Literature DB >> 25813760

The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact.

Gianmarco Crocetta1, Simone Piantini2, Marco Pierini2, Ciaran Simms3.   

Abstract

Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s. Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head-ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head-ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head-ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bonnet leading edge height; Ground impact; Ground impact mechanism; Head–ground impact speed; Vehicle–pedestrian collision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25813760     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  5 in total

1.  Reduction of pedestrian death rates: a missed global target.

Authors:  Yasin J Yasin; Michal Grivna; Fikri M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.

Authors:  Katherine Evans; Nelson de Moura; Stéphane Chauvier; Raja Chatila; Ebru Dogan
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  An Investigation of Dynamic Responses and Head Injuries of Standing Subway Passengers during Collisions.

Authors:  Yong Peng; Tuo Xu; Lin Hou; Chaojie Fan; Wei Zhou
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-09-02       Impact factor: 1.781

4.  A Computational Biomechanics Human Body Model Coupling Finite Element and Multibody Segments for Assessment of Head/Brain Injuries in Car-To-Pedestrian Collisions.

Authors:  Chao Yu; Fang Wang; Bingyu Wang; Guibing Li; Fan Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Analysis of craniocerebral injury in facial collision accidents.

Authors:  Jie Tian; Chuntao Zhang; Qun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.