Literature DB >> 25813867

Defining the Role of the Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove and Tibial Tubercle-Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distances in the Work-up of Patients With Patellofemoral Disorders.

Cameron Michael Anley1, Guy Vernon Morris2, Adnan Saithna2, Steven Laurence James3, Martyn Snow2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The radiological work-up of patients with patellofemoral disorders continues to be debated. The interchangeability of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently been questioned. In addition, a new measurement-the tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance-has shown that not all patients with a pathological TT-TG distance (>20 mm) have lateralization of the tibial tubercle. Another factor to consider when looking at the position of the tibial tubercle is the knee joint rotation, defined as the angle between the femoral dorsal condylar line and the tibial dorsal condylar line.
PURPOSE: To determine, with a larger population, if the TT-TG measurements can be used interchangeably between CT and MRI and to confirm the correlation between the TT-PCL and TT-TG distances in determining tibial tubercle lateralization. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Patients with patellofemoral disorders and MRI and CT scans of the same knee (n = 141) were identified. The TT-PCL, the knee joint rotation, and TT-TG were measured independently by 2 fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Thirty measurements were repeated on a separate occasion to allow for an assessment of the intrarater reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess reliability of the measurements.
RESULTS: The mean TT-TG was 4.16 mm less on MRI (P < .05), with the mean TT-TG ± SD being 17.72 ± 5.15 mm on CT (range, 6.97-31.33 mm) and 13.56 ± 6.07 mm on MRI (range, 2-30.04 mm). The ICC for each rater comparing the 2 imaging modalities was only fair (0.54 and 0.48). The mean TT-PCL measurement was 20.32 ± 3.45 mm (range, 10.11-32.01 mm) with excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability (>0.75). Based on the TT-TG and TT-PCL measurements, 4 groups of patients can be established. When knee joint rotation is compared among groups, an increased TT-TG may result from true lateralization of the tibial tubercle, an increased knee joint rotation, or both.
CONCLUSION: Based on a statistically significant mean difference (4.11 mm) and only a fair ICC (0.54 and 0.48) for raters comparing the 2 modalities, the measurements for the TT-TG cannot be used interchangeably between CT and MRI. Therefore, currently accepted values for TT-TG based on CT scans should not be applied to an MRI scan. The TT-PCL measurement is a measure of true lateralization of the tibial tubercle, while the TT-TG is an amalgamated measure of true lateralization and knee joint rotation.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; knee; magnetic resonance imaging; tibial tubercle–posterior cruciate ligament; tibial tubercle–trochlear groove

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25813867     DOI: 10.1177/0363546515576128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  20 in total

Review 1.  Use of TT-PCL versus TT-TG.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Brady; Adam S Rosencrans; Beth E Shubin Stein
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

2.  Current evidence advocates use of a new pathologic tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance threshold in patients with patellar instability.

Authors:  Nickolas Boutris; Domenica A Delgado; John S Labis; Patrick C McCulloch; David M Lintner; Joshua D Harris
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Avoiding Complications with MPFL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Marvin K Smith; Brian C Werner; David R Diduch
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

4.  Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance Is a Reliable and Accurate Indicator of Patellofemoral Instability.

Authors:  Giampietro L Vairo; Joaquin Moya-Angeler; Michael A Siorta; Ashley H Anderson; Paul S Sherbondy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance Is Greater in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: Implications for the Origin of Pain and Clinical Interventions.

Authors:  Victor R Carlson; Barry P Boden; Aricia Shen; Jennifer N Jackson; Lawrence Yao; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The Increased Tibiofemoral Rotation: A Potential Contributing Factor for Patellar Maltracking in Patients with Recurrent Patellar Dislocation.

Authors:  Guan Wu; YanWei Cao; GuanYang Song; Yue Li; Tong Zheng; Hui Zhang; ZhiJun Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Dynamic tracking influenced by anatomy following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: Computational simulation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Kerwyn C Jones; S Cyrus Rezvanifar; Joseph N Gabra; Melanie A Morscher; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Comparison of a Novel Weightbearing Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner Versus a Conventional Computed Tomography Scanner for Measuring Patellar Instability.

Authors:  John Marzo; Melissa Kluczynski; Anthony Notino; Leslie Bisson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-07

9.  Osteotomy of the Tibial Tubercle for Anteromedialization.

Authors:  Márcio B Ferrari; George Sanchez; Nicholas I Kennedy; Anthony Sanchez; Katrina Schantz; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-08-21

10.  Current Concepts in the Management of Patellar Instability.

Authors:  Michael S Laidlaw; David R Diduch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.