural barrier [29]. The photoreceptor IS lose their orderly arrangement, and by 4 weeks of age, 25% of photoreceptors are short in the rd8 mice when compared to WT mice [5]. A significant thinning of the IS and OS in the region with dysplasia was reported in rd8 mice by 4 weeks of age. By 10 weeks, photoreceptor OS in rd8 mice start to fragment resulting in the accumulation of granular debris in the sub-retinal space [5].In contrast to the findings in the original colony of rd8 mice, the Wt and Ctrp5+/−;
/ mice in our L-ORD mouse colony did not show pseudorosette pathology even at 21 months of age, the oldest age tested in this study. The histology of the mice in the L-ORD colony was devoid of the characteristic features of the rd8 phenotype. The Wt and Ctrp5/ mice showed well-defined nuclear layers (the INL and the ONL). The characteristic retinal changes that are prominent in rd8 mice as early as 4 weeks were not observed in either the Wt or Ctrp5-;
/ mice in our colony of L-ORD mice at least up to age 21 months.The L-ORD mouse model develops AF lesions around 12 months with a subsequent progressive increase in the number of these lesions with age [20]. Contrary to the large number of AF lesions detected in Ctrp5mice at older ages, a minimal number of spots were observed in the age-matched Wt mice. Although AF lesions in 21-month-old Ctrp5 were distributed throughout the retina, the ocular spots observed in the rd8 model were larger, heavily concentrated in the inferior quadrant of the fundus, and developed as early as 3 weeks of age. The rd8 mice backcrossed onto the C57BL/6 background were reported to have a discontinuous ELM phenotype [5]. In contrast, the Wt and Ctrp5+/−; mice raised on the C57BL/6J background exhibited an uninterrupted outer limiting membrane. These observations indicate that the presence of the Crb1 mutation in either the homozygous or heterozygous state failed to result in the development of the characteristic rd8 phenotype in the Wt and Ctrp5/-;
/ mice in our L-ORD mouse colony. A review of retinal morphology and analysis of the genotype of previously published L-ORD mice and wild-type controls revealed the absence of the rd8-associated phenotype at least up to 21 months [20].In contrast to the findings in the L-ORD mice, the retinal pathology in the rd8 model is clearly evident by 4 weeks with shortening and swelling of the IS and OS in rd8 mice [5]. Abnormalities in the laminar architecture and retinal degeneration were also noted [5,29]. However, abnormal drusen-like, basal laminar, and basal linear deposits similar to those observed in the L-ORD mouse model were not reported in rd8 mice [20]. The inferior retina of the rd8 mouseis more severely affected with prominent dysplasia than the superior retina. These abnormalities were absent in the L-ORD mice even at 21 months [20]. These observations indicate that the presence of the Crb1 mutation either in the heterozygous state or homozygous state did not result in the development of the rd8 characteristic phenotype in the Ctrp5mice in our L-ORD mouse colony.The absence of the rd8 retinal phenotype was noted not only in Ctrp5+/−;
/ mice but also in the littermate Wt mice. This is consistent with the findings reported by Mehalow et al. for C57BL/6J mice [5]. In that study, a significant proportion of mice with a homozygous Crb1 mutation on the C57BL/6J background did not exhibit rd8-associated retinal pathology, including ocular spots, retinal folds, pseudorosettes, inner segment shortening, and disorganization [5]. A more recent study by Luhman et al. reported that the homozygous rd8 mutation on the C57BL/6 background leads to an increase in evenly distributed small discrete autofluorescent lesions on SLO fundus images [18].It was hypothesized that the retinal abnormalities due to the Crb1 mutation are strongly modulated by a genetic variant expressed in C57BL/6J mice [5]. Supporting this hypothesis, Luhmann et al. showed that an autosomal recessive locus in C57BL/6 can modulate the rd8 phenotype in mice homozygous for the Crb1 mutation [18,19]. The ES cells used to develop our L-ORD mice were a mixed population obtained from mice with C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N backgrounds. Subsequently, our L-ORD mice were bred with the C57BL/6J strain to maintain the mice line. It is likely that the modifier allele in the C57BL/6J strain is responsible for the absence of the rd8 phenotype in our L-ORD mouse model colony.The clinical phenotype of Ctrp5 and Ctrp5miceis similar with characteristic late-onset sub-RPE deposits and Bruch’s membrane abnormalities including basal laminar and basal linear deposits. This pathology is consistent with the phenotype observed in patients with L-ORD, while the retinal phenotype of age-matched Wt and Wt mice was normal. These observations clearly show that the presence of the Crb1 mutation did not result in the development of retinal abnormalities in either Ctrp5 or littermate Wt mice. In addition, these data demonstrate that the S163R mutation in Ctrp5 in the heterozygous state leads to the development of the L-ORD phenotype and that the presence of Crb1 mutation did not alter the retinal phenotype in these mice. It is likely that the presence of the Crb1 mutation in addition to the Ctrp5 mutation may result in additional changes that were not investigated in this study.The autofluorescent spots reported by Luhman et al. in C57BL/6 mice with the Crb1 mutation are similar to the AF lesions observed in Ctrp5mice [18]. It is possible that the AF lesions observed in rd8, rd6, Ctrp5, and chemokine-deficient mice with diverse genetic abnormalities may have a similar origin, and studying the pathobiology of these lesions may provide better understanding of the mechanism underlying RD.Although this L-ORD mouse model (Ctrp5) generated on the C57BL/6J background developed late-onset retinal pathology, another knock-in model with the Ctrp5S163R mutation generated on the 129SV background (Ctrp5+/−-129) did not develop retinal pathology even when older [30]. Shu et al. speculated that the genetic background may also influence the development of L-ORD pathology in mice [20,30]. Our current studies further support this hypothesis, and the identification of the underlying cause of variation in the phenotype between these two mouse models is likely to assist in understanding the molecular pathology of L-ORD and the development of therapeutic interventions to treat this condition.
Authors: A I den Hollander; J R Heckenlively; L I van den Born; Y J de Kok; S D van der Velde-Visser; U Kellner; B Jurklies; M J van Schooneveld; A Blankenagel; K Rohrschneider; B Wissinger; J R Cruysberg; A F Deutman; H G Brunner; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; C B Hoyng; F P Cremers Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-05-24 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: S Bernal; M Calaf; M Garcia-Hoyos; B Garcia-Sandoval; J Rosell; A Adan; C Ayuso; M Baiget Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: A J Lotery; S G Jacobson; G A Fishman; R G Weleber; A B Fulton; P Namperumalsamy; E Héon; A V Levin; S Grover; J R Rosenow; K K Kopp; V C Sheffield; E M Stone Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2001-03
Authors: A I den Hollander; K Johnson; Y J de Kok; A Klebes; H G Brunner; E Knust; F P Cremers Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Samuel G Jacobson; Artur V Cideciyan; Tomas S Aleman; Michael J Pianta; Alexander Sumaroka; Sharon B Schwartz; Elaine E Smilko; Ann H Milam; Val C Sheffield; Edwin M Stone Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Adrienne K Mehalow; Shuhei Kameya; Richard S Smith; Norman L Hawes; James M Denegre; James A Young; Lesley Bechtold; Neena B Haider; Ulrich Tepass; John R Heckenlively; Bo Chang; Jürgen K Naggert; Patsy M Nishina Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Anneke I den Hollander; Michela Ghiani; Yvette J M de Kok; Jan Wijnholds; Andrea Ballabio; Frans P M Cremers; Vania Broccoli Journal: Mech Dev Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 1.882
Authors: Ulrich F O Luhmann; Livia S Carvalho; Sophia-Martha Kleine Holthaus; Jill A Cowing; Simon Greenaway; Colin J Chu; Philipp Herrmann; Alexander J Smith; Peter M G Munro; Paul Potter; James W B Bainbridge; Robin R Ali Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Bret A Moore; Michel J Roux; Lionel Sebbag; Ann Cooper; Sydney G Edwards; Brian C Leonard; Denise M Imai; Stephen Griffey; Lynette Bower; Dave Clary; K C Kent Lloyd; Yann Hérault; Sara M Thomasy; Christopher J Murphy; Ala Moshiri Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Shyamtanu Datta; Marian Renwick; Viet Q Chau; Fang Zhang; Emily R Nettesheim; Daniel M Lipinski; John D Hulleman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Hui Peng; Viet Q Chau; Wanida Phetsang; Rebecca M Sebastian; M Rhia L Stone; Shyamtanu Datta; Marian Renwick; Yusuf T Tamer; Erdal Toprak; Andrew Y Koh; Mark A T Blaskovich; John D Hulleman Journal: Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 6.698
Authors: Hui Peng; Prerana Ramadurgum; DaNae R Woodard; Steffi Daniel; Emi Nakahara; Marian Renwick; Bogale Aredo; Shyamtanu Datta; Bo Chen; Rafael Ufret-Vincenty; John D Hulleman Journal: iScience Date: 2022-04-06