Literature DB >> 25813738

Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.

Takehiro Minamoto1, Zach Shipstead, Naoyuki Osaka, Randall W Engle.   

Abstract

Studies on visual cognitive load have reported inconsistent effects of distractor interference when distractors have visual characteristic that are similar to the cognitive load. Some studies have shown that the cognitive load enhances distractor interference, while others reported an attenuating effect. We attribute these inconsistencies to the amount of cognitive load that a person is required to maintain. Lower amounts of cognitive load increase distractor interference by orienting attention toward visually similar distractors. Higher amounts of cognitive load attenuate distractor interference by depleting attentional resources needed to process distractors. In the present study, cognitive load consisted of faces (Experiments 1-3) or scenes (Experiment 2). Participants performed a selective attention task in which they ignored face distractors while judging a color of a target dot presented nearby, under differing amounts of load. Across these experiments distractor interference was greater in the low-load condition and smaller in the high-load condition when the content of the cognitive load had similar visual characteristic to the distractors. We also found that when a series of judgments needed to be made, the effect was apparent for the first trial but not for the second. We further tested an involvement of working memory capacity (WMC) in the load effect (Experiment 3). Interestingly, both high and low WMC groups received an equivalent effect of the cognitive load in the first distractor, suggesting these effects are fairly automatic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25813738     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0866-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  4 in total

1.  Chunking improves symbolic sequence processing and relies on working memory gating mechanisms.

Authors:  Oleg Solopchuk; Andrea Alamia; Etienne Olivier; Alexandre Zénon
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Cognitions about bodily purity attenuate stress perception.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar; Sarah Cames
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Expectancy-Based Strategic Processes Are Influenced by Spatial Working Memory Load and Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Juan J Ortells; Jan W De Fockert; Nazaret Romera; Sergio Fernández
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-17

4.  Increased associative interference under high cognitive load.

Authors:  Shira Baror; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.