Literature DB >> 25813641

Assessment of total bacterial cells in extended aeration activated sludge plants using flow cytometry as a microbial monitoring tool.

Tarik Abzazou1, Humbert Salvadó, Carmina Bruguera-Casamada, Pedro Simón, Carlos Lardín, Rosa M Araujo.   

Abstract

The extended aeration activated sludge (EAAS) process is one of the most applied biological processes in small towns. Here, we study the abundance and viability of total bacterial cells in two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) operating with an EAAS process. We use flow cytometry (FCM) combined with SYTO13 and propidium iodide (PI) dyes as a rapid, easy, reliable and accurate microbial monitoring tool. A disaggregation procedure with an ultrasonic bath was designed to detach total bacterial cells from activated sludge flocs for subsequent FCM analysis. This procedure permitted the recovery of total bacterial cells from sludge flocs without affecting bacterial viability, as indicated by bacterial strain controls. Since FCM is a multi-parameter technique, it was possible to determine total bacterial abundance and their viability in the activated sludge. As a comparative method, epifluorescence microscopy was also used to quantify total bacterial cells; both methods produced similar results. The FCM analysis revealed relative microbial stability in both the WWTPs. The total bacterial abundance quantified by FCM in the two plants studied was 1.02-6.23 × 10(11) cells L(-1) with 70-72% viability, one logarithm less than that reported in the literature for WWTPs using the conventional activated sludge process. This can be explained by the difference in the operational parameters between the conventional plant and EAAS, mainly the organic loading rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25813641     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4372-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  18 in total

1.  Assessment of activated sludge viability with flow cytometry.

Authors:  Giuliano Ziglio; Gianni Andreottola; Silvia Barbesti; Giorgio Boschetti; Laura Bruni; Paola Foladori; Roberta Villa
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Resolution of viable and membrane-compromised bacteria in freshwater and marine waters based on analytical flow cytometry and nucleic acid double staining.

Authors:  G Grégori; S Citterio; A Ghiani; M Labra; S Sgorbati; S Brown; M Denis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Simultaneous fluorescent gram staining and activity assessment of activated sludge bacteria.

Authors:  Scott Forster; Jason R Snape; Hilary M Lappin-Scott; Jonathan Porter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bacteria permeabilization and disruption caused by sludge reduction technologies evaluated by flow cytometry.

Authors:  P Foladori; S Tamburini; L Bruni
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Direct quantification of bacterial biomass in influent, effluent and activated sludge of wastewater treatment plants by using flow cytometry.

Authors:  P Foladori; L Bruni; S Tamburini; G Ziglio
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Monitoring a widespread bacterial group: in situ detection of planctomycetes with 16S rRNA-targeted probes.

Authors:  Alexander Neef; Rudolf Amann; Heinz Schlesner; Karl-Heinz Schleifer
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Effects of sonication on bacteria viability in wastewater treatment plants evaluated by flow cytometry--fecal indicators, wastewater and activated sludge.

Authors:  Paola Foladori; Bruni Laura; Andreottola Gianni; Ziglio Giuliano
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 8.  Use of fluorochromes for direct enumeration of total bacteria in environmental samples: past and present.

Authors:  R L Kepner; J R Pratt
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-12

9.  Comparison of disruption procedures for enumeration of activated sludge floc bacteria by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Tania Falcioni; Anita Manti; Paola Boi; Barbara Canonico; Maria Balsamo; Stefano Papa
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.058

10.  Probing activated sludge with oligonucleotides specific for proteobacteria: inadequacy of culture-dependent methods for describing microbial community structure.

Authors:  M Wagner; R Amann; H Lemmer; K H Schleifer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  5 in total

1.  Flow cytometric characterization of bacterial abundance and physiological status in a nitrifying-denitrifying activated sludge system treating landfill leachate.

Authors:  Sergio Collado; Paula Oulego; Saúl Alonso; Mario Díaz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Soil bacterial quantification approaches coupling with relative abundances reflecting the changes of taxa.

Authors:  Zhaojing Zhang; Yuanyuan Qu; Shuzhen Li; Kai Feng; Shang Wang; Weiwei Cai; Yuting Liang; Hui Li; Meiying Xu; Huaqun Yin; Ye Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Strategies to Optimize Microalgae Conversion to Biogas: Co-Digestion, Pretreatment and Hydraulic Retention Time.

Authors:  Maria Solé-Bundó; Humbert Salvadó; Fabiana Passos; Marianna Garfí; Ivet Ferrer
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Revisiting soil bacterial counting methods: Optimal soil storage and pretreatment methods and comparison of culture-dependent and -independent methods.

Authors:  Jeonggil Lee; Han-Suk Kim; Ho Young Jo; Man Jae Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of micro-aerobic process on improvement of anaerobic digestion sewage sludge treatment: flow cytometry and ATP assessment.

Authors:  Reza Barati Rashvanlou; Abbas Rezaee; Mahdi Farzadkia; Mitra Gholami; Majid Kermani
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.036

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.