Literature DB >> 25813746

Cognitive bias, hand preference and welfare of common marmosets.

Dianne J Gordon1, Lesley J Rogers2.   

Abstract

Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) have hand preferences for grasping pieces of food and holding them while eating and these are stable throughout adult life. We report here that left-handed marmosets have negative cognitive bias compared to right-handed marmosets. Twelve marmosets were trained to expect a food reward from a bowl with a black lid and not from one with a white lid, or vice versa. In probe tests with ambiguous, grey-lidded bowls a left-handed group (N=7) were less likely to remove the lid to inspect the bowl than a right-handed group (N=5). This difference between left- and right-handed marmosets was not dependent on rate of learning, sex or age. In fact, hand-preference was not associated with rate of learning the task. Furthermore, retrospective examination of colony records of 39 marmosets revealed that more aggression was directed towards left- than right-handed marmosets. Hence, hand preference, which can be measured easily, could serve as an indicator of cognitive bias and may signal a need for particular care in laboratory environments. We explain the results by arguing that hand preference reflects more frequent (or dominant) use of the opposite hemisphere and this predisposes individuals to behave differently.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambiguous stimulus; Cognitive bias; Common marmoset; Hand preference; Hemispheric dominance; Welfare

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25813746     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?

Authors:  S Henry; C Fureix; R Rowberry; M Bateson; M Hausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-01-12

2.  Does owner handedness influence paw preference in dogs?

Authors:  Kimberley Charlton; Elisa Frasnelli
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Performance on inhibitory tasks does not relate to handedness in several small groups of Callitrichids.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Yunchao Luo; Hongwei Lin; Nuo Xu; Yiru Gu; Haixia Bu; Yali Bai; Zhongqiu Li
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.899

4.  Baseline cortisol levels and social behavior differ as a function of handedness in marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Emma Vaughan; Annie Le; Michaela Casey; Kathryn P Workman; Agnès Lacreuse
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.014

5.  Judgement bias in pigs is independent of performance in a spatial holeboard task and conditional discrimination learning.

Authors:  Sanne Roelofs; Eimear Murphy; Haifang Ni; Elise Gieling; Rebecca E Nordquist; F Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  Cognitive Bias in Zoo Animals: An Optimistic Outlook for Welfare Assessment.

Authors:  Isabella L K Clegg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Does opportunistic testing bias cognitive performance in primates? Learning from drop-outs.

Authors:  Michèle N Schubiger; Alexandra Kissling; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Laterality as a Tool for Assessing Breed Differences in Emotional Reactivity in the Domestic Cat, Felis silvestris catus.

Authors:  Deborah L Wells; Louise J McDowell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Making Decisions under Ambiguity: Judgment Bias Tasks for Assessing Emotional State in Animals.

Authors:  Sanne Roelofs; Hetty Boleij; Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Happy hamsters? Enrichment induces positive judgement bias for mildly (but not truly) ambiguous cues to reward and punishment in Mesocricetus auratus.

Authors:  Emily J Bethell; Nicola F Koyama
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.