BACKGROUND: Correct technique and patient acceptance of inhalation devices for lung disease influence successful long-term management. Patient ability to use the proper technique may differ depending on the device as well as patient factors. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of our study are to measure self-reported level of acceptability of inhaler devices in community settings and compare correct use of inhaler devices using a novel scale for measuring appropriate inhaler technique. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patients from 3 different practice sites with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who were using an inhaler device. In addition to describing the samples' overall acceptability and correct use scores for the different inhalers, acceptability and correct use scores were compared based on patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients completed the study. The results show that acceptability was lowest for the pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with a spacer (S); effective use was best demonstrated with pMDI and poorest with pMDI-S. Older patients were found to be more accepting of the HandiHaler device than younger patients. Patients reporting taking more inhaled drugs were found to be more accepting of the pMDI-S than those taking fewer drugs. Finally, patients reporting taking more inhaled drugs demonstrated less-effective use of the HandiHaler device than patients taking fewer drugs. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary disease duration does not ensure improved use for all inhalers; patients taking more drugs demonstrate less-effective use for some devices. Assessment of patient acceptance and factors that predict the ability to use a device should be considered to individualize therapy.
BACKGROUND: Correct technique and patient acceptance of inhalation devices for lung disease influence successful long-term management. Patient ability to use the proper technique may differ depending on the device as well as patient factors. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of our study are to measure self-reported level of acceptability of inhaler devices in community settings and compare correct use of inhaler devices using a novel scale for measuring appropriate inhaler technique. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patients from 3 different practice sites with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who were using an inhaler device. In addition to describing the samples' overall acceptability and correct use scores for the different inhalers, acceptability and correct use scores were compared based on patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients completed the study. The results show that acceptability was lowest for the pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with a spacer (S); effective use was best demonstrated with pMDI and poorest with pMDI-S. Older patients were found to be more accepting of the HandiHaler device than younger patients. Patients reporting taking more inhaled drugs were found to be more accepting of the pMDI-S than those taking fewer drugs. Finally, patients reporting taking more inhaled drugs demonstrated less-effective use of the HandiHaler device than patients taking fewer drugs. CONCLUSION:Pulmonary disease duration does not ensure improved use for all inhalers; patients taking more drugs demonstrate less-effective use for some devices. Assessment of patient acceptance and factors that predict the ability to use a device should be considered to individualize therapy.
Authors: Karin Lisspers; Pedro Teixeira; Coert Blom; Janwillem Kocks; Björn Ställberg; David Price; Niels Chavannes Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Lia Jahedi; Sue R Downie; Bandana Saini; Hak-Kim Chan; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich Journal: J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 2.849