Literature DB >> 25812808

Halogenated flame-retardant concentrations in settled dust, respirable and inhalable particulates and polyurethane foam at gymnastic training facilities and residences.

Mark J La Guardia1, Robert C Hale2.   

Abstract

Halogenated flame-retardants (FRs) are used in a wide array of polymer-containing products. Animal studies and structure-activity modeling exercises suggest that FR exposure may result in detrimental toxicological effects. Workers with extended contact with such polymers (e.g., electronic dismantlers, carpet installers and aircraft personnel) have previously been observed to exhibit elevated body burdens of FRs, e.g., polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). Recently, elevated PBDE blood levels were also reported in a non-occupational exposure group, gymnasts. These levels were hypothesized to be related to the large volumes of FR-treated polyurethane foam in gymnastics facilities. To further our understanding of workers' potential exposure, we analyzed FR concentrations in indoor dust and size-fractionated air particulates (respirable (<4 μm) and inhalable (>4 μm)) from gymnastic studios. Values were compared to samples from the homes of coaches employed at these facilities. Polyurethane foam blocks (i.e., pit foam) were also analyzed to characterize potential FR sources. FRs examined included those used to flame-retard polyurethane foam: 8 PBDE congeners, two brominated components of Firemaster 550 (2-ethylhexyl 2, 3, 4, 5-tetrabromobenzoate (TBB) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) 3, 4, 5, 6-tetrabromophthalate (TBPH)) and three chlorinated organophosphates (tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCPP) and tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP)). Several additional FRs not used in polyurethane were also evaluated. These have also been detected in indoor dust and air and may also lead to adverse health effects. These include: BDE-183 and its replacement product (1, 2-bis(2, 4, 6-tribromophenoxy) ethane (BTBPE), two congeners of the deca-BDE formulation (BDE-206, -209) and their replacement decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE) and hexabromocyclododecane (α-, β-, γ-HBCD), and tetrabromobisphenol-A (TBBPA)). Pit foam contained multiple FRs at cumulative concentrations of 12,100 to 25,800 μg g(-1), or 1.2% to 2.6% by weight. TBB and TBPH were the most abundant FRs detected, followed by TDCPP and several PBDEs. The mean total FR burden detected at the gyms was 8.6-fold higher (574 μg g(-1)) than that observed in the house dust samples (66.8 μg g(-1)). However, the polyurethane additives TBB and TDCPP were the only FRs that exhibited significantly greater levels (P<0.05) in gym than house dust. Mean levels of five FRs (BDE-99, -100, -153, -209 and TDCPP) were also higher in respirable particulates from the gyms than the homes and four FRs (BDE-47, TBB, TBPH and DBDPE) were higher at the homes than the gyms; these differences were not significant (P>0.05). Several additional FRs were detected in inhalable particulates; mean levels of BDE-66, -206 and TCPP were higher in the homes and BDE-47, -85, -99, -100, -153, -209, TBB, TBPH, and TDCPP were higher at the gyms. But, only the polyurethane additives i.e., BDE-100, TBB and TDCPP were significantly greater (P<0.05) in inhalable particulates from the gyms than at the homes. In conclusion, polyurethane foam collected from gymnastic studios exhibited a variety of FR compositional signatures; likely reflective of changes in FR usage over time and by different manufacturers. FR concentrations and compositional signatures also differed between settled dust, respirable and inhalable particulates between the gyms and homes. Concentrations of FRs used in polyurethane foam were higher in gym air and dust compared to homes, particularly TBB and TDCPP - which were also the primary FRs detected in the pit foam samples. Although these results should be interpreted with caution, as the sample size was small, these findings do suggest that FR concentrations observed in dust and air particulates from the gymnastic studios are further evidence that individuals frequenting these environments are at greater risk for exposure to these polymer additives.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dust analysis; Flame retardants; Gymnast; Human exposure; Indoor air quality; Polyurethane

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25812808     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  15 in total

1.  Urinary biomarkers of flame retardant exposure among collegiate U.S. gymnasts.

Authors:  Courtney C Carignan; Mingliang Fang; Heather M Stapleton; Wendy Heiger-Bernays; Michael D McClean; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Assessment of spray polyurethane foam worker exposure to organophosphate flame retardants through measures in air, hand wipes, and urine.

Authors:  Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Jonathan Slone; Alexander C Mayer; Kaitlyn Phillips; John Lu; I-Chen Chen; Annette Christianson; Robert Streicher; Mark J La Guardia; Nayana Jayatilaka; Maria Ospina; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Worker exposure to flame retardants in manufacturing, construction and service industries.

Authors:  Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Jonathan Slone; Alexander Mayer; I-Chen Chen; Mark J La Guardia
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Concentrations and loadings of organophosphate and replacement brominated flame retardants in house dust from the home study during the PBDE phase-out.

Authors:  Zana Percy; Mark J La Guardia; Yingying Xu; Robert C Hale; Kim N Dietrich; Bruce P Lanphear; Kimberly Yolton; Ann M Vuong; Kim M Cecil; Joseph M Braun; Changchun Xie; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Organophosphate esters in a cohort of pregnant women: Variability and predictors of exposure.

Authors:  Zana Percy; Ann M Vuong; Maria Ospina; Antonia M Calafat; Mark J La Guardia; Yingying Xu; Robert C Hale; Kim N Dietrich; Changchun Xie; Bruce P Lanphear; Joseph M Braun; Kim M Cecil; Kimberly Yolton; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Assessment of triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) exposure to nail salon workers by air, hand wipe, and urine analysis.

Authors:  Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Alexander Mayer; Jonathan Slone; I-Chen Chen; Michael Zhou; Mark J La Guardia; Nayana Jayatilaka; Maria Ospina; Antonia Calafat
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Hand-me-down hazard: flame retardants in discarded foam products.

Authors:  Kellyn S Betts
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Hardly Flammable Polyurethane Foams with 1,3-Pyrimidine Ring and Boron Atoms.

Authors:  Elżbieta Chmiel-Szukiewicz
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 9.  Preparation of Flame-Retardant Polyurethane and Its Applications in the Leather Industry.

Authors:  Shaolin Lu; Yechang Feng; Peikun Zhang; Wei Hong; Yi Chen; Haojun Fan; Dingshan Yu; Xudong Chen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.329

10.  Occupational exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and other flame retardant foam additives at gymnastics studios: Before, during and after the replacement of pit foam with PBDE-free foams.

Authors:  Diana M Ceballos; Kendra Broadwater; Elena Page; Gerry Croteau; Mark J La Guardia
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 13.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.