Literature DB >> 25812712

Factors associated with short-term local recurrence of liver cancer after percutaneous ablation using irreversible electroporation: a prospective single-center study.

Christoph Niessen1, Juliane Igl2, Benedikt Pregler2, Lukas Beyer2, Ekaterina Noeva3, Marco Dollinger2, Andreas G Schreyer2, Ernst M Jung2, Christian Stroszczynski2, Philipp Wiggermann2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk factors associated with short-term local recurrence of malignant liver lesions after irreversible electroporation (IRE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients (79 malignant liver lesions) were treated with IRE, of whom 14 were excluded from the analysis (including 12 without 6 mo of follow-up and two with incomplete ablation). The remaining 25 patients (aged 59.4 y ± 11.2) had 48 malignant liver lesions, including 22 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), six cholangiocellular carcinomas, and 20 metastatic liver cancers. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the associations of risk factors with early recurrence. The characteristics of patients, lesions, and IRE procedures were assessed by logistic regression.
RESULTS: Fourteen of the 48 treated lesions (29.2%) showed early local recurrence after 6 months. Tumor volume (< 5 cm(3) vs ≥ 5 cm(3); P = .022) and underlying disease type (HCC, cholangiocellular carcinoma, or metastatic disease; P = .023) were independently associated with early local recurrence. However, distances to the surrounding portal veins (< 0.5 cm vs ≥ 0.5 cm; P = .810), hepatic veins (P = .170), hepatic arteries (P = .761), and bile ducts (P = .226) were not significantly associated with local recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Because short distances to the surrounding vessels were not associated with early local recurrence, percutaneous IRE might provide an alternative treatment option for perivascular tumors. However, patients with larger tumor volumes appeared to be poor candidates for percutaneous IRE. Regarding the different types of treated lesions, patients with HCC had significantly better outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25812712     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  22 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for malignant liver tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pankaj Gupta; Muniraju Maralakunte; Sathya Sagar; Praveen Kumar-M; Harish Bhujade; Sreedhara B Chaluvashetty; Naveen Kalra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Recurrence patterns following irreversible electroporation for hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Russell C Langan; Debra A Goldman; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Peter J Allen; Vinod P Balachandran; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: The best is yet to come.

Authors:  Naveen Kalra; Pankaj Gupta; Yogesh Chawla; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28

4.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation of hepatic and abdominal tumors not eligible for surgery or thermal ablation: a western report on safety and efficacy.

Authors:  A Giorgio; F Amendola; A Calvanese; E Ingenito; B Santoro; P Gatti; E Ciracì; P Matteucci; V Giorgio
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-03-06

5.  Percutaneous Ablation of Hepatic Tumors at the Hepatocaval Confluence Using Irreversible Electroporation: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Tiankuan Li; Wei Huang; Zhiyuan Wu; Yong Wang; Qingbing Wang; Ziyin Wang; Qin Liu; Jingjing Liu; Shenjie Wang; Xiaoyi Ding; Zhongmin Wang
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in treatment of Child-Pugh B (7/8) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Authors:  Neal Bhutiani; Prejesh Philips; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Melissa H Potts; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Peri-tumoral Metallic Implants Reduce the Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Helena Cindrič; Bor Kos; Masashi Fujimori; Elena N Petre; Damijan Miklavčič; Stephen B Solomon; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  A Theoretical Argument for Extended Interpulse Delays in Therapeutic High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation Treatments.

Authors:  Kenneth N Aycock; Yajun Zhao; Melvin F Lorenzo; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.756

9.  Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume?

Authors:  P Sánchez-Velázquez; Q Castellví; A Villanueva; R Quesada; C Pañella; M Cáceres; D Dorcaratto; A Andaluz; X Moll; M Trujillo; J M Burdío; E Berjano; L Grande; A Ivorra; F Burdío
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Irreversible electroporation: state of the art.

Authors:  Peter Gk Wagstaff; Mara Buijs; Willemien van den Bos; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; M Pilar Laguna Pes
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.