RATIONALE: The contribution of two major endocannabinoids, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA), in the regulation of fear expression is still unknown. OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the role of different players of the endocannabinoid system on the expression of a strong auditory-cued fear memory in male mice by pharmacological means. RESULTS: The cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) antagonist SR141716 (3 mg/kg) caused an increase in conditioned freezing upon repeated tone presentation on three consecutive days. The cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) antagonist AM630 (3 mg/kg), in contrast, had opposite effects during the first tone presentation, with no effects of the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor type 1 (TRPV1) antagonist SB366791 (1 and 3 mg/kg). Administration of the CB2 agonist JWH133 (3 mg/kg) failed to affect the acute freezing response, whereas the CB1 agonist CP55,940 (50 μg/kg) augmented it. The endocannabinoid uptake inhibitor AM404 (3 mg/kg), but not VDM11 (3 mg/kg), reduced the acute freezing response. Its co-administration with SR141716 or SB366791 confirmed an involvement of CB1 and TRPV1. AEA degradation inhibition by URB597 (1 mg/kg) decreased, while 2-AG degradation inhibition by JZL184 (4 and 8 mg/kg) increased freezing response. As revealed in conditional CB1-deficient mutants, CB1 on cortical glutamatergic neurons alleviates whereas CB1 on GABAergic neurons slightly enhances fear expression. Moreover, 2-AG fear-promoting effects depended on CB1 signaling in GABAergic neurons, while an involvement of glutamatergic neurons remained inconclusive due to the high freezing shown by vehicle-treated Glu-CB1-KO. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that increased AEA levels mediate acute fear relief, whereas increased 2-AG levels promote the expression of conditioned fear primarily via CB1 on GABAergic neurons.
RATIONALE: The contribution of two major endocannabinoids, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA), in the regulation of fear expression is still unknown. OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the role of different players of the endocannabinoid system on the expression of a strong auditory-cued fear memory in male mice by pharmacological means. RESULTS: The cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) antagonist SR141716 (3 mg/kg) caused an increase in conditioned freezing upon repeated tone presentation on three consecutive days. The cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) antagonist AM630 (3 mg/kg), in contrast, had opposite effects during the first tone presentation, with no effects of the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor type 1 (TRPV1) antagonist SB366791 (1 and 3 mg/kg). Administration of the CB2 agonist JWH133 (3 mg/kg) failed to affect the acute freezing response, whereas the CB1 agonist CP55,940 (50 μg/kg) augmented it. The endocannabinoid uptake inhibitor AM404 (3 mg/kg), but not VDM11 (3 mg/kg), reduced the acute freezing response. Its co-administration with SR141716 or SB366791 confirmed an involvement of CB1 and TRPV1. AEA degradation inhibition by URB597 (1 mg/kg) decreased, while 2-AG degradation inhibition by JZL184 (4 and 8 mg/kg) increased freezing response. As revealed in conditional CB1-deficient mutants, CB1 on cortical glutamatergic neurons alleviates whereas CB1 on GABAergic neurons slightly enhances fear expression. Moreover, 2-AG fear-promoting effects depended on CB1 signaling in GABAergic neurons, while an involvement of glutamatergic neurons remained inconclusive due to the high freezing shown by vehicle-treated Glu-CB1-KO. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that increased AEA levels mediate acute fear relief, whereas increased 2-AG levels promote the expression of conditioned fear primarily via CB1 on GABAergic neurons.
Authors: Bin Pan; Wei Wang; Peng Zhong; Jacqueline L Blankman; Benjamin F Cravatt; Qing-song Liu Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Steven G Kinsey; Scott T O'Neal; Jonathan Z Long; Benjamin F Cravatt; Aron H Lichtman Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Jin Fu; Giovanni Bottegoni; Oscar Sasso; Rosalia Bertorelli; Walter Rocchia; Matteo Masetti; Ana Guijarro; Alessio Lodola; Andrea Armirotti; Gianpiero Garau; Tiziano Bandiera; Angelo Reggiani; Marco Mor; Andrea Cavalli; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2011-11-20 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Maria Morena; Robert J Aukema; Kira D Leitl; Asim J Rashid; Haley A Vecchiarelli; Sheena A Josselyn; Matthew N Hill Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Farhana Yasmin; Roberto Colangeli; Maria Morena; Sarah Filipski; Mario van der Stelt; Quentin J Pittman; Cecilia J Hillard; G Campbell Teskey; Bruce S McEwen; Matthew N Hill; Sumantra Chattarji Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin A Sticht; David J Lau; Catherine M Keenan; Jean-Baptiste Cavin; Maria Morena; Venkata Kiran Vemuri; Alexandros Makriyannis; Benjamin F Cravatt; Keith A Sharkey; Matthew N Hill Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Sachin Patel; Mathew N Hill; Joseph F Cheer; Carsten T Wotjak; Andrew Holmes Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 8.989