Literature DB >> 25813730

Cream skimming and hospital transfers in a mixed public-private system.

Terence C Cheng1, John P Haisken-DeNew2, Jongsay Yong2.   

Abstract

The increasing prominence of the private sector in health care provision has generated considerable interest in understanding its implications on quality and cost. This paper investigates the phenomenon of cream skimming in a mixed public-private hospital setting using the novel approach of analysing hospital transfers. We analyse hospital administrative data of patients with ischemic heart disease from the state of Victoria, Australia. The data set contains approximately 1.77 million admission episodes in 309 hospitals, of which 132 are public hospitals, and 177 private hospitals. We ask if patients transferred between public and private hospitals differ systematically in the severity and complexity of their medical conditions; and if so, whether utilisation also differs. We find that patients with higher disease severity are more likely to be transferred from private to public hospitals whereas the opposite is true for patients transferred to private hospitals. We also find that patients transferred from private to public hospitals stayed longer and cost more than private-to-private transfer patients, after controlling for patients' observed health conditions and personal characteristics. Overall, the evidence is suggestive of the presence of cream skimming in the Victorian hospital system, although we cannot conclusively rule out other mechanisms that might influence hospital transfers.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Cream skimming; Hospital transfers; Hospital utilisation; Mixed public-private system

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25813730     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  8 in total

1.  Analytical methods to assess the impacts of activity-based funding (ABF): a scoping review.

Authors:  Gintare Valentelyte; Conor Keegan; Jan Sorensen
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2021-05-18

2.  Data mining application to healthcare fraud detection: a two-step unsupervised clustering method for outlier detection with administrative databases.

Authors:  Michela Carlotta Massi; Francesca Ieva; Emanuele Lettieri
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  From public vs. private to public/private mix in healthcare: lessons from the Israeli and the Spanish cases.

Authors:  Dani Filc; Alon Rasooly; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2020-06-24

4.  Coverage of cancer services in Australia and providers' views on service gaps: findings from a national cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Jennifer Hunter; Caroline Smith; Geoff P Delaney; Kate Templeman; Suzanne Grant; Jane M Ussher
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Insurance Coverage Predicts Mortality in Patients Transferred Between Hospitals: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Michael G Usher; Christine Fanning; Vivian W Fang; Madeline Carroll; Amay Parikh; Anne Joseph; Dana Herrigel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data.

Authors:  David Isaksson; Paula Blomqvist; Ronnie Pingel; Ulrika Winblad
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Commentary: The Consequences of Private Involvement in Healthcare - The Australian Experience.

Authors:  Stephen Duckett
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-05

8.  Quantifying the Costs to Different Funders over Five-Years for Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer in Queensland, Australia: A Data Linkage Study.

Authors:  Daniel Lindsay; Emily Callander
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.